Effects of 12-Week Freestyle Libre 2.0 in Children with Type 1 Diabetes and Elevated HbA1c: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Craig A Jefferies, Alisa Boucsein, Sara E Styles, Bronte Chamberlain, Venus R Michaels, Hamish R Crockett, Michel De Lange, Anita Lala, Vicki Cunningham, Esko J Wiltshire, Anna S Serlachius, Benjamin J Wheeler

Journal: Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2023;25(12):827-835

PMID: 37782139

Plain Language Summary

plain language summary logo

Self-monitoring of glucose levels, whether by self-monitored capillary blood glucose (SMBG), real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM), or intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring [isCGM]), is strongly recommended for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study’s aim was to investigate whether isCGM reduced glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) compared to capillary SMBG in children with T1D and elevated glycaemic control. This study was a 12-week multisite 1: 1 randomised, 2-arm, parallel, controlled open-label study which enrolled 100 participants aged 4–13 years with established T1D. Participants were either allocated to the intervention group (isCGM using FreeStyle Libre 2.0) or the control group (SMBG). Results showed that there was no significant difference in HbA1c change between the two groups at 12 weeks. However, isCGM led to increased glucose-monitoring frequency and reduced time spent below the target range. Authors concluded that despite the lack of significant reduction in HbA1c with isCGM (Libre 2.0) compared to standard SMBG over 12 weeks, continued efforts are necessary to enhance outcomes—both glycaemic control and psychosocial well-being—for children facing the greatest challenges and burdens related to their diabetes management.

Abstract

To investigate whether intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) reduced glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) compared with capillary self-monitored capillary blood glucose (SMBG) in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and elevated glycemic control. This multicenter 12-week 1:1 randomized, controlled, parallel-arm trial included 100 participants with established T1D aged 4-13 years (mean 10.9 ± 2.3 years) naive to isCGM and with elevated HbA1c 7.5%-12.2% [58-110 mmol/mol] [mean HbA1c was 9.05 (1.3)%] [75.4 (13.9) mmol/mol]. Participants were allocated to 12-week intervention (isCGM; FreeStyle Libre 2.0; Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, United Kingdom) ( = 49) or control (SMBG;  = 51). The primary outcome was the difference in change of HbA1c from baseline to 12 weeks. There was no evidence of a difference between groups for change in HbA1c at 12 weeks (0.23 [95% confidence interval; CI: -0.21 to 0.67],  = 0.3). However, glucose-monitoring frequency increased with isCGM +4.89/day (95% CI 2.97-6.81;  < 0.001). Percent time below range (TBR) <3.9 mmol/L (70-180 mg/dL) was reduced with isCGM -6.4% (10.6 to -4.2);  < 0.001. There were no differences in within group changes for Parent or Child scores of psychosocial outcomes at 12 weeks. For children aged 4-13 years with elevated Hba1c isCGM led to improvements in glucose testing frequency and reduced time below range. However, isCGM did not translate into reducing Hba1c or psychosocial outcomes compared to usual care over 12-weeks. The trial is registered within the Australian New Zealand Trial Registry on February 19, 2020 (ACTRN12620000190909p; ANZCTR.org.au) and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (Universal Trial Number U1111-1237-0090).

Address: Starship Child Health, Te Whatu Ora-Health New Zealand, Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; Liggins Institute and Department of Paediatrics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.; Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Pediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand-Southern, Auckland, New Zealand.; Health, Sport and Human Performance, School of Health, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Pacific Edge Ltd., Centre for Innovation, Dunedin, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand-Hauora a Toi, Bay of Plenty, Tauranga, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand New Zealand, Te Tai Tokerau, Whangarei, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand-Capital, Coast and Hutt Valley, Wellington, New Zealand.; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Otago, Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.; Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Patient Centred Factor

Physical Environment

Clinical Imbalances

Laboratory Testing

Modifiable Lifestyle Factors

Jadad Score

Allocation Concealment

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.