-
1.
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Vegan Diet Versus the American Heart Association-Recommended Diet in Coronary Artery Disease Trial.
Shah, B, Newman, JD, Woolf, K, Ganguzza, L, Guo, Y, Allen, N, Zhong, J, Fisher, EA, Slater, J
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(23):e011367
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammation plays a central role in the progression of atherosclerosis and is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a vegan versus American Heart Association (AHA)-recommended diet on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) [a type of protein found in blood plasma], as well as other markers of inflammation, glucometabolic markers, and lipid profiles in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) on guideline-directed medical therapy. This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study design. The active study duration was 8 weeks, with an interim visit at 4 weeks and a final visit at 8 weeks. Results show: - a significantly greater reduction in hsCRP with a vegan versus AHA-recommended diet in patients with established CAD on guideline-directed medical therapy. - that the degree of weight loss, as measured by both body mass index and waist circumference, did not significantly differ between the 2 diet groups. - that markers of glycaemic control and lipid profiles, overall, also did not significantly differ in the vegan diet group when compared with the AHA-recommended diet group. Authors conclude that in patients with CAD and an elevated hsCRP, despite guideline-directed medical therapy, a vegan diet may be considered to further lower the parameters of inflammation.
Abstract
Background Dietary interventions may play a role in secondary cardiovascular prevention. hsCRP (High-sensitivity C-reactive protein) is a marker of risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease. Methods and Results The open-label, blinded end-point, EVADE CAD (Effects of a Vegan Versus the American Heart Association-Recommended Diet in Coronary Artery Disease) trial randomized participants (n=100) with coronary artery disease to 8 weeks of a vegan or American Heart Association-recommended diet with provision of groceries, tools to measure dietary intake, and dietary counseling. The primary end point was high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. A linear regression model compared end points after 8 weeks of a vegan versus American Heart Association diet and adjusted for baseline concentration of the end point. Significance levels for the primary and secondary end points were set at 0.05 and 0.0015, respectively. A vegan diet resulted in a significant 32% lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (β, 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.49-0.94]; P=0.02) when compared with the American Heart Association diet. Results were consistent after adjustment for age, race, baseline waist circumference, diabetes mellitus, and prior myocardial infarction (adjusted β, 0.67 [0.47-0.94], P=0.02). The degree of reduction in body mass index and waist circumference did not significantly differ between the 2 diet groups (adjusted β, 0.99 [0.97-1.00], P=0.10; and adjusted β, 1.00 [0.98-1.01], P=0.66, respectively). There were also no significant differences in markers of glycemic control between the 2 diet groups. There was a nonsignificant 13% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the vegan diet when compared with the American Heart Association diet (adjusted β, 0.87 [0.78-0.97], P=0.01). There were no significant differences in other lipid parameters. Conclusions In patients with coronary artery disease on guideline-directed medical therapy, a vegan diet may be considered to lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a risk marker of adverse outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02135939.
-
2.
Maternal diet during pregnancy is related with the infant stool microbiome in a delivery mode-dependent manner.
Lundgren, SN, Madan, JC, Emond, JA, Morrison, HG, Christensen, BC, Karagas, MR, Hoen, AG
Microbiome. 2018;6(1):109
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The mechanism by which the maternal diet may influence the gut microbiota of an infant remains unknown. This study aimed to examine the association of maternal diet during pregnancy and mode of delivery on the gut microbiome 6 weeks post-delivery. 976 subjects were enrolled aged of 18 and 45 years old, between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation and their maternal diet during pregnancy was assessed with a validated food frequency questionnaire. Effects of maternal dairy intake on infant gut microbiota showed decreased colonization of milk-digesting bacteria in infants delivered by caesarean section, when compared to those who were born vaginally. The authors concluded that future studies examining the relationship between maternal diet and components of breast milk including microbial and nutritional profiles, may help to offer insight into the mechanism by which maternal diet influences the gut microbiome of an infant.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gut microbiome has an important role in infant health and immune development and may be affected by early-life exposures. Maternal diet may influence the infant gut microbiome through vertical transfer of maternal microbes to infants during vaginal delivery and breastfeeding. We aimed to examine the association of maternal diet during pregnancy with the infant gut microbiome 6 weeks post-delivery in mother-infant dyads enrolled in the New Hampshire Birth Cohort Study. Infant stool samples were collected from 145 infants, and maternal prenatal diet was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire. We used targeted sequencing of the 16S rRNA V4-V5 hypervariable region to characterize infant gut microbiota. To account for differences in baseline and trajectories of infant gut microbial profiles, we stratified analyses by delivery mode. RESULTS We identified three infant gut microbiome clusters, characterized by increased abundance of Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus and Clostridium, and Bacteroides, respectively, overall and in the vaginally delivered infant stratum. In the analyses stratified to infants born vaginally and adjusted for other potential confounders, maternal fruit intake was associated with infant gut microbial community structure (PERMANOVA, p < 0.05). In multinomial logistic regression analyses, increased fruit intake was associated with an increased odds of belonging to the high Streptococcus/Clostridium group among infants born vaginally (OR (95% CI) = 2.73 (1.36, 5.46)). In infants delivered by Cesarean section, we identified three clusters that differed slightly from vaginally delivered infants, which were characterized by a high abundance of Bifidobacterium, high Clostridium and low Streptococcus and Ruminococcus genera, and high abundance of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Maternal dairy intake was associated with an increased odds of infants belonging to the high Clostridium cluster in infants born by Cesarean section (OR (95% CI) = 2.36 (1.05, 5.30)). Linear models suggested additional associations between maternal diet and infant intestinal microbes in both delivery mode strata. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that maternal diet influences the infant gut microbiome and that these effects differ by delivery mode.
-
3.
Probiotic Bifidobacterium strains and galactooligosaccharides improve intestinal barrier function in obese adults but show no synergism when used together as synbiotics.
Krumbeck, JA, Rasmussen, HE, Hutkins, RW, Clarke, J, Shawron, K, Keshavarzian, A, Walter, J
Microbiome. 2018;6(1):121
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Numerous studies have established that the gut microbiota contributes to gastrointestinal health and this can also be achieved through dietary consumption of probiotics and prebiotics. Gut microbiota have also been associated in impacting the markers of metabolic diseases but not many studies are available. Henceforth on this basis this study, looked into the synergistic effects of administering prebiotic together with a select probiotic Bifidobacterium strain. The main objective of this study was to establish the synergistic effect of probiotics and prebiotics and compare their effects on microbiota composition. This study was a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted on a total of 151 volunteers assigned to six treatments groups. The authors concluded that the synergistic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, and neither any significant effects on metabolic disease outcomes were observed within the six treatment groups. Although, the findings from this study clearly demonstrated that the pro and prebiotic components improved markers of colonic permeability, henceforth providing a rational for their use in gut microbiota health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND One way to improve both the ecological performance and functionality of probiotic bacteria is by combining them with a prebiotic in the form of a synbiotic. However, the degree to which such synbiotic formulations improve probiotic strain functionality in humans has not been tested systematically. Our goal was to use a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial in obese humans to compare the ecological and physiological impact of the prebiotic galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and the probiotic strains Bifidobacterium adolescentis IVS-1 (autochthonous and selected via in vivo selection) and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (commercial probiotic allochthonous to the human gut) when used on their own or as synbiotic combinations. After 3 weeks of consumption, strain-specific quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on fecal samples to assess changes in the microbiota. Intestinal permeability was determined by measuring sugar recovery in urine by GC after consumption of a sugar mixture. Serum-based endotoxin exposure was also assessed. RESULTS IVS-1 reached significantly higher cell numbers in fecal samples than BB-12 (P < 0.01) and, remarkably, its administration induced an increase in total bifidobacteria that was comparable to that of GOS. Although GOS showed a clear bifidogenic effect on the resident gut microbiota, both probiotic strains showed only a non-significant trend of higher fecal cell numbers when administered with GOS. Post-aspirin sucralose:lactulose ratios were reduced in groups IVS-1 (P = 0.050), IVS-1 + GOS (P = 0.022), and GOS (P = 0.010), while sucralose excretion was reduced with BB-12 (P = 0.002) and GOS (P = 0.020), indicating improvements in colonic permeability but no synergistic effects. No changes in markers of endotoxemia were observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that "autochthony" of the probiotic strain has a larger effect on ecological performance than the provision of a prebiotic substrate, likely due to competitive interactions with members of the resident microbiota. Although the synbiotic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, our findings clearly showed that the pro- and prebiotic components by themselves improved markers of colonic permeability, providing a rational for their use in pathologies with an underlying leakiness of the gut.
-
4.
Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Meng, C, Bai, C, Brown, TD, Hood, LE, Tian, Q
Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 2018;16(1):33-49
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In this article the authors review research on the influence of the human gut microbiota on the development and progression of gastrointestinal cancers, and go into significant detail about the molecular mechanisms involved. Helicobacter pylori is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC) but other dysbiotic changes in the gut microbiota are also observed in GC. On the other hand, H. pylori is associated with a decreased risk for oesophageal cancer (OC). An increase in gram-negative bacteria is associated with OC, whilst gram-positive bacteria are dominant in a healthy oesophagus. Dietary factors are associated with the risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and may be due to their effect on the bacterial composition of the bowel. The authors explore possible mechanisms for these links. Although the liver is considered sterile, carcinogenesis can be influenced by the gut microbiota through pathogens and bacterial metabolites which can disturb metabolic pathways and immune responses in the liver. In pancreatic cancer (PC), the gut microbiota may influence carcinogenesis by promoting inflammation. In addition to various lifestyle factors, H. pylori is a risk factor for PC. The authors also review the use of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics (a combination of pre- and pro-biotics) and Traditional Chinese Medicine as an adjunct to conventional cancer treatment to reduce side effects, as well as their potential preventive mechanisms.
Abstract
Human gut microbiota play an essential role in both healthy and diseased states of humans. In the past decade, the interactions between microorganisms and tumors have attracted much attention in the efforts to understand various features of the complex microbial communities, as well as the possible mechanisms through which the microbiota are involved in cancer prevention, carcinogenesis, and anti-cancer therapy. A large number of studies have indicated that microbial dysbiosis contributes to cancer susceptibility via multiple pathways. Further studies have suggested that the microbiota and their associated metabolites are not only closely related to carcinogenesis by inducing inflammation and immune dysregulation, which lead to genetic instability, but also interfere with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents. In this article, we mainly reviewed the influence of gut microbiota on cancers in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers) and the regulation of microbiota by diet, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, or the Traditional Chinese Medicine. We also proposed some new strategies in the prevention and treatment of GI cancers that could be explored in the future. We hope that this review could provide a comprehensive overview of the studies on the interactions between the gut microbiota and GI cancers, which are likely to yield translational opportunities to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality by improving prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
-
5.
Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults.
Vanegas, SM, Meydani, M, Barnett, JB, Goldin, B, Kane, A, Rasmussen, H, Brown, C, Vangay, P, Knights, D, Jonnalagadda, S, et al
The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;105(3):635-650
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Increased whole grain consumption has been associated with reduced levels of inflammation. This randomised, controlled trial aimed to assess the effects of a whole grain diet in comparison with a refined grain diet on the immune system, levels of inflammation and gut bacteria. 81 men and women aged between 40 and 60 were randomly assigned to either a whole grain or a refined grain diet for a period of 6 weeks. All other dietary components were kept the same and calorie levels were controlled to maintain weight levels. The study findings showed a positive effect on stool frequency and stool weight with the whole grain diet in comparison to the refined grain diet. The whole grain diet also showed modest positive effects on gut bacteria profiles and aspects of immunity. The whole grain diet showed no effects on markers of inflammation.
Abstract
Background: Observational studies suggest an inverse association between whole-grain (WG) consumption and inflammation. However, evidence from interventional studies is limited, and few studies have included measurements of cell-mediated immunity.Objective: We assessed the effects of diets rich in WGs compared with refined grains (RGs) on immune and inflammatory responses, gut microbiota, and microbial products in healthy adults while maintaining subject body weights.Design: After a 2-wk provided-food run-in period of consuming a Western-style diet, 49 men and 32 postmenopausal women [age range: 40-65 y, body mass index (in kg/m2) <35] were assigned to consume 1 of 2 provided-food weight-maintenance diets for 6 wk.Results: Compared with the RG group, the WG group had increased plasma total alkyresorcinols (a measure of WG intake) (P < 0.0001), stool weight (P < 0.0001), stool frequency (P = 0.02), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producer Lachnospira [false-discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P = 0.25] but decreased pro-inflammatory Enterobacteriaceae (FDR-corrected P = 0.25). Changes in stool acetate (P = 0.02) and total SCFAs (P = 0.05) were higher in the WG group than in the RG group. A positive association was shown between Lachnospira and acetate (FDR-corrected P = 0.002) or butyrate (FDR-corrected P = 0.005). We also showed that there was a higher percentage of terminal effector memory T cells (P = 0.03) and LPS-stimulated ex vivo production of tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.04) in the WG group than in the RG group, which were positively associated with plasma alkylresorcinol concentrations.Conclusion: The short-term consumption of WGs in a weight-maintenance diet increases stool weight and frequency and has modest positive effects on gut microbiota, SCFAs, effector memory T cells, and the acute innate immune response and no effect on other markers of cell-mediated immunity or systemic and gut inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01902394.
-
6.
Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes.
Johnston, CA, Moreno, JP, Foreyt, JP
Current atherosclerosis reports. 2014;16(12):457
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity is a metabolic risk factor for Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular diseases(CVD). This study was carried out to measure the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. 5145 overweight and obese patients with T2D were randomised assigned in groups with lifestyle interventions of weight loss through exercise and reduced calorie intake. The control group were given diabetes support and education. The data from this study suggest that lifestyle interventions were effective in weight loss and management of the CVD. However reducing the risk of CVD in comparison to the control group was not determined.
Abstract
Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) was a randomized controlled trial that examined the impact of long-term participation in an intensive weight loss intervention on cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The results from this trial suggest that intensive lifestyle interventions are effective in helping patients to achieve management of cardiovascular risk factors and reducing the need to initiate medication usage to manage these conditions, though the benefits in terms of the prevention of CVD morbidity and mortality beyond those achieved through aggressive medical management of hypertension and dyslipidemia is not clear. Additional benefits of participation in an intensive lifestyle intervention such as lowered chronic kidney disease risk, blood pressure, medication usage, improved sleep apnea, and partial remission of diabetes are discussed.
-
7.
Vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality in Adventist Health Study 2.
Orlich, MJ, Singh, PN, Sabaté, J, Jaceldo-Siegl, K, Fan, J, Knutsen, S, Beeson, WL, Fraser, GE
JAMA internal medicine. 2013;173(13):1230-8
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Vegetarian diets have been associated with reduced risk of several chronic cardiometabolic diseases. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the effect of vegetarian diets on mortality. The study followed 73,308 male and female Seventh-day Adventists for a mean of 5.79 years. At baseline, just under half were non-vegetarians. Vegetarians had a lower mortality than non-vegetarians: death rates (deaths per 1000 person-years) were 5.4 for vegans, 5.61 for ovo-lacto vegetarians and 5.33 for pesco-vegetarians, which were significantly lower than that of non-vegetarians (6.61). After adjustment for a variety of factors, the lowered hazard ratio seen with vegetarian diets only remained statistically significant in pesco-vegetarians (compared to non-vegetarians). The non-vegetarians had on average higher rates of other risk factors, such as smoking, they consumed more alcohol, exercised less and had lower educational level. The authors concluded that vegetarian dietary patterns were associated with lower mortality.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Some evidence suggests vegetarian dietary patterns may be associated with reduced mortality, but the relationship is not well established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between vegetarian dietary patterns and mortality. DESIGN Prospective cohort study; mortality analysis by Cox proportional hazards regression, controlling for important demographic and lifestyle confounders. SETTING Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2), a large North American cohort. PARTICIPANTS A total of 96,469 Seventh-day Adventist men and women recruited between 2002 and 2007, from which an analytic sample of 73,308 participants remained after exclusions. EXPOSURES Diet was assessed at baseline by a quantitative food frequency questionnaire and categorized into 5 dietary patterns: nonvegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian, lacto-ovo-vegetarian, and vegan. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE The relationship between vegetarian dietary patterns and all-cause and cause-specific mortality; deaths through 2009 were identified from the National Death Index. RESULTS There were 2570 deaths among 73,308 participants during a mean follow-up time of 5.79 years. The mortality rate was 6.05 (95% CI, 5.82-6.29) deaths per 1000 person-years. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in all vegetarians combined vs nonvegetarians was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.97). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality in vegans was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-1.01); in lacto-ovo-vegetarians, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.82-1.00); in pesco-vegetarians, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.69-0.94); and in semi-vegetarians, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.75-1.13) compared with nonvegetarians. Significant associations with vegetarian diets were detected for cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular noncancer mortality, renal mortality, and endocrine mortality. Associations in men were larger and more often significant than were those in women. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Vegetarian diets are associated with lower all-cause mortality and with some reductions in cause-specific mortality. Results appeared to be more robust in males. These favorable associations should be considered carefully by those offering dietary guidance.
-
8.
Cardiovascular effects of intensive lifestyle intervention in type 2 diabetes.
Wing, RR, Bolin, P, Brancati, FL, Bray, GA, Clark, JM, Coday, M, Crow, RS, Curtis, JM, Egan, CM, Espeland, MA, et al
The New England journal of medicine. 2013;369(2):145-54
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Weight loss is recommended for overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes as it increases glycaemic control, reduces risk factors of cardiovascular disease and improves overall quality of life. These benefits, however, are based on short-term studies and the long-term effects of weight loss in this population have not been examined. The aim of this randomised trial was to elucidate whether an intensive lifestyle intervention of weight loss and increased physical activity would decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. Participants were either assigned to an intervention group receiving diet and exercise counselling, or a control group receiving diabetes support and education. A total of 5145 patients were enrolled in the study and the median follow-up was nearly 10 years. The findings of this study showed that an intensive lifestyle intervention did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, as compared with a control programme of diabetes support and education, among overweight and obese patients. While this primary outcome was not reduced, participants in the intervention group experienced various clinically beneficial outcomes throughout the follow-up period.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight loss is recommended for overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes on the basis of short-term studies, but long-term effects on cardiovascular disease remain unknown. We examined whether an intensive lifestyle intervention for weight loss would decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among such patients. METHODS In 16 study centers in the United States, we randomly assigned 5145 overweight or obese patients with type 2 diabetes to participate in an intensive lifestyle intervention that promoted weight loss through decreased caloric intake and increased physical activity (intervention group) or to receive diabetes support and education (control group). The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for angina during a maximum follow-up of 13.5 years. RESULTS The trial was stopped early on the basis of a futility analysis when the median follow-up was 9.6 years. Weight loss was greater in the intervention group than in the control group throughout the study (8.6% vs. 0.7% at 1 year; 6.0% vs. 3.5% at study end). The intensive lifestyle intervention also produced greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin and greater initial improvements in fitness and all cardiovascular risk factors, except for low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The primary outcome occurred in 403 patients in the intervention group and in 418 in the control group (1.83 and 1.92 events per 100 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio in the intervention group, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.09; P=0.51). CONCLUSIONS An intensive lifestyle intervention focusing on weight loss did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; Look AHEAD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00017953.).
-
9.
Long-term effects of provided low and high glycemic load low energy diets on mood and cognition.
Cheatham, RA, Roberts, SB, Das, SK, Gilhooly, CH, Golden, JK, Hyatt, R, Lerner, D, Saltzman, E, Lieberman, HR
Physiology & behavior. 2009;98(3):374-9
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Previous studies have shown a difference between low glycaemic index (GI) and high GI energy restricted diets on mood and cognition. This randomised trial of 46 healthy overweight individuals aimed to assess the long-term effects of LG or HG energy restricted diet on mood and cognition function. Individuals were randomly assigned to a low GI or a high GI diet with caloric restriction for 12 months. The study did not observe any difference in cognitive function of individuals assigned to either the low GI or the high GI diet but it did show a beneficial effect of low GI diet on subclinical depression. The results of this small study were consistent with previous studies where low GI diets may be protective against negative mood change during weight loss whereas negative changes occur if a conventional high GI diet is consumed.
Abstract
Energy-restricted low glycemic load diets are being used increasingly for weight loss. However, the long-term effects of such regimens on mood and cognitive performance are not known. We assessed the effects of low glycemic load (LG) and high glycemic load (HG) energy-restricted diets on mood and cognitive performance during 6 months of a randomized controlled trial when all food was provided. Subjects were 42 healthy overweight adults (age 35+/-5 years; BMI 27.8+/-1.6 kg/m(2)) with a mean weight loss of 8.7+/-5.0% that did not differ significantly by diet randomization. Mood was assessed by using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire. Cognitive performance was assessed by using computerized tests of simple reaction time, vigilance, learning, short-term memory and attention, and language-based logical reasoning. Worsening mood outcome over time was observed in the HG diet group compared to the LG for the depression subscale of POMS (p=0.009 after including hunger as a covariate). There was no significant change over time in any cognitive performance values. These findings suggest a negative effect of an HG weight loss diet on sub-clinical depression but, in contrast to a previous suggestion, provide no support for differential effects of LG versus HD diets on cognitive performance.