-
1.
Does the microbiome and virome contribute to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome?
Newberry, F, Hsieh, SY, Wileman, T, Carding, SR
Clinical science (London, England : 1979). 2018;132(5):523-542
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) (ME/CFS) is a disabling and debilitating disease. Several studies have shown alterations in the gut microbiome (dysbiosis) in patients with ME/CFS. However, in focusing on the bacterial components of the microbiome, the viral component of the microbiome (known as the virome) has been neglected. Viruses can change the microbiome which can influence the health. This area is therefore important for research into ME/CFS. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current evidence supporting microbiome alterations in ME/CFS patients. Additionally, the challenges associated with microbiome studies are discussed. A literature search was done and 11 papers were found that had examined the microbiome ME/CFS patients, dating from 1998 to 2017. It was not possible to compare the studies statistically but from looking at each one individually there is sufficient evidence to support the claim of an altered intestinal microbiome in ME/CFS patients. ME/CFS is multifactorial and potential dysbiosis should be considered to be only part of the picture. Future studies are needed to adopt standardized techniques and analyses. As research increases, it is becoming clear that the virome can directly and indirectly affect host health, and may play a role in the pathogenesis of ME/CFS.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME)/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) (ME/CFS) is a disabling and debilitating disease of unknown aetiology. It is a heterogeneous disease characterized by various inflammatory, immune, viral, neurological and endocrine symptoms. Several microbiome studies have described alterations in the bacterial component of the microbiome (dysbiosis) consistent with a possible role in disease development. However, in focusing on the bacterial components of the microbiome, these studies have neglected the viral constituent known as the virome. Viruses, particularly those infecting bacteria (bacteriophages), have the potential to alter the function and structure of the microbiome via gene transfer and host lysis. Viral-induced microbiome changes can directly and indirectly influence host health and disease. The contribution of viruses towards disease pathogenesis is therefore an important area for research in ME/CFS. Recent advancements in sequencing technology and bioinformatics now allow more comprehensive and inclusive investigations of human microbiomes. However, as the number of microbiome studies increases, the need for greater consistency in study design and analysis also increases. Comparisons between different ME/CFS microbiome studies are difficult because of differences in patient selection and diagnosis criteria, sample processing, genome sequencing and downstream bioinformatics analysis. It is therefore important that microbiome studies adopt robust, reproducible and consistent study design to enable more reliable and valid comparisons and conclusions to be made between studies. This article provides a comprehensive review of the current evidence supporting microbiome alterations in ME/CFS patients. Additionally, the pitfalls and challenges associated with microbiome studies are discussed.
-
2.
Mood Disorders and Gluten: It's Not All in Your Mind! A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Busby, E, Bold, J, Fellows, L, Rostami, K
Nutrients. 2018;10(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gluten is a protein found in grains such as wheat, barley and rye. For some people, gluten can cause serious health issues such as coeliac disease (CD). A growing body of research suggests that mood symptoms are associated with gluten-related disorders. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish whether a relationship exists between mood and gluten consumption. 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis. A gluten-free diet (GFD) significantly reduced depressive symptoms in 953 participants overall. Subgroup analyses revealed no difference in effect on mood between those with and without diagnosed CD or between those with a genetic predisposition to CD. In patients diagnosed with classical CD, a GFD resulted in a statistically significant reduction in mood symptoms, whereas the effect for silent CD patients was not significant. The authors concluded that gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. Future studies should focus on gluten and mood in participants without a gut-related disorder, for example, in a population sample with depression. Finally, the level of support available to help a patient in maintaining a GFD diet over time should be carefully considered when recommending a GFD in practice.
Abstract
Gluten elimination may represent an effective treatment strategy for mood disorders in individuals with gluten-related disorders. However, the directionality of the relationship remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of prospective studies for effects of gluten on mood symptoms in patients with or without gluten-related disorders. Six electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library) were searched, from inception to 8 August 2018, for prospective studies published in English. Meta-analyses with random-effects were performed. Three randomised-controlled trials and 10 longitudinal studies comprising 1139 participants fit the inclusion criteria. A gluten-free diet (GFD) significantly improved pooled depressive symptom scores in GFD-treated patients (Standardised Mean Difference (SMD) -0.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.55 to -0.20; p < 0.0001), with no difference in mean scores between patients and healthy controls after one year (SMD 0.01, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.20, p = 0.94). There was a tendency towards worsening symptoms for non-coeliac gluten sensitive patients during a blinded gluten challenge vs. placebo (SMD 0.21, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.15; p = 0.25). Our review supports the association between mood disorders and gluten intake in susceptible individuals. The effects of a GFD on mood in subjects without gluten-related disorders should be considered in future research.
-
3.
Superiority of magnesium and vitamin B6 over magnesium alone on severe stress in healthy adults with low magnesemia: A randomized, single-blind clinical trial.
Pouteau, E, Kabir-Ahmadi, M, Noah, L, Mazur, A, Dye, L, Hellhammer, J, Pickering, G, Dubray, C
PloS one. 2018;13(12):e0208454
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Magnesium (Mg) plays a role in over 600 biochemical reactions. It is depleted during stress, and a lack of Mg increases the release of stress hormones, leading to a vicious cycle of lowered resistance to stress and further Mg depletion. Vitamin B6 influences neurotransmitters involved in depression and anxiety, and may improve the uptake of magnesium into cells. The aim of this randomised control trial was to evaluate the effects of combined magnesium and vitamin B6 supplementation in stressed people with low blood levels of magnesium. 260 adults aged 18-50 completed the 8-week study. At the beginning of the trial, all participants had suboptimal blood serum magnesium (0.45 mmol/L to 0.85 mmol/L) and reported moderate to extremely severe stress levels. Participants were divided into two groups. One group received magnesium supplementation (465mg magnesium lactate dihydrate, equivalent to 300mg elemental magnesium; Mg), whilst the other received a combined magnesium and vitamin B6 supplement (470 mg magnesium lactate dihydrate plus 5 mg pyridoxine hydrochloride; Mg-B6). After 8 weeks, the Mg-B6 group reported a reduction in stress levels of 44.9%, and the Mg group reported a reduction of 42.4%, with no statistical difference between the two groups overall. However, participants who reported severe or extremely severe stress levels at the start of the study experienced 24% greater improvement with Mg-B6 versus Mg. Researchers concluded that in people with low magnesium levels experiencing severe or extremely severe stress, combining vitamin B6 with magnesium appears to be of greater benefit than supplementing Mg alone.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Animal and clinical studies suggest complementary effects of magnesium and high-dose pyridoxine (vitamin B6) on stress reduction. This is the first randomized trial evaluating the effects of combined magnesium and vitamin B6 supplementation on stress in a stressed population with low magnesemia using a validated measure of perceived stress. METHODS In this Phase IV, investigator-blinded trial (EudraCT: 2015-003749-24), healthy adults with Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-42) stress subscale score >18 and serum magnesium concentration 0.45 mmol/L-0.85 mmol/L, were randomized 1:1 to magnesium-vitamin B6 combination (Magne B6 [Mg-vitamin B6]; daily dose 300 mg and 30 mg, respectively) or magnesium alone (Magnespasmyl [Mg]; daily dose 300 mg). Outcomes included change in DASS-42 stress subscale score from baseline to Week 8 (primary endpoint) and Week 4, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS In the modified intention-to-treat analysis (N = 264 subjects), both treatment arms substantially reduced DASS-42 stress subscale score from baseline to Week 8 (Mg-vitamin B6, 44.9%; Mg 42.4%); no statistical difference between arms was observed (p>0.05). An interaction (p = 0.0097) between baseline stress level and treatment warranted subgroup analysis (as per statistical plan); adults with severe/extremely severe stress (DASS-42 stress subscale score ≥25; N = 162) had a 24% greater improvement with Mg-vitamin B6 versus Mg at Week 8 (3.16 points, 95% CI 0.50 to 5.82, p = 0.0203). Consistent results were observed in the per protocol analysis and at Week 4. Overall, 12.1% of Mg-vitamin B6 treated and 17.4% of Mg-treated subjects experienced AEs potentially treatment related. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest oral Mg supplementation alleviated stress in healthy adults with low magnesemia and the addition of vitamin B6 to Mg was not superior to Mg supplementation alone. With regard to subjects with severe/extremely severe stress, this study provides clinical support for greater benefit of Mg combined with vitamin B6.
-
4.
Food for Mood: Relevance of Nutritional Omega-3 Fatty Acids for Depression and Anxiety.
Larrieu, T, Layé, S
Frontiers in physiology. 2018;9:1047
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The human brain contains high levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Of these PUFAs, omega-3s have been widely studied in relation to many brain diseases, including anxiety and depression. This review focuses on the clinical and experimental data linking dietary intake of omega-3s with depression or anxiety. People diagnosed with anxiety and depressive disorders have lower omega-3s and a higher ratio of omega-6s to omega-3s in their blood and brains compared to healthy subjects. Experiments on omega-3 supplementation for depression and post-traumatic stress have had promising results. Numerous mechanisms have been proposed for the effects of omega-3s. These include direct effects on specific receptors in the brain, regulation of the endocannabinoid system, effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and reduction of inflammation in the brain. The authors conclude that more research is needed into the potential of omega-3s as treatment for mood-related diseases.
Abstract
The central nervous system (CNS) has the highest concentration of lipids in the organism after adipose tissue. Among these lipids, the brain is particularly enriched with polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) represented by the omega-6 (ω6) and omega-3 (ω3) series. These PUFAs include arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), respectively. PUFAs have received substantial attention as being relevant to many brain diseases, including anxiety and depression. This review addresses an important question in the area of nutritional neuroscience regarding the importance of ω3 PUFAs in the prevention and/or treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases, mainly depression and anxiety. In particular, it focuses on clinical and experimental data linking dietary intake of ω3 PUFAs and depression or anxiety. In particular, we will discuss recent experimental data highlighting how ω3 PUFAs can modulate neurobiological processes involved in the pathophysiology of anxiety and depression. Potential mechanisms involved in the neuroprotective and corrective activity of ω3 PUFAs in the brain are discussed, in particular the sensing activity of free fatty acid receptors and the activity of the PUFAs-derived endocannabinoid system and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.
-
5.
A plant-based diet in overweight individuals in a 16-week randomized clinical trial: metabolic benefits of plant protein.
Kahleova, H, Fleeman, R, Hlozkova, A, Holubkov, R, Barnard, ND
Nutrition & diabetes. 2018;8(1):58
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Suboptimal nutrition is a major cause of obesity, chronic disease, and premature death across the nation and worldwide. The aim of this study was to explore the effects of plant protein, as part of a plant-based diet, on weight control, body composition, and insulin resistance in overweight individuals. This study is a secondary analysis of data from a 16-week randomized clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a vegan or a control group. Results indicate that: - the quality and quantity of dietary protein from a plant-based vegan diet are associated with improvements in body composition, body weight, and insulin resistance in overweight individuals. - decreased intake of animal protein and an increased intake of plant protein were associated with a decrease in fat mass. - decreased histidine [amino acid] intake was associated with a decrease in insulin resistance. - decreased intake of the amino acids threonine, leucine, lysine, methionine, and tyrosine were each associated with a decrease in insulin resistance (mainly driven by weight loss). Authors conclude that there is the need for additional research to explore the mechanisms explaining the beneficial role of plant protein and specific amino acids in regulating body weight, body composition, and insulin resistance.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A plant-based diet is an effective strategy in the treatment of obesity. In this 16-week randomized clinical trial, we tested the effect of a plant-based diet on body composition and insulin resistance. As a part of this trial, we investigated the role of plant protein on these outcomes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Overweight participants (n = 75) were randomized to follow a plant-based (n = 38) or a control diet (n = 37). Dual X-ray Absorptiometry assessed body composition, Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA-IR) assessed insulin resistance, and a linear regression model was used to test the relationship between protein intake, body composition, and insulin resistance. RESULTS The plant-based vegan diet proved to be superior to the control diet in improving body weight, fat mass, and insulin resistance markers. Only the vegan group showed significant reductions in body weight (treatment effect -6.5 [95% CI -8.9 to -4.1] kg; Gxt, p < 0.001), fat mass (treatment effect -4.3 [95% CI -5.4 to -3.2] kg; Gxt, p < 0.001), and HOMA-IR (treatment effect -1.0 [95% CI -1.2 to -0.8]; Gxt, p = 0.004). The decrease in fat mass was associated with an increased intake of plant protein and decreased intake of animal protein (r = -0.30, p = 0.011; and r = +0.39, p = 0.001, respectively). In particular, decreased % leucine intake was associated with a decrease in fat mass (r = +0.40; p < 0.001), in both unadjusted and adjusted models for changes in BMI and energy intake. In addition, decreased % histidine intake was associated with a decrease in insulin resistance (r = +0.38; p = 0.003), also independent of changes in BMI and energy intake. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide evidence that plant protein, as a part of a plant-based diet, and the resulting limitation of leucine and histidine intake are associated with improvements in body composition and reductions in both body weight and insulin resistance.
-
6.
Impact of vegan diets on gut microbiota: An update on the clinical implications.
Wong, MW, Yi, CH, Liu, TT, Lei, WY, Hung, JS, Lin, CL, Lin, SZ, Chen, CL
Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal. 2018;30(4):200-203
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gut microbiota is defined as microbes that collectively inhabit the gut ecosystem. Several factors, including diet, age, birth mode, breast-feeding or formula-feeding, geography, exercise, alcohol consumption, and exposure to antibiotics may influence gut microbiota. Previous conventional culturing together with recent culture-independent molecular studies show that vegan diets appear to affect gut microbiota. Furthermore, recent literature also indicates that vegan diets may have various health benefits, including amelioration of metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Authors conclude that these findings have their limitations. Thus, further research may help to clarify the complex mechanisms and interrelationships between vegan diets and gut microbiota.
Abstract
Numerous studies indicate that microbiota plays an important role in human health. Diet is a factor related to microbiota which also influences human health. The relationships between diet, microbiota, and human health are complex. This review focuses on the current literature on vegan diets and their unique impact on gut microbiota. We also report on the health benefits of a vegan diet for metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and rheumatoid arthritis concerning relevant impacts from gut microbiota. Despite evidence supporting the clinical relevance of vegan gut microbiota to human health, the whole mechanism awaits further investigation.
-
7.
Vegetarian diet and blood pressure in a hospital-base study.
Liu, HW, Liu, JS, Kuo, KL
Ci ji yi xue za zhi = Tzu-chi medical journal. 2018;30(3):176-180
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
High blood pressure (BP) accounts for approximately 50% of cardiovascular disease morbidity worldwide. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a vegetarian diet on BP in participants with or without proteinuria [the earliest marker of kidney damage]. This study is a large retrospective cross-sectional study. The medical records of 36,617 individuals, 16,415 (44.8%) males and 20,202 (55.2%) females were examined. Results indicate that a vegan diet was significantly associated with lower systolic and diastolic BP compared with a nonvegetarian diet in asymptomatic participants with proteinuria. Authors conclude that a vegan diet could be an effective nonpharmacologic approach to reduce BP.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies have reported that a vegetarian diet may lower blood pressure (BP), but the effect of diet on BP in asymptomatic participants with proteinuria is unknown. We examined the association of diet and BP in individuals with or without proteinuria. MATERIALS AND METHODS This cross-sectional study analyzed data from participants who were more than 40 years old and received physical checkups at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital from September 5, 2005, to December 31, 2016. Diets were assessed at baseline by a self-reported questionnaire and categorized as vegan, lacto-ovo vegetarian, or omnivore. There were 2818 (7.7%) vegans, 5616 (15.3%) lacto-ovo vegetarians, and 28,183 (77.0%) omnivores. The effect of different parameters on BP was determined using a multivariate multiple linear regression model with no intercept, with control for important characteristics and lifestyle confounders. RESULTS The vegan group had a lower mean systolic BP (-3.87 mmHg, P < 0.001) and diastolic BP (-2.48 mmHg, P < 0.001) than the omnivore group. Participants with proteinuria had a higher systolic BP (4.26 mmHg, P < 0.001) and diastolic BP (2.15 mmHg, P < 0.001) than those without proteinuria. Interaction analysis indicated that vegan participants with proteinuria had a lower systolic BP (-2.73 mmHg, P = 0.046) and diastolic BP (-2.54 mmHg, P = 0.013) than other participants with proteinuria. However, individuals in the lacto-ovo group with proteinuria had a BP similar to other participants with proteinuria. CONCLUSIONS A vegan diet was associated with lower BP in asymptomatic participants with proteinuria. This diet could be a nonpharmacologic method to reduce BP.
-
8.
Cardiometabolic risk factors in vegans; A meta-analysis of observational studies.
Benatar, JR, Stewart, RAH
PloS one. 2018;13(12):e0209086
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Healthy, balanced, plant-based diets have been associated with better health outcomes, however the role of dairy and meat products on heart disease and death due to heart disease is not fully understood. Vegan diets are strictly plant-based and could provide an opportunity to investigate the effect of eliminating animal products on heart disease risk. This meta-analysis of 40 observational studies aimed to evaluate the effect of a vegan diet on heart disease risk factors. The results showed that vegans in most countries had improved heart disease risk factors such as a small waist circumference, lower body mass index (BMI) and balanced blood sugars compared to omnivores, however studies from Taiwan failed to show this trend. It was concluded that a vegan diet in most countries is associated with better health outcomes compared to an omnivorous diet. This study could be use by healthcare practitioners to recommend a vegan diet to those at a higher risk of heart disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence that plant based diets are associated with lower cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVE To evaluate effects of a vegan compared to an omnivorous diet on cardio-metabolic risk factors. METHODS Meta-analysis of observational studies published between 1960 and June 2018 that reported one or more cardio-metabolic risk factors in vegans and controls eating an omnivorous diet were undertaken. Macro-nutrient intake and cardio-metabolic risk factors were compared by dietary pattern. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of each study. The inverse-variance method was used to pool mean differences. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software version 5•2 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen. RESULTS 40 studies with 12 619 vegans and 179 630 omnivores were included. From food frequency questionnaires in 28 studies, vegans compared to omnivores consumed less energy (-11%, 95% confidence interval -14 to -8) and less saturated fat (- 51%, CI -57 to -45). Compared to controls vegans had a lower body mass index (-1.72 kg/m2, CI -2.30 to -1.16), waist circumference (-2.35 cm, CI -3.93 to -0.76), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.49 mmol/L CI -0.62 to -0.36), triglycerides (-0.14 mmol/L, CI -0.24 to -0.05), fasting blood glucose (-0.23 mmol/, CI -0.35 to -0.10), and systolic (-2.56 mmHg, CI -4.66 to -0.45) and diastolic blood pressure (-1.33 mmHg, CI -2.67 to -0.02), p<0.0001 for all. Results were consistent for studies with < and ≥ 50 vegans, and published before and after 2010. However in several large studies from Taiwan a vegan diet was not associated with favourable cardio-metabolic risk factors compared to the control diets. CONCLUSION In most countries a vegan diet is associated with a more favourable cardio- metabolic profile compared to an omnivorous diet.
-
9.
Effectiveness of plant-based diets in promoting well-being in the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.
Toumpanakis, A, Turnbull, T, Alba-Barba, I
BMJ open diabetes research & care. 2018;6(1):e000534
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Diabetes can cause a number of health complications if not well managed and treated and has the potential to have a huge impact on people’s physical and psychological wellbeing. The aims of this review are to systematically analyse the available literature on plant-based diet interventions targeting and/or including adults with diabetes and to clearly define the benefits on well-being of such interventions. This study is a systemic review of 11 controlled trials, of which 7 were randomised. Results demonstrate that a plant-based diet can significantly improve psychological well-being, quality of life, control of type 2 diabetes measured by glycated haemoglobin [is a form of haemoglobin that is measured primarily to know the average plasma glucose concentration over a three-month period] and a number of physical characteristics in people with type 2 diabetes. Authors conclude that future studies could explore ways of delivering proper nutritional education in order to support participants to follow healthier dietary patterns.
Abstract
Diet interventions have suggested an association between plant-based diets and improvements in psychological well-being, quality of life and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control in populations with diabetes. The aims of this review are to systematically analyze the available literature on plant-based diet interventions targeting diabetes in adults and to clearly define the benefits on well-being of such interventions. This is a systematic review of controlled trials. A computerized systematic literature search was conducted in the following electronic databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, E-Journals, Excerpta Medica Database, MEDLINE, Health Management Information Consortium, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, PubMed, SocINDEX and Web of Science. The search strategy retrieved 1240 articles, of which 11 met the inclusion criteria (n=433; mean sample age 54.8 years). Plant-based diets were associated with significant improvement in emotional well-being, physical well-being, depression, quality of life, general health, HbA1c levels, weight, total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, compared with several diabetic associations' official guidelines and other comparator diets. Plant-based diets can significantly improve psychological health, quality of life, HbA1c levels and weight and therefore the management of diabetes.
-
10.
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Vegan Diet Versus the American Heart Association-Recommended Diet in Coronary Artery Disease Trial.
Shah, B, Newman, JD, Woolf, K, Ganguzza, L, Guo, Y, Allen, N, Zhong, J, Fisher, EA, Slater, J
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(23):e011367
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Inflammation plays a central role in the progression of atherosclerosis and is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a vegan versus American Heart Association (AHA)-recommended diet on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) [a type of protein found in blood plasma], as well as other markers of inflammation, glucometabolic markers, and lipid profiles in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD) on guideline-directed medical therapy. This study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study design. The active study duration was 8 weeks, with an interim visit at 4 weeks and a final visit at 8 weeks. Results show: - a significantly greater reduction in hsCRP with a vegan versus AHA-recommended diet in patients with established CAD on guideline-directed medical therapy. - that the degree of weight loss, as measured by both body mass index and waist circumference, did not significantly differ between the 2 diet groups. - that markers of glycaemic control and lipid profiles, overall, also did not significantly differ in the vegan diet group when compared with the AHA-recommended diet group. Authors conclude that in patients with CAD and an elevated hsCRP, despite guideline-directed medical therapy, a vegan diet may be considered to further lower the parameters of inflammation.
Abstract
Background Dietary interventions may play a role in secondary cardiovascular prevention. hsCRP (High-sensitivity C-reactive protein) is a marker of risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease. Methods and Results The open-label, blinded end-point, EVADE CAD (Effects of a Vegan Versus the American Heart Association-Recommended Diet in Coronary Artery Disease) trial randomized participants (n=100) with coronary artery disease to 8 weeks of a vegan or American Heart Association-recommended diet with provision of groceries, tools to measure dietary intake, and dietary counseling. The primary end point was high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. A linear regression model compared end points after 8 weeks of a vegan versus American Heart Association diet and adjusted for baseline concentration of the end point. Significance levels for the primary and secondary end points were set at 0.05 and 0.0015, respectively. A vegan diet resulted in a significant 32% lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (β, 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.49-0.94]; P=0.02) when compared with the American Heart Association diet. Results were consistent after adjustment for age, race, baseline waist circumference, diabetes mellitus, and prior myocardial infarction (adjusted β, 0.67 [0.47-0.94], P=0.02). The degree of reduction in body mass index and waist circumference did not significantly differ between the 2 diet groups (adjusted β, 0.99 [0.97-1.00], P=0.10; and adjusted β, 1.00 [0.98-1.01], P=0.66, respectively). There were also no significant differences in markers of glycemic control between the 2 diet groups. There was a nonsignificant 13% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the vegan diet when compared with the American Heart Association diet (adjusted β, 0.87 [0.78-0.97], P=0.01). There were no significant differences in other lipid parameters. Conclusions In patients with coronary artery disease on guideline-directed medical therapy, a vegan diet may be considered to lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a risk marker of adverse outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02135939.