Seawater gel in allergic rhinitis: entrapment effect and mucociliary clearance compared with saline.

Cemal Cingi, H Halis Unlu, Murat Songu, Sinasi Yalcin, Ismail Topcu, Hamdi Cakli, Cengiz Bal

Journal: Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease 2010;4(1):13-8

PMID: 20042452

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We performed a prospective study to investigate the the efficacy of seawater gel in reducing symptoms in patients with mild allergic rhinitis. We also aimed to investigate the impact of nasal irrigation on mucociliary clearance with seawater gel compared with saline in this patient group.

METHODS

The study was performed in 100 consecutive adult individuals with a history of allergic rhinitis that was not controlled by anti-allergic drugs. Patients were assigned to receive seawater gel nasal spray for 10 days. The efficacy of treatment was assessed by means of total nasal symptom score and clinical findings.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was found between scores of 'nasal discharge, nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching'before and after treatment (p < 0.001). Clinical findings evaluation revealed a statistically significant decrease in lower turbinate colour rating and turbinate congestion at the end of treatment (p< 0.001). Saccharin transit time decreased from baseline in the seawater trials by 12% compared with a 4% decrease for saline. The difference between the percent changes was statistically significant (t = 2.177; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides evidence that a four times daily regimen of seawater gel can be an adjunctive therapy in the patient with allergic rhinitis.

Address: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osmangazi University Medical Faculty, Eskisehir, Turkey.
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.