Craig A Jefferies, Alisa Boucsein, Sara E Styles, Bronte Chamberlain, Venus R Michaels, Hamish R Crockett, Michel De Lange, Anita Lala, Vicki Cunningham, Esko J Wiltshire, Anna S Serlachius, Benjamin J Wheeler
Journal: Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2023;25(12):827-835
PMID: 37782139
Self-monitoring of glucose levels, whether by self-monitored capillary blood glucose (SMBG), real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM), or intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring [isCGM]), is strongly recommended for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study’s aim was to investigate whether isCGM reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to capillary SMBG in children with T1D and elevated glycaemic control. This study was a 12-week multisite 1: 1 randomised, 2-arm, parallel, controlled open-label study which enrolled 100 participants aged 4–13 years with established T1D. Participants were either allocated to the intervention group (isCGM using FreeStyle Libre 2.0) or the control group (SMBG). Results showed that there was no significant difference in HbA1c change between the two groups at 12 weeks. However, isCGM led to increased glucose-monitoring frequency and reduced time spent below the target range. Authors concluded that despite the lack of significant reduction in HbA1c with isCGM (Libre 2.0) compared to standard SMBG over 12 weeks, continued efforts are necessary to enhance outcomes—both glycaemic control and psychosocial well-being—for children facing the greatest challenges and burdens related to their diabetes management.
To investigate whether intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared with capillary self-monitored capillary blood glucose (SMBG) in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and elevated glycemic control. This multicenter 12-week 1:1 randomized, controlled, parallel-arm trial included 100 participants with established T1D aged 4-13 years (mean 10.9 ± 2.3 years) naive to isCGM and with elevated HbA1c 7.5%-12.2% [58-110 mmol/mol] [mean HbA1c was 9.05 (1.3)%] [75.4 (13.9) mmol/mol]. Participants were allocated to 12-week intervention (isCGM; FreeStyle Libre 2.0; Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, United Kingdom) ( = 49) or control (SMBG; = 51). The primary outcome was the difference in change of HbA1c from baseline to 12 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference between groups for change in HbA1c at 12 weeks (0.23 [95% confidence interval; CI: -0.21 to 0.67], = 0.3). However, glucose-monitoring frequency increased with isCGM +4.89/day (95% CI 2.97-6.81; < 0.001). Percent time below range (TBR) <3.9 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) was reduced with isCGM -6.4% (10.6 to -4.2); < 0.001. There were no differences in within group changes for Parent or Child scores of psychosocial outcomes at 12 weeks. For children aged 4-13 years with elevated Hba1c isCGM led to improvements in glucose testing frequency and reduced time below range. However, isCGM did not translate into reducing Hba1c or psychosocial outcomes compared to usual care over 12-weeks. The trial is registered within the Australian New Zealand Trial Registry on February 19, 2020 (ACTRN12620000190909p; ANZCTR.org.au) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Universal Trial Number U1111-1237-0090).
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.