Best practice recommendations for body composition considerations in sport to reduce health and performance risks: a critical review, original survey and expert opinion by a subgroup of the IOC consensus on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs).

Therese Fostervold Mathisen, Timothy Ackland, Louise M Burke, Naama Constantini, Judith Haudum, Lindsay S Macnaughton, Nanna L Meyer, Margo Mountjoy, Gary Slater, Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen

Journal: British journal of sports medicine 2023;57(17):1148-1158

PMID: 37752006

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The assessment of body composition (BC) in sport raises concern for athlete health, especially where an overfocus on being lighter or leaner increases the risk of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) and disordered eating.

METHODS

We undertook a critical review of the effect of BC on performance (29 longitudinal, prospective or intervention studies) and explored current practice related to BC considerations via a follow-up to a 2013 internationally distributed survey.

RESULTS

The review found that a higher level of body fat was negatively associated with endurance performance, while a gain in muscle mass resulted in performance benefits across sports. BC did not contribute to early talent identification, and no unique cut-off to signify a performance advantage for BC was identified. BC appears to be one of an array of variables impacting performance, and its influence should not be overstated. The survey (125 practitioners, 61 sports and 26 countries) showed subtle changes in BC considerations over time, such as an increased role for sport dietitian/nutrition practitioners as BC measurers (2013: 54%, 2022: 78%); less emphasis on reporting of body fat percentage (2013: 68%, 2022: 46%) and reduced frequency of BC assessment if ≥every fourth week (2013: 18%, 2022: 5%). Respondents remained concerned about a problematic focus on BC (2013: 69%, 2022: 78%). To address these findings, we provide detailed recommendations for BC considerations, including an overview of preferable BC methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'best practice' guidelines stress the importance of a multidisciplinary athlete health and performance team, and the treatment of BC data as confidential medical information. The guidelines provide a health focus around BC, aiming to reduce the associated burden of disordered eating, problematic low energy availability and REDs.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Address: Faculty of Health, Welfare and Organisation, Østfold University College, Fredrikstad, Norway [email protected].; School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.; Faculty of Health Sciences, Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.; Sport Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.; Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Hallein-Rif, Salzburg, Austria.; Department of Sport and Exercise Science, Durham University, Durham, UK.; Department of Human Physiology and Nutrition, University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA.; Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.; REDs Consensus Writing Group, International Olympic Committee, Lausanne, Switzerland.; School of Health, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.; Department of Sport Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.