1.
Impact of implementation intentions on physical activity practice in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Silva, MAVD, São-João, TM, Brizon, VC, Franco, DH, Mialhe, FL
PloS one. 2018;13(11):e0206294
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Many behavioural interventions have been implemented in order to increase physical activity levels among adults. Despite these efforts, there is often a large gap between setting goals and attaining goals. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of using theory-based strategies on goal attainment in promoting physical activity among adults (specifically implementation intentions or if-then planning). Particular interest was given to the impact of reinforcements during the intervention and follow-up period for coping with obstacles. A total of 13 randomised controlled trials were included. Implementation intentions consisted of two strategies. Firstly, action planning which was designed to increase awareness of possible future situations where behaviours could be achieved. Secondly, coping planning which focused on barriers that might impede the goal behaviour, and ways to overcome these possible barriers. According to the current literature, application of the theory-based goal setting promoted physical activity behaviours, and this was heightened among those who received reinforcement of plans to increase physical activity during the follow-up period.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to verify the efficacy of using theory-based strategies on implementation intentions in promoting physical activity (PA) among adults. METHODS This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA recommendations. The search was carried out in seven electronic databases (LILACS, PubMed, SciELO, Cochrane, Web of Science) and two searches of the "grey literature" were performed (Openthesis and OpenGrey). Randomized clinical trials (RCT), published up to September 2016, were considered eligible for this study. Two reviewers independently and systematically evaluated the eligibility criteria, and performed data extraction. A meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of comparing the effect between the intervention and control groups. The effect sizes were grouped in two subgroups with the purpose of more accurately verifying the effect caused by reinforcing the implementation intentions strategy, and using the inverse variance statistical method with random effects models to estimate the main effect of the implementation intention strategy on the PA behavior. Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated by using I-square statistics, and the Jadad scale to evaluate the quality of included papers. RESULTS The search resulted in 12,147 records, of which 13 RCTs were considered eligible for this review. Sample age ranged from 18 to 76 years, and participants had conditions such as medullary lesion, coronary disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus, sedentarism or occupational stress. When the summary of the effect was analyzed in the meta-analysis, the result found in the subgroup with reinforcement of the implementation intentions strategy was 0.25 (IC 95% = 0.05-0.45) in favor of the intervention group. This demonstrated that application of the implementation intentions strategy was capable of increasing PA practice in the participants of these studies, in comparison with others that did not use this reinforcement. CONCLUSION The findings of this review indicated that application of the theory of implementation intentions promoted PA behavior among the adults who received reinforcement of this strategy. The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database under the number CRD42018090482.
2.
The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review.
Teychenne, M, Costigan, SA, Parker, K
BMC public health. 2015;15:513
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sedentary behaviour (SB) (e.g. sitting, computer use), has been linked to poor physical outcomes in adults. Research also suggests that SB may be linked to mental health conditions such as depression and self-esteem, but less is known about the link between SB and anxiety. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the link between SB and anxiety. The review, based on nine studies, concluded that there was moderate evidence to suggest that SB was linked to increased risk of anxiety although there is limited insight into the underlying mechanisms that may explain the link between SB and anxiety. Possible biological mechanisms include central nervous system arousal, sleep disturbances and poor metabolic health. Other possible explanations include social withdrawal; the theory that prolonged SB like television viewing may lead to social solitude and increased anxiety as a result. Equally, the authors suggested that it may be that people with increased anxiety spend more time socially withdrawn leading to an increase in SB. The authors concluded that further robust research was required to better understand the relationship between SB and anxiety.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research has linked sedentary behaviour (SB) to adverse physical health outcomes in adults and youth. Although evidence for the relationship between SB and mental health outcomes (e.g., depression) is emerging, little is known regarding risk of anxiety. METHODS A systematic search for original research investigating the association between SB and risk of anxiety was performed using numerous electronic databases. A total of nine observational studies (seven cross-sectional and two longitudinal) were identified. Methodological quality of studies was assessed and a best-evidence synthesis was conducted. RESULTS One cross-sectional study demonstrated a strong methodological quality, five cross-sectional studies demonstrated a moderate methodological quality and three studies (two cross-sectional one longitudinal) received a weak methodological quality rating. Overall, there was moderate evidence for a positive relationship between total SB and anxiety risk as well as for a positive relationship between sitting time and anxiety risk. There was inconsistent evidence for the relationship between screen time, television viewing time, computer use, and anxiety risk. CONCLUSION Limited evidence is available on the association between SB and risk of anxiety. However, our findings suggest a positive association (i.e. anxiety risk increases as SB time increases) may exist (particularly between sitting time and risk of anxiety). Further high-quality longitudinal/interventional research is needed to confirm findings and determine the direction of these relationships.