Xitong Liu, Wentao Li, Ben W Mol, Wen Wen, Tao Wang, Li Tian, Na Li, Ting Sun, Ting Wang, Hanying Zhou, Na Zhang, Pengfei Qu, Siyu Liu, Juanzi Shi
Journal: European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2023;291():76-81
PMID: 37844507
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether we can identify patient characteristics that serve as treatment selection markers to distinguish which women with expected poor response benefit from increased dosing of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in terms of improving the cumulative live birth rate compared to standard FSH dosing and which women.
STUDY DESIGN
We performed a secondary analysis of an RCT performed between March 2019 and October 2021 comparing cumulative live birth after increased dosing (N = 328) who received 225 or 300 IU/day according to their antral follicle count (AFC) and standard dosing (N = 333) who received 150 IU/day of gonadotropin.
RESULTS
The MFPI analysis showed the benefit of the increased dosing of FSH on cumulative live birth starts to emerge when women were older than 30 years (women > 30 years: 46.5 % vs. 34.2 %; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 1.05-1.66; women ≤ 30 years: 54.7 % vs. 58.6 %; aRR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.72-1.14; p for interaction 0.019). Only those who had AFC between 1 and 3 benefited from the increased FSH dose (AFC 1-3: 38.5 % vs. 6.5 %; aRR 5.88, 95 % CI 1.50-23.15; AFC 4-9: 50.3 % vs. 46.0 %; aRR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.92-1.27; p for interaction 0.023). Expected poor responders defined by the Bologna criteria and POSEIDON criteria did not significantly benefit from the increased dosing of FSH.
CONCLUSIONS
Women who are aged >30 years or have AFC 1-3 are likely to benefit from increased dosing of FSH by having a higher cumulative live birth rate.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.