S Jepsen, H Topoll, H Rengers, B Heinz, M Teich, T Hoffmann, E Al-Machot, J Meyle, P-M Jervøe-Storm
Journal: Journal of clinical periodontology 2008;35(5):420-8
PMID: 18341601
OBJECTIVES
Comparison of the outcomes of a combination of an enamel matrix derivative and a synthetic bone graft (EMD/SBC) with EMD alone in wide intra-bony defects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Seventy-three patients with chronic periodontitis were recruited in five centres in Germany. All patients had one wide intra-bony defect of >/=4 mm. Surgical procedures involved microsurgical technique and the modified papilla preservation flap. After debridement, defects were randomly assigned to EMD/SBC (test) or EMD (control). Assessments at baseline and after 6 months included bone sounding, attachment levels, probing pocket depths, bleeding on probing and recessions. Early wound-healing, adverse effects and patients' perceptions were also recorded.
RESULTS
Both treatment modalities led to significant clinical improvements. Change in bone fill 6 months after surgery was 2.0 mm (+/- 2.1) in the test group and 2.1 mm (+/- 1.2) in the control group. A gain in clinical attachment of 1.3 mm (+/- 1.8) in the test group and 1.8 mm (+/- 1.6) in the control group was observed. One week after surgery, primary closure was maintained in 95% of the test sites and 100% of the control sites. No differences in patients' perceptions were found.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study showed similar clinical outcomes following both treatment modalities.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.