1.
Gut dysbiosis: a potential link between increased cancer risk in ageing and inflammaging.
Biragyn, A, Ferrucci, L
The Lancet. Oncology. 2018;19(6):e295-e304
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
This study looks at the important role our gut bacterial and commensal microbes play in supporting immunity and potentially reducing the risk of cancer from aging. Cancer risk increases as we age and is one of the main causes of reduced life expectancy. Our gut microbiome changes continually in response to diet, lifestyle, infection, and activation of immune responses. Gut dysbiosis is characterised by a shift towards proinflammatory commensals and a reduction of beneficial microbes, which can cause impairment and leakiness of the intestinal barrier. This is thought to trigger inflammaging or rather aging in a state of continual inflammation, where the immune system is in a heightened state of activation, and the body essentially creates an environment conducive to cancer. The gut is populated by trillions of species of bacteria which work together with our immune cells. As we age the diversity and density of these beneficial bacteria reduce. Therapies which support the balance of our commensal bacteria may prove effective at reducing rates of cancer in the elderly.
Abstract
Cancer incidence substantially increases with ageing in both men and women, although the reason for this increase is unknown. In this Series paper, we propose that age-associated changes in gut commensal microbes, otherwise known as the microbiota, facilitate cancer development and growth by compromising immune fitness. Ageing is associated with a reduction in the beneficial commensal microbes, which control the expansion of pathogenic commensals and maintain the integrity of the intestinal barrier through the production of mucus and lipid metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids. Expansion of gut dysbiosis and leakage of microbial products contributes to the chronic proinflammatory state (inflammaging), which negatively affects the immune system and impairs the removal of mutant and senescent cells, thereby enabling tumour outgrowth. Studies in animal models and the importance of commensals in cancer immunotherapy suggest that this status can be reversible. Thus, interventions that alter the composition of the gut microbiota might reduce inflammaging and rejuvenate immune functions to provide anticancer benefits in frail elderly people.
2.
How Does the Brain Implement Adaptive Decision Making to Eat?
Compan, V, Walsh, BT, Kaye, W, Geliebter, A
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2015;35(41):13868-78
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
While food intake is critical for survival, adaptive decision-making can be altered through various mechanisms and eventually lead to disordered eating patterns. Feeding behaviour is dependent on homeostatic rules, motivational drives, biological predispositions and external stressors. This complex web elucidates how humans can decide to satisfy or abstain from hunger cues, and the underlying mechanisms of this behaviour have been increasingly explored. This review summarises the overall neural circuitry in restrictive food choice and binge eating. Serotonergic systems play a key role in eating disorders because they are involved in responses to stress, emotions and feeding behaviour. The decision to overeat or abstain from eating is a reward, and this goal-directed and persistent behaviour mirror some aspects of drug dependence. This review found that voluntary processes in the nervous system could be modified to predominate over homeostatic control of hunger. Eating disorders may emerge when serotonin neurons reach their limit of adaptive capacities, potentially to the extent of compromised survival. This study provides a basis for developing more effective interventions for this population.
Abstract
Adaptive decision making to eat is crucial for survival, but in anorexia nervosa, the brain persistently supports reduced food intake despite a growing need for energy. How the brain persists in reducing food intake, sometimes even to the point of death and despite the evolution of multiple mechanisms to ensure survival by governing adaptive eating behaviors, remains mysterious. Neural substrates belong to the reward-habit system, which could differ among the eating disorders. The present review provides an overview of neural circuitry of restrictive food choice, binge eating, and the contribution of specific serotonin receptors. One possibility is that restrictive food intake critically engages goal-directed (decision making) systems and "habit," supporting the view that persistent caloric restriction mimics some aspects of addiction to drugs of abuse. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT An improved understanding of the neural basis of eating disorders is a timely challenge because these disorders can be deadly. Up to 70 million of people in the world suffer from eating disorders. Anorexia nervosa affects 1-4% of women in United States and is the first cause of death among adolescents in Europe. Studies relying on animal models suggest that decision making to eat (or not) can prevail over actual energy requirements due to emotional disturbances resulting in abnormal habitual behavior, mimicking dependence. These recent studies provide a foundation for developing more specific and effective interventions for these disorders.
3.
Locus of control and obesity.
Neymotin, F, Nemzer, LR
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2014;5:159
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Obesity is a multifactorial disease, which makes it a complicated issue to address. In particular psychology and a concept know as locus of control plays a huge role. Locus of control refers to an individual’s ability to acknowledge that their environment and choices are under their control. However, whether this is a cause of obesity or mutually occurring is unclear. This review of 49 papers aimed to determine the relationship between obesity and locus of control. The authors discussed that the majority of literature agrees on a correlation between locus of control and obesity, however it is not straight forward as there is no set definition for locus of control. Whether locus of control causes obesity or obesity causes locus of control was also difficult to determine, but it was stated that locus of control is difficult to change. The mechanisms behind causation were discussed and stress hormones and hormones which make you feel full or hungry were implicated. It was concluded that there is a correlation between locus of control and obesity, however which one is causal, still needs more research. This paper could be used by healthcare practitioners to understand the important role that psychology plays in the development of obesity.
Abstract
In the developed world, the hazards associated with obesity have largely outstripped the risk of starvation. Obesity remains a difficult public health issue to address, due in large part to the many disciplines involved. A full understanding requires knowledge in the fields of genetics, endocrinology, psychology, sociology, economics, and public policy - among others. In this short review, which serves as an introduction to the Frontiers in Endocrinology research topic, we address one cross-disciplinary relationship: the interaction between the hunger/satiation neural circuitry, an individual's perceived locus of control, and the risk for obesity. Mammals have evolved a complex system for modulating energy intake. Overlaid on this, in humans, there exists a wide variation in "perceived locus of control" - that is, the extent to which an individual believes to be in charge of the events that affect them. Whether one has primarily an internal or external locus of control itself affects, and is affected by, external and physiological factors and has been correlated with the risk for obesity. Thus, the path from hunger and satiation to an individual's actual behavior may often be moderated by psychological factors, included among which is locus of control.