1.
Digital messaging to support control for type 2 diabetes (StAR2D): a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Farmer, A, Bobrow, K, Leon, N, Williams, N, Phiri, E, Namadingo, H, Cooper, S, Prince, J, Crampin, A, Besada, D, et al
BMC public health. 2021;21(1):1907
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Many individuals with type 2 diabetes find it challenging to adhere to treatments possibly due to lack of support. Text messaging has been shown to be effective for treatment adherence in various parts of the world, yet it is unclear on its effect in Malawi and sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this randomised control trial of 1186 individuals was to determine the effect of motivational and educational text messages three to four times per week for 12 months on treatment success. The results showed that SMS text messages resulted in improved blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals, yet no effect on blood sugar control. It was concluded that text messaging without other support from health care professionals may be inadequate for the self-management of type 2 diabetes. This study could be used by health care professionals to understand that there are additional support strategies for individuals with type 2 diabetes, yet these should be secondary to the input from professionals.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to take medicines for diabetes as prescribed contributes to poor outcomes from the condition. Mobile phones are ubiquitous and short message service (SMS) texts have shown promise as a low-cost intervention. We tested the effectiveness of SMS-text messaging in improving outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. METHODS StAR2D was a 12-month two-arm randomised trial of SMS-text messaging and usual care in Cape Town, South Africa and Lilongwe, Malawi. Messages used behaviour change theory and were developed with patients and staff. The intervention group received four messages each week. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who collected > 80% medication and changes in systolic blood pressure, lipids, cardiovascular risk, and the proportion of the participants reaching treatment goals. RESULTS The trial took place between 1 October, 2016 and 1 October 2018, 1186 participants were randomised to intervention (593) and control (593) groups. 91% of participants completed follow-up. There was a reduction in HbA1c (DCCT) in both groups but not in mean change (95% CI) between groups (- 0.08% (- 0.31 to 0.16) (IFCC - 0.82 mmol/mol (- 3.44 to 1.79). There was a small but not significant increase in the proportions of participants likely to have collected 80% or more of medication (Relative risk 1.11 (0.84 to 1.47; P = 0.47). There was a significant difference between groups in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline of 3.46 mmHg (1.48 to 5.44, P = 0.001) in favour of the intervention group. The between group difference in change in 10-year risk of coronary heart disease was - 0.71% (- 1.46 to 0.04, P = 0.064). The proportion of participants meeting treatment goals in the intervention group was 36.0% and in the control group 26.8% (Relative risk 1.36 (1.13 to 1.63, P = 0.001). Participants reported many challenges to adherence despite finding messages acceptable and useful. CONCLUSIONS Whilst SMS text messages do not lead to improved glycaemia in these low-resource settings there appeared to be an impact on blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals but the mechanisms for this are unclear. Text messages alone, may be unsuccessful unless accompanied by health system strengthening and other forms of self-management support for type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN70768808. Registered 1 July 2015, http://www.isrctn.com/I ISRCTN70768808.
2.
Effects of the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, Healthy Communities Program for Obesity Prevention among Vulnerable Children: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
Choo, J, Yang, HM, Jae, SY, Kim, HJ, You, J, Lee, J
International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Childhood obesity is especially pronounced in those from lower socioeconomical backgrounds. The Three-Healthy Programme is a multilevel initiative designed to target obesity in these children. This randomised control trial of 104 socioeconomically vulnerable children and 59 of their parents over 12 weeks aimed to determine the effects of the Three-Healthy Programme on healthy lifestyle behaviours and obesity in children in the public welfare system. The results showed that the Three-Healthy Programme, which targeted child behavioural strategies, parenting strategies and organisational strategies helped to increase a child’s knowledge of healthy lifestyle behaviours, vegetable intake and physical activity. However, there were no improvements in breakfast, fruit, milk, no-sugar beverage and fast-food consumption. This did not translate to improved obesity status. It was concluded that the Three-Healthy Programme may be effective at promoting healthy lifestyles in socioeconomically vulnerable children. The short study duration may be the reason why obesity did not improve, at least one year of intervention may be needed. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand the importance of targeting all influencers for weight loss in children from socioeconomically vulnerable backgrounds.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to examine whether the Healthy Children, Healthy Families, and Healthy Communities Program, consisting of multi-level strategies for obesity prevention tailoring the context of socioeconomically vulnerable children based on an ecological perspective, would be effective on improving their healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status. Methods: Participants were 104 children (and 59 parents) enrolled in public welfare systems in Seoul, South Korea. Based on a cluster-randomized controlled trial (no. ISRCTN11347525), eight centers were randomly assigned to intervention (four centers, 49 children, 27 parents) versus control groups (four centers, 55 children, 32 parents). Multi-level interventions of child-, parent-, and center-level strategies were conducted for 12 weeks. Children's healthy lifestyle behaviors and obesity status were assessed as daily recommended levels and body mass index ≥85th percentile, respectively. Parents' parenting behaviors were measured by the Family Nutrition and Physical Activity scale. Results: Compared to the control group, the intervention group showed significant improvements in total composite scores of healthy-lifestyle behaviors-including 60-min of moderate physical activity-but not in obesity status among children. Moreover, the intervention group showed significant improvements in parenting behaviors among parents. Conclusion: The multi-level strategies for obesity prevention based on an ecological perspective may be effective for promoting healthy lifestyles among socioeconomically vulnerable children.