Carlo La Vecchia, Patrick Maisonneuve, Sara Gandini, Patrizia Gnagnarella
Journal: The American journal of clinical nutrition 2008;87(6):1793-801
PMID: 18541570
Factors linked to glucose metabolism have been as identified potential causes for chronic diseases including cancer. Both the glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) have been investigated because increased insulin concentrations can promote the activity of certain growth factors that stimulate cancer development. The aim of this study was to explore the association between GI and GL, and cancer risk. Thirty-nine published studies were included and the analysis found that GL and GI were directly associated with a greater risk of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer. There was an inconsistent association with several other cancers, which highlights the complexity of the signalling mechanisms and warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND
Factors linked to glucose metabolism play an important role in the development of cancers, and both glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been investigated as potential etiologic factors.
OBJECTIVE
A meta-analysis was performed to explore the association between GI and GL and cancer risk from published studies.
DESIGN
A comprehensive, systematic bibliographic search of the medical literature was conducted to identify relevant studies. Case-control and cohort studies published before October 2007 that reported cancer risk estimates for GI and GL were included. Pooled relative risks (RRs) were estimated for breast, colorectal, endometrial, and pancreatic cancer.
RESULTS
Thirty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. The interquantile ranges of GL were significantly wider in case-control studies, most of which were conducted in European countries, than in cohort studies. Cohort studies that presented lower ranges of GL also reported lower risk estimates. Overall, both GL and GI were significantly associated with a greater risk of colorectal (summary RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.44 and RR = 1.18; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.34, respectively) and endometrial (RR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.62 and RR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.49) cancer than of breast and pancreatic cancer. There was, however, a significant between-study heterogeneity for colorectal cancer (P < 0.0001). The association between GL and breast cancer disappeared when publication bias was taken into account. No association was found for pancreatic cancer.
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive meta-analysis of GI and GL and cancer risk suggested an overall direct association with colorectal and endometrial cancer.
Full Text Sources:
Medical:
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.