Who may benefit from an increased gonadotropin dosing in predicted poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI? A secondary analysis assessing treatment selection markers of a randomized trial.

Xitong Liu, Wentao Li, Ben W Mol, Wen Wen, Tao Wang, Li Tian, Na Li, Ting Sun, Ting Wang, Hanying Zhou, Na Zhang, Pengfei Qu, Siyu Liu, Juanzi Shi

Journal: European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2023;291():76-81

PMID: 37844507

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether we can identify patient characteristics that serve as treatment selection markers to distinguish which women with expected poor response benefit from increased dosing of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in terms of improving the cumulative live birth rate compared to standard FSH dosing and which women.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a secondary analysis of an RCT performed between March 2019 and October 2021 comparing cumulative live birth after increased dosing (N = 328) who received 225 or 300 IU/day according to their antral follicle count (AFC) and standard dosing (N = 333) who received 150 IU/day of gonadotropin.

RESULTS

The MFPI analysis showed the benefit of the increased dosing of FSH on cumulative live birth starts to emerge when women were older than 30 years (women > 30 years: 46.5 % vs. 34.2 %; adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.32, 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) 1.05-1.66; women ≤ 30 years: 54.7 % vs. 58.6 %; aRR 0.91, 95 % CI 0.72-1.14; p for interaction 0.019). Only those who had AFC between 1 and 3 benefited from the increased FSH dose (AFC 1-3: 38.5 % vs. 6.5 %; aRR 5.88, 95 % CI 1.50-23.15; AFC 4-9: 50.3 % vs. 46.0 %; aRR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.92-1.27; p for interaction 0.023). Expected poor responders defined by the Bologna criteria and POSEIDON criteria did not significantly benefit from the increased dosing of FSH.

CONCLUSIONS

Women who are aged >30 years or have AFC 1-3 are likely to benefit from increased dosing of FSH by having a higher cumulative live birth rate.

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Address: The Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: [email protected].; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Victoria, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address: [email protected].; The Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China; Translational Medicine Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.; The Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China. Electronic address: [email protected].
Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.