0
selected
-
1.
The impact of sleeping with reduced glycogen stores on immunity and sleep in triathletes.
Louis, J, Marquet, LA, Tiollier, E, Bermon, S, Hausswirth, C, Brisswalter, J
European journal of applied physiology. 2016;116(10):1941-54
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Endurance athletes are increasingly using training strategies focused on low glycogen availability in attempt to improve performance. It is well known, however, that increasing training stress could influence immune function and increase the risk of illness or injury. In endurance sports, training load, nutrient intake and sleep are key factors in modulating immune function. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a 3-week training strategy involving lowered glycogen availability overnight on immune function, upper respiratory tract infections and sleep patterns in 21 trained endurance athletes. This study found that reduced glycogen availability resulted in significantly faster 10km running times, and found no significant changes in the recorded immunity markers. Based on this study, the authors conclude that reduced glycogen availability has no deleterious impact on immune function.
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the effects of a 3-week dietary periodization on immunity and sleep in triathletes. METHODS 21 triathletes were divided into two groups with different nutritional guidelines during a 3-week endurance training program including nine twice a day sessions with lowered (SL group) or maintained (CON group) glycogen availability during the overnight recovery period. In addition to performance tests, sleep was monitored every night. Systemic and mucosal immune parameters as well as the incidence of URTI were monitored every week of the training/nutrition protocol. Two-ways ANOVA and effect sizes were used to examine differences in dependent variables between groups at each time point. RESULTS The SL group significantly improved 10 km running performance (-1 min 13 s, P < 0.01, d = 0.38), whereas no improvement was recorded in the CON group (-2 s, NS). No significant changes in white blood cells counts, plasma cortisol and IL-6 were recorded over the protocol in both groups. The vitamin D status decreased in similar proportions between groups, whereas salivary IgA decreased in the SL group only (P < 0.05, d = 0.23). The incidence of URTI was not altered in both groups. All participants in both groups went to bed earlier during the training program (SL -20 min, CON -27 min, P < 0.05, d = 0.28). In the SL group, only sleep efficiency slightly decreased by 1.1 % (P < 0.05, d = 0.25) and the fragmentation index tended to increase at the end of the protocol (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION Sleeping and training the next morning regularly with reduced glycogen availability has minimal effects on selected markers of immunity, the incidence of URTI and sleeping patterns in trained athletes.
-
2.
Multiple risk-behavior profiles of smokers with serious mental illness and motivation for change.
Prochaska, JJ, Fromont, SC, Delucchi, K, Young-Wolff, KC, Benowitz, NL, Hall, S, Bonas, T, Hall, SM
Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 2014;33(12):1518-29
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are at greater risk for chronic disease, which are largely preventable through health behaviour change. Within this population tobacco use is a major health concern and recent trials have demonstrated treating tobacco dependence supports mental health recovery. As risk behaviours tend to co-occur, the aim of this study was to examine the behavioural risk profiles of adult smokers with SMI to further understand frequencies and patterns of risks in order to best inform interventional programmes. In the context of a tobacco-treatment trial, 693 adult smokers from inpatient psychiatry wards were recruited. The Staging Health Risk Assessment was used which screens for risk status and readiness to change 11 health behaviours. The findings of this study showed that most smokers with SMI engage in multiple risks including poor diet, inadequate sleep, physical inactivity and marijuana use. This study can help prioritise health intervention programme targets and provide further benefit for this population.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) are dying on average 25 years prematurely. The leading causes are chronic preventable diseases. In the context of a tobacco-treatment trial, this exploratory study examined the behavioral risk profiles of adults with SMI to identify broader interventional needs. METHOD Recruited from five acute inpatient psychiatry units, participants were 693 adult smokers (recruitment rate = 76%, 50% male, 45% Caucasian, age M = 39, 49% had income < $10,000) diagnosed with mood disorders (71%), substance-use disorders (63%), posttraumatic stress disorder (39%), psychotic disorders (25%), and attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder (25%). The Staging Health Risk Assessment, the primary measure used in this study, screened for risk status and readiness to change 11 health behaviors, referencing the period prior to acute hospitalization. RESULTS Participants averaged 5.2 (SD = 2.1) risk behaviors, including smoking (100%), high-fat diet (68%), inadequate fruits/vegetables (67%), poor sleep (53%), physical inactivity (52%), and marijuana use (46%). The percent prepared to change ranged from 23% for tobacco and marijuana to 76% for depression management. Latent class analysis differentiated three risk groups: the global higher risk group included patients elevated on all risk behaviors; the global lower risk group was low on all risks; and a mood and metabolic risk group, characterized by inactivity, unhealthy diet, sleep problems, and poor stress and depression management. The global higher risk group (11% of sample) was younger, largely male, and had the greatest number of risk behaviors and mental health diagnoses; had the most severe psychopathologies, addiction-treatment histories, and nicotine dependence; and the lowest confidence for quitting smoking and commitment to abstinence. CONCLUSION Most smokers with SMI engaged in multiple risks. Expanding targets to treat co-occurring risks and personalizing treatment to individuals' multibehavioral profiles may increase intervention relevance, interest, and impact on health.
-
3.
Sleep restriction increases the neuronal response to unhealthy food in normal-weight individuals.
St-Onge, MP, Wolfe, S, Sy, M, Shechter, A, Hirsch, J
International journal of obesity (2005). 2014;38(3):411-6
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sleep patterns influence eating behaviour and the body’s response to food. Previous studies suggest that short sleep duration leads to increased caloric intake and a desire for high-fat foods, however the specific neural mechanisms explaining how sleep restriction modulates this response is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether a specific area of the brain is activated in response to unhealthy compared with healthy foods. 25 participants were included, all of which were normal weight and had normal sleeping patterns. Each participant was tested after five nights of either 4 or 9 hours in bed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The test was performed while the participant was shown healthy and unhealthy food photos in the fasted state. This study found that after a period of restricted sleep compared with habitual sleep, unhealthy foods led to greater activation in brain regions associated with reward compared with healthy foods. This finding provides a model of neuronal mechanisms relating short sleep duration to obesity and cardio-metabolic risk factors and warrants further investigation.
Abstract
CONTEXT Sleep restriction alters responses to food. However, the underlying neural mechanisms for this effect are not well understood. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a neural system that is preferentially activated in response to unhealthy compared with healthy foods. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five normal-weight individuals, who normally slept 7-9 h per night, completed both phases of this randomized controlled study. INTERVENTION Each participant was tested after a period of five nights of either 4 or 9 h in bed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed in the fasted state, presenting healthy and unhealthy food stimuli and objects in a block design. Neuronal responses to unhealthy, relative to healthy food stimuli after each sleep period were assessed and compared. RESULTS After a period of restricted sleep, viewing unhealthy foods led to greater activation in the superior and middle temporal gyri, middle and superior frontal gyri, left inferior parietal lobule, orbitofrontal cortex, and right insula compared with healthy foods. These same stimuli presented after a period of habitual sleep did not produce marked activity patterns specific to unhealthy foods. Further, food intake during restricted sleep increased in association with a relative decrease in brain oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) activity observed in the right insula. CONCLUSION This inverse relationship between insula activity and food intake and enhanced activation in brain reward and food-sensitive centers in response to unhealthy foods provides a model of neuronal mechanisms relating short sleep duration to obesity.
-
4.
Nighttime snacking reduces whole body fat oxidation and increases LDL cholesterol in healthy young women.
Hibi, M, Masumoto, A, Naito, Y, Kiuchi, K, Yoshimoto, Y, Matsumoto, M, Katashima, M, Oka, J, Ikemoto, S
American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology. 2013;304(2):R94-R101
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Night eating syndrome (NES) is defined by night time eating (25% or more of the total energy of the day is consumed after the evening meal or by waking up in the middle of the night to eat at least three times per week). Research suggests that it is associated with obesity and a higher BMI. Those with NES may have higher glucose and insulin levels, and lower levels of ghrelin during the night compared to those without NES. This randomised crossover study aimed to explore the impact of nighttime eating on energy, glucose and lipid metabolism in normal weight young women. Participants were asked to either complete a 2 week nighttime snacking intervention or a daytime snacking intervention. The snack represented 10% of the average energy requirement (1950 k/cal per day) with a protein:fat:carbohydrate ratio of 5:50:45. The study found no impact of nighttime snacking on body weight, energy expenditure or glucose metabolism compared to daytime snacking. However, it did find a decrease in fat oxidation and increases in total and LDL cholesterol. Hunger levels before lunch were also higher during the nighttime snacking intervention.
Abstract
The increase in obesity and lipid disorders in industrialized countries may be due to irregular eating patterns. Few studies have investigated the effects of nighttime snacking on energy metabolism. We examined the effects of nighttime snacking for 13 days on energy metabolism. Eleven healthy women (means ± SD; age: 23 ± 1 yr; body mass index: 20.6 ± 2.6 kg/m(2)) participated in this randomized crossover trial for a 13-day intervention period. Subjects consumed a specified snack (192.4 ± 18.3 kcal) either during the daytime (10:00) or the night time (23:00) for 13 days. On day 14, energy metabolism was measured in a respiratory chamber without snack consumption. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed on day 15. Relative to daytime snacking, nighttime snacking significantly decreased fat oxidation (daytime snacking: 52.0 ± 13.6 g/day; nighttime snacking: 45.8 ± 14.0 g/day; P = 0.02) and tended to increase the respiratory quotient (daytime snacking: 0.878 ± 0.022; nighttime snacking: 0.888 ± 0.021; P = 0.09). The frequency of snack intake and energy intake, body weight, and energy expenditure were not affected. Total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol significantly increased after nighttime snacking (152 ± 26 mg/dl and 161 ± 29 mg/dl; P = 0.03 and 76 ± 20 mg/dl and 83 ± 24 mg/dl; P = 0.01, respectively), but glucose and insulin levels after the glucose load were not affected. Nighttime snacking increased total and LDL cholesterol and reduced fat oxidation, suggesting that eating at night changes fat metabolism and increases the risk of obesity.
-
5.
Dietary intake following experimentally restricted sleep in adolescents.
Beebe, DW, Simon, S, Summer, S, Hemmer, S, Strotman, D, Dolan, LM
Sleep. 2013;36(6):827-34
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity in adolescents and adults has become a well recognised public health hazard. In this study the relationship of restricted sleep and consumption of high glycemic index foods, in particular sweets and desserts, was measured in adolescents. A 3-week experimental sleep manipulation protocol was designed. The order of experimental conditions was counterbalanced across participants in a randomised crossover design. All participants sleep time was in their home setting and was monitored via a daily sleep diary. No instructions were given regarding diet except to limit caffeine and energy drinks. Data was collected through sleep watches and the teens were instructed to wear the watch only during sleep time and throughout the night. A 24-hour diet recall was done at the end of each week. The results of the study showed that there was increased consumption of desserts and sweets during restricted sleep. The diets of adolescents after several nights of sleep restriction were characterised by higher glycemic index and glycemic load, as well as a trend toward high consumption of calories and carbohydrates. Sleep restriction may lead to to changes in dietary choices and dietary behaviour that may have long term negative impact on health.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To examine the relationship between sleep and dietary intake in adolescents using an experimental sleep restriction protocol. DESIGN Randomized crossover sleep restriction-extension paradigm. SETTING Sleep obtained and monitored at home, diet measured during an office visit. PARTICIPANTS Forty-one typically developing adolescents age 14-16 years. INTERVENTIONS The 3-week protocol consisting of a baseline week designed to stabilize the circadian rhythm, followed randomly by 5 consecutive nights of sleep restriction (6.5 hours in bed Monday-Friday) versus healthy sleep duration (10 hours in bed), a 2-night washout period, and a 5-night crossover period. MEASUREMENTS Sleep was monitored via actigraphy and teens completed validated 24-hour diet recall interviews following each experimental condition. RESULTS Paired-sample t-tests examined differences between conditions for consumption of key macronutrients and choices from dietary categories. Compared with the healthy sleep condition, sleep-restricted adolescents' diets were characterized by higher glycemic index and glycemic load and a trend toward more calories and carbohydrates, with no differences in fat or protein consumption. Exploratory analyses revealed the consumption of significantly more desserts and sweets during sleep restriction than healthy sleep. CONCLUSIONS Chronic sleep restriction during adolescence appears to cause increased consumption of foods with a high glycemic index, particularly desserts/sweets. The chronic sleep restriction common in adolescence may cause changes in dietary behaviors that increase risk of obesity and associated morbidity.
-
6.
Sleep restriction for 1 week reduces insulin sensitivity in healthy men.
Buxton, OM, Pavlova, M, Reid, EW, Wang, W, Simonson, DC, Adler, GK
Diabetes. 2010;59(9):2126-33
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Short sleep duration is associated with an increased risk of many chronic diseases including diabetes, however the effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not yet been established. The aim of study was to assess the effects of decreased sleep duration on insulin sensitivity in a controlled environment. This 12-day inpatient study included 20 healthy men who were randmoised to receive a wakefulness-promoting drug, modafinil, or placebo during the sleep restriction phase. This study showed that sleep restriction for one week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity. These findings raise concerns about chronic insufficient sleep on the development of metabolic diseases and promote further research into these effects.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Short sleep duration is associated with impaired glucose tolerance and an increased risk of diabetes. The effects of sleep restriction on insulin sensitivity have not been established. This study tests the hypothesis that decreasing nighttime sleep duration reduces insulin sensitivity and assesses the effects of a drug, modafinil, that increases alertness during wakefulness. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 12-day inpatient General Clinical Research Center study included 20 healthy men (age 20-35 years and BMI 20-30 kg/m(2)). Subjects spent 10 h/night in bed for >or=8 nights including three inpatient nights (sleep-replete condition), followed by 5 h/night in bed for 7 nights (sleep-restricted condition). Subjects received 300 mg/day modafinil or placebo during sleep restriction. Diet and activity were controlled. On the last 2 days of each condition, we assessed glucose metabolism by intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) and euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp. Salivary cortisol, 24-h urinary catecholamines, and neurobehavioral performance were measured. RESULTS IVGTT-derived insulin sensitivity was reduced by (means +/- SD) 20 +/- 24% after sleep restriction (P = 0.001), without significant alterations in the insulin secretory response. Similarly, insulin sensitivity assessed by clamp was reduced by 11 +/- 5.5% (P < 0.04) after sleep restriction. Glucose tolerance and the disposition index were reduced by sleep restriction. These outcomes were not affected by modafinil treatment. Changes in insulin sensitivity did not correlate with changes in salivary cortisol (increase of 51 +/- 8% with sleep restriction, P < 0.02), urinary catecholamines, or slow wave sleep. CONCLUSIONS Sleep restriction (5 h/night) for 1 week significantly reduces insulin sensitivity, raising concerns about effects of chronic insufficient sleep on disease processes associated with insulin resistance.
-
7.
Exposure to recurrent sleep restriction in the setting of high caloric intake and physical inactivity results in increased insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance.
Nedeltcheva, AV, Kessler, L, Imperial, J, Penev, PD
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2009;94(9):3242-50
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Type-2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disease influenced by genetic, environmental, metabolic and behavioural factors and is a rising burden in Westernised societies. Whether reduced sleep duration, in the context of a Western lifestyle, is associated with an increased incidence of T2D is unclear and available evidence is limited. The aim of this crossover study was to determine whether sleep restriction may result in a decreased glucose tolerance and reduced insulin secretion in 11 healthy middle-aged adults. Participants were restricted to 5.5 hours of sleep per night and glucose challenges and circulating plasma concentrations were used to measure hormonal and metabolic parameters. This study showed that recurrent short sleep times may facilitate the development of insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance. These findings suggest that combining the adverse metabolic effects of a Western lifestyle with chronically reduced sleep duration may increase the long-term risk of developing T2D.
Abstract
CONTEXT Epidemiological data indicate that reduced sleep duration is associated with increased incidence of type-2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that, when part of a Western-like lifestyle, recurrent bedtime restriction may result in decreased glucose tolerance and reduced insulin secretion and action. DESIGN AND SETTING We conducted a randomized crossover study at a university clinical research center and sleep research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS Eleven healthy volunteers (five females and six males) with a mean (+/-sd) age of 39 +/- 5 yr and body mass index of 26.5 +/- 1.5 kg/m(2) participated in the study. INTERVENTION The study included two 14-d periods of controlled exposure to sedentary living with ad libitum food intake and 5.5- or 8.5-h bedtimes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Oral and iv glucose challenges were used to obtain measures of glucose tolerance, glucose effectiveness, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity at the end of each intervention. Secondary measures included circulating concentrations of the glucose counter-regulatory hormones, cortisol, GH, epinephrine, and norepinephrine. RESULTS Bedtime restriction reduced daily sleep by 122 +/- 25 min. Both study periods were associated with comparable weight gain; however, recurrent sleep restriction resulted in reduced oral glucose tolerance (2-h glucose value, 144 +/- 25 vs. 132 +/- 36 mg/dl; P < 0.01) and insulin sensitivity [3.3 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.0 +/- 1.6 (mU/liter)(-1) x min(-1); P < 0.03], and increased glucose effectiveness (0.023 +/- 0.005 vs. 0.020 +/- 0.005 min(-1); P < 0.04). Although 24-h cortisol and GH concentrations did not change, there was a modest increase in 24-h epinephrine and nighttime norepinephrine levels during the 5.5-h bedtime condition. CONCLUSIONS Experimental bedtime restriction, designed to approximate the short sleep times experienced by many individuals in Westernized societies, may facilitate the development of insulin resistance and reduced glucose tolerance.