Gustavo De-Deus, Cristiane Audi, Cristiana Murad, Sandra Fidel, Rivail Antonio Sergio Fidel
Journal: Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 2007;104(4):e114-9
PMID: 17656119
OBJECTIVE
The present study systematically compared the sealing ability of oval-shaped canals filled using the System B heat source with either gutta-percha/sealer or Resilon/Epiphany.
STUDY DESIGN
Eighty mandibular incisors with oval-shaped canals were selected after buccolingual and mesiodistal radiographs and divided into 3 experimental groups (n = 20). The teeth were obturated as follows: G1: gutta-percha/Pulp Canal Sealer EWT using cold lateral condensation; G2: gutta-percha/Pulp Canal Sealer EWT using the System B heat source; and G3: Resilon tips and Epiphany sealer using the System B heat source. The roots were mounted in a bacterial leakage model and the system was checked daily during the following 9 weeks. The log rank test was used to analyze the leakage data at intervals of 3, 6, and 9 weeks. The level of significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS
Seven samples of G1 (35%) and 5 samples (20%) each of G2 and G3 were fully contaminated after 9 weeks. Data showed no significant difference between traditional gutta-percha/sealer and Resilon/Epiphany (P > .05). However, both materials showed significant difference to cold lateral condensation when System B heat source was used (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS
The results demonstrated that Resilon/Epiphany combination do not improve the bacterial leakage resistance compared with traditional gutta-percha/sealer fillings.
© Copyright 2026, Nutrition Evidence
We use cookies to improve your experience and analyze site traffic with Google Analytics. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more.