-
1.
Sleep, Stress, and Symptoms Among People With Heart Failure During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
O'Connell, M, Jeon, S, Conley, S, Linsky, S, Redeker, NS
The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. 202301;38(2):E55-E60
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about the effects of stress on mental health and sleep deficiency. Cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has been shown to improve sleep quality and insomnia severity, as well as anxiety and depression, and may be protective during times of stress, including the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to examine changes in sleep, sleep-related cognitions, stress, anxiety, and depression among people with heart failure (HF). This study was a randomised controlled trial of the effects of CBT-I compared with HF self-management education (attention-control condition), the “HeartSleep Study.” Results showed that improvements in insomnia severity, sleep quality, latency, and efficiency, sleep-related cognitions and stress, anxiety, and depression after participation in CBT-I or an HF self-management class were sustained during the pandemic. Authors conclude that their findings confirm the clinical benefits of CBT-I for people with HF and comorbidities and also suggest the potential benefits of HF self-management education.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic raised concerns about the effects of stress on sleep and mental health, particularly among people with chronic conditions, including people with heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to examine changes in sleep, sleep-related cognitions, stress, anxiety, and depression among people with HF who participated in a randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Participants self-reported sleep characteristics, symptoms, mood, and stress at baseline, 6 months after cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia or HF self-management education (attention control), and during the pandemic. RESULTS The sample included 112 participants (mean age, 63 ± 12.9 years; 47% women; 13% Black; 68% New York Heart Association class II or III). Statistically significant improvements in sleep, stress, mood, and symptoms that occurred 6 months post treatment were sustained during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Improving sleep and symptoms among people with HF may improve coping during stressful events, and cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia may be protective.
-
2.
Sleep disruption and activation of cellular inflammation mediate heightened pain sensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.
Irwin, MR, Olmstead, R, Bjurstrom, MF, Finan, PH, Smith, MT
Pain. 2023;164(5):1128-1137
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sleep disturbance is associated with elevated levels of inflammation. Experimental studies have found that even a modest amount of sleep loss activates inflammatory processes. Experimental sleep disruption also induces alterations in sleep architecture including loss of slow wave or N3 sleep and loss of rapid eye movement sleep. The aim of this study was to clarify whether changes in the amount of N3 sleep and cellular inflammation mediate thermal pain sensitivity (i.e., heat pain threshold) in response to experimental sleep disruption. This study was a secondary analysis (assessor-blind) of a randomised controlled trial. The enrolled participants were randomised to 1 of 2 groups: 2 nights of undisturbed sleep (US) and 2 nights of sleep disruption or forced awakening (FA). Participants underwent 2 consecutive nights of US (or FA), followed by a 2-week washout interval in their home environment, and then completed 2 consecutive nights of the opposing sleep condition FA (or US). Results showed that in healthy adults, experimental disruption of sleep due to the administration of FA induced a significant decrease in heat pain threshold, as compared with responses after US. Experimental manipulation of sleep with FA also led to disturbance in sleep continuity and changes in sleep architecture, including loss of N3 sleep. Moreover, in the morning after FA, there was a robust activation of cellular inflammation Authors conclude that the differential loss of N3 sleep and increases in cellular inflammation may be important drivers of pain sensitivity in response to sleep disruption.
Abstract
Sleep loss heightens pain sensitivity, but the pathways underlying this association are not known. Given that experimental sleep disruption induces increases in cellular inflammation as well as selective loss of slow wave, N3 sleep, this study examined whether these mechanisms contribute to pain sensitivity following sleep loss in healthy adults. This assessor-blinded, cross-over sleep condition, single-site, randomized clinical trial enrolled 95 healthy adults (mean [SD] age, 27.8 [6.4]; female, 44 [53.7%]). The 2 sleep conditions were 2 nights of undisturbed sleep (US) and 2 nights of sleep disruption or forced awakening (FA, 8 pseudorandomly distributed awakenings and 200 minutes wake time during the 8-hour sleep opportunity), administered in a cross-over design after 2 weeks of washout and in a random order (FA-US; US-FA). Primary outcome was heat pain threshold (hPTH). Sleep architecture was assessed by polysomnography, and morning levels of cellular inflammation were evaluated by Toll-like receptor-4 stimulated monocyte intracellular proinflammatory cytokine production. As compared with US, FA was associated with decreases in the amount of slow wave or N3 sleep ( P < 0.001), increases in Toll-like receptor-4 stimulated production of interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α ( P = 0.03), and decreases in hPTH ( P = 0.02). A comprehensive causal mediation analysis found that FA had an indirect effect on hPTH by decreases in N3 sleep and subsequent increases in inflammation (estimate=-0.15; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to -0.03; P < 0.05) with the proportion mediated 34.9%. Differential loss of slow wave, N3 sleep, and increases in cellular inflammation are important drivers of pain sensitivity after sleep disruption.Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01794689.
-
3.
A Large Randomized Trial: Effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) for Breast Cancer (BC) Survivors on Salivary Cortisol and IL-6.
Lengacher, CA, Reich, RR, Paterson, CL, Shelton, M, Shivers, S, Ramesar, S, Pleasant, ML, Budhrani-Shani, P, Groer, M, Post-White, J, et al
Biological research for nursing. 2019;21(1):39-49
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience physiological and psychological stressors related to their diagnosis and treatment, and a disruption of cortisol function can affect cancer risk and progression. Increased levels of the stress hormone cortisol and interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pro-inflammatory immune mediator, have been associated with acute and chronic stress levels. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is a clinical stress-reducing program, which has been found to decrease psychological and physical symptoms associated with stress. The purpose of this randomised study, involving 299 BCS, was to evaluate the efficacy of MBSR in reducing cortisol and IL-6 levels, compared to a usual-care control treatment. Statistically significant reductions in cortisol levels were seen after the delivery of the MBSR program at both time points (week 1 and 6), and at week 6 only for IL-6. There was no significant difference in change in cortisol or IL6 levels over time between the MBSR and the usual-care groups. An association was observed between levels of IL-6 and psychological and physical symptoms and quality of life, but not for cortisol. The authors conclude that MBSR can alleviate the stress response in the short term for breast cancer survivors.
Abstract
Breast cancer survivors (BCS) often experience psychological and physiological symptoms after cancer treatment. Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), a complementary and alternative therapy, has reduced subjective measures of stress, anxiety, and fatigue among BCS. Little is known, however, about how MBSR affects objective markers of stress, specifically the stress hormone cortisol and the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6). In the present study, BCS ( N = 322) were randomly assigned to a 6-week MBSR program for BC or usual-care control. Measurements of cortisol, IL-6, symptoms, and quality of life were obtained at orientation and 6 weeks. Cortisol and IL-6 were also measured prior to and after the MBSR(BC) class Weeks 1 and 6. The mean age of participants was 56.6 years and 69.4% were White non-Hispanic. Most had Stage I (33.8%) or II (35.7%) BC, and 35.7% had received chemotherapy and radiation. Cortisol levels were reduced immediately following MBSR(BC) class compared to before the class Weeks 1 and 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .52-.56). IL-6 was significantly reduced from pre- to postclass at Week 6 (Wilcoxon-signed rank test; p < .01, d = .21). No differences were observed between the MBSR(BC) and control groups from baseline to Week 6 using linear mixed models. Significant relationships with small effect sizes were observed between IL-6 and both symptoms and quality of life in both groups. Results support the use of MBSR(BC) to reduce salivary cortisol and IL-6 levels in the short term in BCS.
-
4.
The Sleep-Immune Crosstalk in Health and Disease.
Besedovsky, L, Lange, T, Haack, M
Physiological reviews. 2019;99(3):1325-1380
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The interaction between sleep and immunity is an established phenomena. This thorough review article summarises sleep changes in response to both infectious and non-infectious immune system challenges and describes the role of sleep in supporting the immune system. Details are provided of how sleep affects the innate immune system (first line, rapid defence against infection) as well as the adaptive immune system (second line, delayed defence against infection), using a feedback system which promotes host defence. Sleep is associated with reduced infection risk and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. Sleep deprivation is also associated with chronic, low-grade inflammation. Nutrition Practitioners wishing to support immunity can focus on sleep as a simple lifestyle measure to enhance resilience.
Abstract
Sleep and immunity are bidirectionally linked. Immune system activation alters sleep, and sleep in turn affects the innate and adaptive arm of our body's defense system. Stimulation of the immune system by microbial challenges triggers an inflammatory response, which, depending on its magnitude and time course, can induce an increase in sleep duration and intensity, but also a disruption of sleep. Enhancement of sleep during an infection is assumed to feedback to the immune system to promote host defense. Indeed, sleep affects various immune parameters, is associated with a reduced infection risk, and can improve infection outcome and vaccination responses. The induction of a hormonal constellation that supports immune functions is one likely mechanism underlying the immune-supporting effects of sleep. In the absence of an infectious challenge, sleep appears to promote inflammatory homeostasis through effects on several inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines. This notion is supported by findings that prolonged sleep deficiency (e.g., short sleep duration, sleep disturbance) can lead to chronic, systemic low-grade inflammation and is associated with various diseases that have an inflammatory component, like diabetes, atherosclerosis, and neurodegeneration. Here, we review available data on this regulatory sleep-immune crosstalk, point out methodological challenges, and suggest questions open for future research.
-
5.
Pharmaceutical Interventions in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Literature-based Commentary.
Richman, S, Morris, MC, Broderick, G, Craddock, TJA, Klimas, NG, Fletcher, MA
Clinical therapeutics. 2019;41(5):798-805
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/ CFS), is a disease characterized by an inability to exert oneself physically, often coupled with a combination of other symptoms, including sleep disorders, severe unpredictable pain, and compromised cognitive abilities. The aim of this review was to delineate a number of the more prominent treatments for ME/CFS into different categories and evaluate the methods and results of corresponding drug trials. Results indicate that: • antiviral drugs appear to show limited efficacy in treating ME/CFS over a broad demographic. • there is a lack of clinical research focusing on the use of specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors [analgesic] to treat ME/CFS. • antidepressants may be of use in delivering improvements in the quality of life of patients with ME/CFS. • recalibration of endocrine-immune regulation may be involved in supporting the persistence of ME/CFS and may be responsible at least in part for its resistance to single agent interventions. Authors conclude that there is a great need for larger, longitudinal studies focused on a more clearly defined subset of ME/CFS as well as a greater consideration of potential synergies between interventions and the suitability of combination therapies.
Abstract
Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating disorder characterized by prolonged periods of fatigue, chronic pain, depression, and a complex constellation of other symptoms. Currently, ME/CFS has no known cause, nor are the mechanisms of illness well understood. Therefore, with few exceptions, attempts to treat ME/CFS have been directed mainly toward symptom management. These treatments include antivirals, pain relievers, antidepressants, and oncologic agents as well as other single-intervention treatments. Results of these trials have been largely inconclusive and, in some cases, contradictory. Contributing factors include a lack of well-designed and -executed studies and the highly heterogeneous nature of ME/CFS, which has made a single etiology difficult to define. Because the majority of single-intervention treatments have shown little efficacy, it may instead be beneficial to explore broader-acting combination therapies in which a more focused precision-medicine approach is supported by a systems-level analysis of endocrine and immune co-regulation.
-
6.
Multiple risk-behavior profiles of smokers with serious mental illness and motivation for change.
Prochaska, JJ, Fromont, SC, Delucchi, K, Young-Wolff, KC, Benowitz, NL, Hall, S, Bonas, T, Hall, SM
Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 2014;33(12):1518-29
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are at greater risk for chronic disease, which are largely preventable through health behaviour change. Within this population tobacco use is a major health concern and recent trials have demonstrated treating tobacco dependence supports mental health recovery. As risk behaviours tend to co-occur, the aim of this study was to examine the behavioural risk profiles of adult smokers with SMI to further understand frequencies and patterns of risks in order to best inform interventional programmes. In the context of a tobacco-treatment trial, 693 adult smokers from inpatient psychiatry wards were recruited. The Staging Health Risk Assessment was used which screens for risk status and readiness to change 11 health behaviours. The findings of this study showed that most smokers with SMI engage in multiple risks including poor diet, inadequate sleep, physical inactivity and marijuana use. This study can help prioritise health intervention programme targets and provide further benefit for this population.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are dying on average 25 years prematurely. The leading causes are chronic preventable diseases. In the context of a tobacco-treatment trial, this exploratory study examined the behavioral risk profiles of adults with SMI to identify broader interventional needs. METHOD Recruited from five acute inpatient psychiatry units, participants were 693 adult smokers (recruitment rate = 76%, 50% male, 45% Caucasian, age M = 39, 49% had income < $10,000) diagnosed with mood disorders (71%), substance-use disorders (63%), posttraumatic stress disorder (39%), psychotic disorders (25%), and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (25%). The Staging Health Risk Assessment, the primary measure used in this study, screened for risk status and readiness to change 11 health behaviors, referencing the period prior to acute hospitalization. RESULTS Participants averaged 5.2 (SD = 2.1) risk behaviors, including smoking (100%), high-fat diet (68%), inadequate fruits/vegetables (67%), poor sleep (53%), physical inactivity (52%), and marijuana use (46%). The percent prepared to change ranged from 23% for tobacco and marijuana to 76% for depression management. Latent class analysis differentiated three risk groups: the global higher risk group included patients elevated on all risk behaviors; the global lower risk group was low on all risks; and a mood and metabolic risk group, characterized by inactivity, unhealthy diet, sleep problems, and poor stress and depression management. The global higher risk group (11% of sample) was younger, largely male, and had the greatest number of risk behaviors and mental health diagnoses; had the most severe psychopathologies, addiction-treatment histories, and nicotine dependence; and the lowest confidence for quitting smoking and commitment to abstinence. CONCLUSION Most smokers with SMI engaged in multiple risks. Expanding targets to treat co-occurring risks and personalizing treatment to individuals' multibehavioral profiles may increase intervention relevance, interest, and impact on health.
-
7.
Sleep restriction for 1 week reduces insulin sensitivity in healthy men.
Buxton, OM, Pavlova, M, Reid, EW, Wang, W, Simonson, DC, Adler, GK
Diabetes. 2010;59(9):2126-33
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Short sleep duration is associated with an increased risk of many chronic diseases including diabetes, however the effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not yet been established. The aim of study was to assess the effects of decreased sleep duration on insulin sensitivity in a controlled environment. This 12-day inpatient study included 20 healthy men who were randmoised to receive a wakefulness-promoting drug, modafinil, or placebo during the sleep restriction phase. This study showed that sleep restriction for one week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity. These findings raise concerns about chronic insufficient sleep on the development of metabolic diseases and promote further research into these effects.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short sleep duration is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes. The effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not been established. This study tests the hypothesis that decreasing nighttime sleep duration reduces insulin sensitivity and assesses the effects of a drug, modafinil, that increases alertness during wakefulness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 12-day inpatient General Clinical Research Center study included 20 healthy men (age 20-35 years and BMI 20-30 kg/m(2)). Subjects spent 10 h/night in bed for >or=8 nights including three inpatient nights (sleep-replete condition), followed by 5 h/night in bed for 7 nights (sleep-restricted condition). Subjects received 300 mg/day modafinil or placebo during sleep restriction. Diet and activity were controlled. On the last 2 days of each condition, we assessed glucose metabolism by intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Salivary cortisol, 24-h urinary catecholamines, and neurobehavioral performance were measured. RESULTS IVGTT-derived insulin sensitivity was reduced by (means +/- SD) 20 +/- 24% after sleep restriction (P = 0.001), without significant alterations in the insulin secretory response. Similarly, insulin sensitivity assessed by clamp was reduced by 11 +/- 5.5% (P < 0.04) after sleep restriction. Glucose tolerance and the disposition index were reduced by sleep restriction. These outcomes were not affected by modafinil treatment. Changes in insulin sensitivity did not correlate with changes in salivary cortisol (increase of 51 +/- 8% with sleep restriction, P < 0.02), urinary catecholamines, or slow wave sleep. CONCLUSIONS Sleep restriction (5 h/night) for 1 week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity, raising concerns about effects of chronic insufficient sleep on disease processes associated with insulin resistance.
-
8.
Exposure to recurrent sleep restriction in the setting of high caloric intake and physical inactivity results in increased insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance.
Nedeltcheva, AV, Kessler, L, Imperial, J, Penev, PD
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2009;94(9):3242-50
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disease influenced by genetic, environmental, metabolic and behavioural factors and is a rising burden in Westernised societies. Whether reduced sleep duration, in the context of a Western lifestyle, is associated with an increased incidence of T2D is unclear and available evidence is limited. The aim of this crossover study was to determine whether sleep restriction may result in a decreased glucose tolerance and reduced insulin secretion in 11 healthy middle-aged adults. Participants were restricted to 5.5 hours of sleep per night and glucose challenges and circulating plasma concentrations were used to measure hormonal and metabolic parameters. This study showed that recurrent short sleep times may facilitate the development of insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance. These findings suggest that combining the adverse metabolic effects of a Western lifestyle with chronically reduced sleep duration may increase the long-term risk of developing T2D.
Abstract
CONTEXT Epidemiological data indicate that reduced sleep duration is associated with increased incidence of type-2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that, when part of a Western-like lifestyle, recurrent bedtime restriction may result in decreased glucose tolerance and reduced insulin secretion and action. DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a randomized crossover study at a university clinical research center and sleep research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Eleven healthy volunteers (five females and six males) with a mean (+/-sd) age of 39 +/- 5 yr and body mass index of 26.5 +/- 1.5 kg/m(2) participated in the study. INTERVENTION The study included two 14-d periods of controlled exposure to sedentary living with ad libitum food intake and 5.5- or 8.5-h bedtimes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Oral and iv glucose challenges were used to obtain measures of glucose tolerance, glucose effectiveness, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity at the end of each intervention. Secondary measures included circulating concentrations of the glucose counter-regulatory hormones, cortisol, GH, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. RESULTS Bedtime restriction reduced daily sleep by 122 +/- 25 min. Both study periods were associated with comparable weight gain; however, recurrent sleep restriction resulted in reduced oral glucose tolerance (2-h glucose value, 144 +/- 25 vs. 132 +/- 36 mg/dl; P < 0.01) and insulin sensitivity [3.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.6 (mU/liter)(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.03], and increased glucose effectiveness (0.023 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.020 +/- 0.005 min(-1); P < 0.04). Although 24-h cortisol and GH concentrations did not change, there was a modest increase in 24-h epinephrine and nighttime norepinephrine levels during the 5.5-h bedtime condition. CONCLUSIONS Experimental bedtime restriction, designed to approximate the short sleep times experienced by many individuals in Westernized societies, may facilitate the development of insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance.