Fluoride Exposure and Skeletal Fluorosis: a Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis.

Federica Veneri, Inga Iamandii, Marco Vinceti, Linda S Birnbaum, Luigi Generali, Ugo Consolo, Tommaso Filippini

Journal: Current environmental health reports 2024;10(4):417-441

PMID: 37861949

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the relation between fluoride exposure and skeletal fluorosis (SF) using a novel statistical methodology for dose-response modeling.

RECENT FINDINGS

Skeletal fluorosis, a major health issue that is endemic in some regions, affects millions of people worldwide. However, data regarding the dose-response relation between fluoride exposure and SF are limited and outdated. We included twenty-three studies in the meta-analysis. When comparing the highest versus the lowest fluoride category, the summary risk ratio (RR) for SF prevalence was 2.05 (95% CI 1.60; 2.64), with a value of 2.73 (95% CI 1.92; 3.90) for drinking water and 1.40 (95% CI 0.90; 2.17) for urinary fluoride. The RR by the risk of bias (RoB) was 2.37 (95% CI 1.56; 3.58) and 1.78 (95% CI 1.34; 2.36) for moderate and high RoB studies, respectively. The dose-response curve based on a one-stage cubic spline regression model showed an almost linear positive relation between exposure and SF occurrence starting from relatively low concentrations up to 5 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L, respectively, for water and urinary fluoride, with no substantial increase above this threshold. The RR for developing moderate-severe forms increases at 5.00 mg/L and 2.5 mg/L of water and urinary fluoride, respectively. Better-quality studies are needed to confirm these results, but greater attention should be given to water fluoride levels to prevent SF, in addition to the other potential adverse effects of fluoride exposure.

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Address: Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO), Unit of Dentistry & Oral-Maxillo-Facial Surgery - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.; PhD Program in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.; Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center (CREAGEN), Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical School - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.; Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center (CREAGEN), Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical School - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy. [email protected].; Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. [email protected].; Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.; Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO), Unit of Dentistry & Oral-Maxillo-Facial Surgery - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.; Environmental, Genetic and Nutritional Epidemiology Research Center (CREAGEN), Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, Medical School - University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124, Modena, Italy.; School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.

Link outs

Subscription / membership required

Bant logo

© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence

NED wishes to thank the following organisations for their support:

We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.