1.
The association between sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: a systematic review.
Teychenne, M, Costigan, SA, Parker, K
BMC public health. 2015;15:513
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sedentary behaviour (SB) (e.g. sitting, computer use), has been linked to poor physical outcomes in adults. Research also suggests that SB may be linked to mental health conditions such as depression and self-esteem, but less is known about the link between SB and anxiety. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the link between SB and anxiety. The review, based on nine studies, concluded that there was moderate evidence to suggest that SB was linked to increased risk of anxiety although there is limited insight into the underlying mechanisms that may explain the link between SB and anxiety. Possible biological mechanisms include central nervous system arousal, sleep disturbances and poor metabolic health. Other possible explanations include social withdrawal; the theory that prolonged SB like television viewing may lead to social solitude and increased anxiety as a result. Equally, the authors suggested that it may be that people with increased anxiety spend more time socially withdrawn leading to an increase in SB. The authors concluded that further robust research was required to better understand the relationship between SB and anxiety.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research has linked sedentary behaviour (SB) to adverse physical health outcomes in adults and youth. Although evidence for the relationship between SB and mental health outcomes (e.g., depression) is emerging, little is known regarding risk of anxiety. METHODS A systematic search for original research investigating the association between SB and risk of anxiety was performed using numerous electronic databases. A total of nine observational studies (seven cross-sectional and two longitudinal) were identified. Methodological quality of studies was assessed and a best-evidence synthesis was conducted. RESULTS One cross-sectional study demonstrated a strong methodological quality, five cross-sectional studies demonstrated a moderate methodological quality and three studies (two cross-sectional one longitudinal) received a weak methodological quality rating. Overall, there was moderate evidence for a positive relationship between total SB and anxiety risk as well as for a positive relationship between sitting time and anxiety risk. There was inconsistent evidence for the relationship between screen time, television viewing time, computer use, and anxiety risk. CONCLUSION Limited evidence is available on the association between SB and risk of anxiety. However, our findings suggest a positive association (i.e. anxiety risk increases as SB time increases) may exist (particularly between sitting time and risk of anxiety). Further high-quality longitudinal/interventional research is needed to confirm findings and determine the direction of these relationships.