-
1.
Yoga for anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Cramer, H, Lauche, R, Anheyer, D, Pilkington, K, de Manincor, M, Dobos, G, Ward, L
Depression and anxiety. 2018;35(9):830-843
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
While temporary anxiety is a natural response, excessive and prolonged anxiety can lead to a wide range of physical symptoms and behavior changes. Current treatment options include psychological approaches and medication, however many individuals experiencing anxiety choose to self-manage their condition. Yoga has become a popular approach to improve emotional well-being, and based on a recent study, yoga practitioners have reported managing stress and anxiety as one of the main reasons for practicing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to review the effectiveness and safety of yoga for anxiety. Eight studies with 319 participants were included in this systematic review. Among these studies, no effects were found for patients with anxiety disorders diagnosed by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) criteria, only for patients without a formal diagnosis. Based on these results, the authors conclude yoga may be beneficial in the short-term for individuals with elevated levels of anxiety, however there was no conclusive evidence for individuals when only DSM-diagnosed anxiety disorders were considered. These findings warrant further studies to better understand the connection between mindfulness practices and anxiety.
Abstract
Yoga has become a popular approach to improve emotional health. The aim of this review was to systematically assess and meta-analyze the effectiveness and safety of yoga for anxiety. Medline/PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and IndMED were searched through October 2016 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of yoga for individuals with anxiety disorders or elevated levels of anxiety. The primary outcomes were anxiety and remission rates, and secondary outcomes were depression, quality of life, and safety. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Eight RCTs with 319 participants (mean age: 30.0-38.5 years) were included. Risk of selection bias was unclear for most RCTs. Meta-analyses revealed evidence for small short-term effects of yoga on anxiety compared to no treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.74, -0.11; P = .008), and large effects compared to active comparators (SMD = -0.86; 95% CI = -1.56, -0.15; P = .02). Small effects on depression were found compared to no treatment (SMD = -0.35; 95% CI = -0.66, -0.04; P = .03). Effects were robust against potential methodological bias. No effects were found for patients with anxiety disorders diagnosed by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual criteria, only for patients diagnosed by other methods, and for individuals with elevated levels of anxiety without a formal diagnosis. Only three RCTs reported safety-related data but these indicated that yoga was not associated with increased injuries. In conclusion, yoga might be an effective and safe intervention for individuals with elevated levels of anxiety. There was inconclusive evidence for effects of yoga in anxiety disorders. More high-quality studies are needed and are warranted given these preliminary findings and plausible mechanisms of action.
-
2.
Anxiety, Depression, and the Microbiome: A Role for Gut Peptides.
Lach, G, Schellekens, H, Dinan, TG, Cryan, JF
Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2018;15(1):36-59
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Hormones released in the gut can have an impact in the brain through a bidirectional relationship, known as the gut-brain axis. The release of these hormones may be controlled by the gut microbiota, however exact mechanisms are not fully understood. Most hormones originating in the gut may have a role in obesity development, which is often associated with psychiatric disorders. Understanding the relationship between gut microbiota and depression through gut derived signalling molecules may be of benefit and was the focus of this review. Diversity and stability of the gut microbiota is important for health, which is disrupted during depression and anxiety. The gut microbiota serves to produce brain, hormone and immune signals that can travel to the brain, and can be affected by poor gut health. For those with depression, side effects of anti-depressants can be a disruption of the gut microbiota, however how this impacts symptoms is not fully understood. It was concluded that although there is strong research on the gut microbiota and depression it is still in its infancy. The role of gut microbiota on signalling with the brain and the rest of the body seems to be important for depression and anxiety. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand how the gut microbiota can play a role in depression.
Abstract
The complex bidirectional communication between the gut and the brain is finely orchestrated by different systems, including the endocrine, immune, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems. Moreover, increasing evidence supports the role of the microbiome and microbiota-derived molecules in regulating such interactions; however, the mechanisms underpinning such effects are only beginning to be resolved. Microbiota-gut peptide interactions are poised to be of great significance in the regulation of gut-brain signaling. Given the emerging role of the gut-brain axis in a variety of brain disorders, such as anxiety and depression, it is important to understand the contribution of bidirectional interactions between peptide hormones released from the gut and intestinal bacteria in the context of this axis. Indeed, the gastrointestinal tract is the largest endocrine organ in mammals, secreting dozens of different signaling molecules, including peptides. Gut peptides in the systemic circulation can bind cognate receptors on immune cells and vagus nerve terminals thereby enabling indirect gut-brain communication. Gut peptide concentrations are not only modulated by enteric microbiota signals, but also vary according to the composition of the intestinal microbiota. In this review, we will discuss the gut microbiota as a regulator of anxiety and depression, and explore the role of gut-derived peptides as signaling molecules in microbiome-gut-brain communication. Here, we summarize the potential interactions of the microbiota with gut hormones and endocrine peptides, including neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, pancreatic polypeptide, cholecystokinin, glucagon-like peptide, corticotropin-releasing factor, oxytocin, and ghrelin in microbiome-to-brain signaling. Together, gut peptides are important regulators of microbiota-gut-brain signaling in health and stress-related psychiatric illnesses.
-
3.
Recognizing Depression from the Microbiota⁻Gut⁻Brain Axis.
Liang, S, Wu, X, Hu, X, Wang, T, Jin, F
International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Emerging research indicates that major depression is not just a mental disorder but also a systemic disease. In depression, the brain-gut axis, the bidirectional pathway that connects the brain and gut, is thought to be disturbed. This disruption is hypothesised to be a major pathological basis of depression. The aim of this paper is to explore this hypothesis by reviewing the current literature. According to the current literature, the authors found research stating the gut microbiota of depressed patients is significantly different from that of healthy controls. Additionally, disturbances or abnormalities in the gut can influence the susceptibility of onset of depression, while restoration of the gut will alleviate depression. Based on these findings, the authors conclude depression is closely related with the condition of the brain-gut axis, and that restoring the normal condition of gut microbiota may aid in the therapy of depression. The authors expect therapies that target gut microbiota will play an important role in the treatment and prevention of depression in the future.
Abstract
Major depression is one of the leading causes of disability, morbidity, and mortality worldwide. The brain⁻gut axis functions are disturbed, revealed by a dysfunction of the brain, immune system, endocrine system, and gut. Traditional depression treatments all target the brain, with different drugs and/or psychotherapy. Unfortunately, most of the patients have never received any treatment. Studies indicate that gut microbiota could be a direct cause for the disorder. Abnormal microbiota and the microbiota⁻gut⁻brain dysfunction may cause mental disorders, while correcting these disturbance could alleviate depression. Nowadays, the gut microbiota modulation has become a hot topic in treatment research of mental disorders. Depression is closely related with the health condition of the brain⁻gut axis, and maintaining/restoring the normal condition of gut microbiota helps in the prevention/therapy of mental disorders.
-
4.
Zinc, Magnesium, Selenium and Depression: A Review of the Evidence, Potential Mechanisms and Implications.
Wang, J, Um, P, Dickerman, BA, Liu, J
Nutrients. 2018;10(5)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Adequate micronutrient consumption and mental health are of major public health importance. Recent findings suggest micronutrient deficiencies may play a role in the development and progression of depression, yet the findings remain unclear. The aim of this review is to present the recent evidence on the association between several micronutrients and depression and discuss the potential mechanisms and clinical implications. Based on the current literature, evidence shows an association between both zinc and magnesium deficiency and the risk of depression, with stronger evidence supporting zinc. Studies on selenium are limited or inconclusive. According to these findings, the authors support the importance of adequate micronutrient consumption for promoting mental health. They suggest future research should investigate the safety and efficacy of micronutrient supplementation as an adjunct treatment for depression to better inform current prevention and treatment strategies.
Abstract
Micronutrient deficiency and depression are major global health problems. Here, we first review recent empirical evidence of the association between several micronutrients—zinc, magnesium, selenium—and depression. We then present potential mechanisms of action and discuss the clinical implications for each micronutrient. Collectively, empirical evidence most strongly supports a positive association between zinc deficiency and the risk of depression and an inverse association between zinc supplementation and depressive symptoms. Less evidence is available regarding the relationship between magnesium and selenium deficiency and depression, and studies have been inconclusive. Potential mechanisms of action involve the HPA axis, glutamate homeostasis and inflammatory pathways. Findings support the importance of adequate consumption of micronutrients in the promotion of mental health, and the most common dietary sources for zinc and other micronutrients are provided. Future research is needed to prospectively investigate the association between micronutrient levels and depression as well as the safety and efficacy of micronutrient supplementation as an adjunct treatment for depression.
-
5.
Metabolic and Microbiota Measures as Peripheral Biomarkers in Major Depressive Disorder.
Horne, R, Foster, JA
Frontiers in psychiatry. 2018;9:513
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Though the connection between the gut microbiome, physical health and mental health is becoming more established, there remains a lack of understanding around the underlying cause of major depressive disorder (MDD). There is a need to identify biomarkers in MDD in order to help identify individual differences and improve treatment outcomes. The aim of this review is to investigate the link between metabolic biomarkers and the gut microbiota in individuals experiencing MDD. The current literature points to two potential biomarkers, leptin and ghrelin, which play a role in both metabolic disease and depression. Based on these findings, the authors conclude these biomarkers may help researchers and clinicians establish subgroups in depressed individuals in order to better predict treatment responses and develop more targeted therapies.
Abstract
Advances in understanding the role of the microbiome in physical and mental health are at the forefront of medical research and hold potential to have a direct impact on precision medicine approaches. In the past 7 years, we have studied the role of microbiota-brain communication on behavior in mouse models using germ-free mice, mice exposed to antibiotics, and healthy specific pathogen free mice. Through our work and that of others, we have seen an amazing increase in our knowledge of how bacteria signal to the brain and the implications this has for psychiatry. Gut microbiota composition and function are influenced both by genetics, age, sex, diet, life experiences, and many other factors of psychiatric and bodily disorders and thus may act as potential biomarkers of the gut-brain axis that could be used in psychiatry and co-morbid conditions. There is a particular need in major depressive disorder and other mental illness to identify biomarkers that can stratify patients into more homogeneous groups to provide better treatment and for development of new therapeutic approaches. Peripheral outcome measures of host-microbe bidirectional communication have significant translational value as biomarkers. Enabling stratification of clinical populations, based on individual biological differences, to predict treatment response to pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Here we consider the links between co-morbid metabolic syndrome and depression, focusing on biomarkers including leptin and ghrelin in combination with assessing gut microbiota composition, as a potential tool to help identify individual differences in depressed population.
-
6.
Commissioning guidance for weight assessment and management in adults and children with severe complex obesity.
Welbourn, R, Hopkins, J, Dixon, JB, Finer, N, Hughes, C, Viner, R, Wass, J
Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2018;19(1):14-27
-
-
-
Plain language summary
Treating severe and complex obesity requires specialist multi-professional teams for assessment, management and optimizing patients’ health outcomes. The aim of this study was to review existing evidence for defining commissioning and delivery of primary or secondary care weight assessment and management clinics to patients needing specialist care for severe and complex obesity. Twenty-two UK royal colleges and professional organizations were invited to develop the guidance revision according to the NICE-accreditation process. Fifty references were included in the final report. The following additions have been identified as new emergent developments to be included in the guidance: - multi-disciplinary team pathways for children/adolescent patients and their transition to adult care, and - anaesthetic assessment and recommendations for ongoing shared care with general practitioners, as a chronic disease management pathway. Authors indicate that the Guidance Development Group recommends the use of the NICE-accredited commissioning guidance as healthcare services in different countries develop services to manage patients with severe and complex obesity.
Abstract
The challenge of managing the epidemic of patients with severe and complex obesity disease in secondary care is largely unmet. In England, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence and the National Health Service England have published guidance on the provision of specialist (non-surgical) weight management services. We have undertaken a systematic review of 'what evidence exists for what should happen in/commissioning of: primary or secondary care weight assessment and management clinics in patients needing specialist care for severe and complex obesity?' using an accredited methodology to produce a model for organization of multidisciplinary team clinics that could be developed in every healthcare system, as an update to a previous review. Additions to the previous guidance were multidisciplinary team pathways for children/adolescent patients and their transition to adult care, anaesthetic assessment and recommendations for ongoing shared care with general practitioners, as a chronic disease management pathway.
-
7.
Physical activity, diet and other behavioural interventions for improving cognition and school achievement in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight.
Martin, A, Booth, JN, Laird, Y, Sproule, J, Reilly, JJ, Saunders, DH
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;3:CD009728
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Obesity in children and teenagers is markedly high worldwide and this has been linked to poor performance in school. While physical activity and diet are known to impact cognitive function, studies have not considered to what extent healthy lifestyle interventions can improve school performance in this cohort. The aim of this systematic review was to explore whether these interventions can improve school performance in children and teenagers with obesity. Based on the current literature, increased nutrition education and improved food offered within schools can lead to moderate improvements in school achievement when compared with standard school practice in children with obesity. The authors conclude that more high quality, school subject-specific research is needed to shed light on the extent of these benefits.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global prevalence of childhood and adolescent obesity is high. Lifestyle changes towards a healthy diet, increased physical activity and reduced sedentary activities are recommended to prevent and treat obesity. Evidence suggests that changing these health behaviours can benefit cognitive function and school achievement in children and adolescents in general. There are various theoretical mechanisms that suggest that children and adolescents with excessive body fat may benefit particularly from these interventions. OBJECTIVES To assess whether lifestyle interventions (in the areas of diet, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and behavioural therapy) improve school achievement, cognitive function (e.g. executive functions) and/or future success in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight, compared with standard care, waiting-list control, no treatment, or an attention placebo control group. SEARCH METHODS In February 2017, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and 15 other databases. We also searched two trials registries, reference lists, and handsearched one journal from inception. We also contacted researchers in the field to obtain unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of behavioural interventions for weight management in children and adolescents with obesity or overweight. We excluded studies in children and adolescents with medical conditions known to affect weight status, school achievement and cognitive function. We also excluded self- and parent-reported outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Four review authors independently selected studies for inclusion. Two review authors extracted data, assessed quality and risks of bias, and evaluated the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. We contacted study authors to obtain additional information. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Where the same outcome was assessed across different intervention types, we reported standardised effect sizes for findings from single-study and multiple-study analyses to allow comparison of intervention effects across intervention types. To ease interpretation of the effect size, we also reported the mean difference of effect sizes for single-study outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We included 18 studies (59 records) of 2384 children and adolescents with obesity or overweight. Eight studies delivered physical activity interventions, seven studies combined physical activity programmes with healthy lifestyle education, and three studies delivered dietary interventions. We included five RCTs and 13 cluster-RCTs. The studies took place in 10 different countries. Two were carried out in children attending preschool, 11 were conducted in primary/elementary school-aged children, four studies were aimed at adolescents attending secondary/high school and one study included primary/elementary and secondary/high school-aged children. The number of studies included for each outcome was low, with up to only three studies per outcome. The quality of evidence ranged from high to very low and 17 studies had a high risk of bias for at least one item. None of the studies reported data on additional educational support needs and adverse events.Compared to standard practice, analyses of physical activity-only interventions suggested high-quality evidence for improved mean cognitive executive function scores. The mean difference (MD) was 5.00 scale points higher in an after-school exercise group compared to standard practice (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 9.32; scale mean 100, standard deviation 15; 116 children, 1 study). There was no statistically significant beneficial effect in favour of the intervention for mathematics, reading, or inhibition control. The standardised mean difference (SMD) for mathematics was 0.49 (95% CI -0.04 to 1.01; 2 studies, 255 children, moderate-quality evidence) and for reading was 0.10 (95% CI -0.30 to 0.49; 2 studies, 308 children, moderate-quality evidence). The MD for inhibition control was -1.55 scale points (95% CI -5.85 to 2.75; scale range 0 to 100; SMD -0.15, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.28; 1 study, 84 children, very low-quality evidence). No data were available for average achievement across subjects taught at school.There was no evidence of a beneficial effect of physical activity interventions combined with healthy lifestyle education on average achievement across subjects taught at school, mathematics achievement, reading achievement or inhibition control. The MD for average achievement across subjects taught at school was 6.37 points lower in the intervention group compared to standard practice (95% CI -36.83 to 24.09; scale mean 500, scale SD 70; SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.93 to 0.58; 1 study, 31 children, low-quality evidence). The effect estimate for mathematics achievement was SMD 0.02 (95% CI -0.19 to 0.22; 3 studies, 384 children, very low-quality evidence), for reading achievement SMD 0.00 (95% CI -0.24 to 0.24; 2 studies, 284 children, low-quality evidence), and for inhibition control SMD -0.67 (95% CI -1.50 to 0.16; 2 studies, 110 children, very low-quality evidence). No data were available for the effect of combined physical activity and healthy lifestyle education on cognitive executive functions.There was a moderate difference in the average achievement across subjects taught at school favouring interventions targeting the improvement of the school food environment compared to standard practice in adolescents with obesity (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.66; 2 studies, 382 adolescents, low-quality evidence), but not with overweight. Replacing packed school lunch with a nutrient-rich diet in addition to nutrition education did not improve mathematics (MD -2.18, 95% CI -5.83 to 1.47; scale range 0 to 69; SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.72 to 0.20; 1 study, 76 children, low-quality evidence) and reading achievement (MD 1.17, 95% CI -4.40 to 6.73; scale range 0 to 108; SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.61; 1 study, 67 children, low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Despite the large number of childhood and adolescent obesity treatment trials, we were only able to partially assess the impact of obesity treatment interventions on school achievement and cognitive abilities. School and community-based physical activity interventions as part of an obesity prevention or treatment programme can benefit executive functions of children with obesity or overweight specifically. Similarly, school-based dietary interventions may benefit general school achievement in children with obesity. These findings might assist health and education practitioners to make decisions related to promoting physical activity and healthy eating in schools. Future obesity treatment and prevention studies in clinical, school and community settings should consider assessing academic and cognitive as well as physical outcomes.
-
8.
Microbiome-Gut-Brain Axis and Toll-Like Receptors in Parkinson's Disease.
Caputi, V, Giron, MC
International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(6)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressively debilitating neurodegenerative disease and recently the role of the microbiota-gut-brain axis has gained attention in patients with PD. Research shows that an altered gut microbiota can activate Toll-like receptors (TLRs), receptors involved in the innate immune response, causing an inflammatory cascade in the gut and brain. Based on this knowledge, gut microbiota and TLRs may be potential therapeutic targets for PD. This review sheds light on the current knowledge regarding the association between the microbiota-gut-brain axis and innate immunity via TLR signalling in PD. Increased understanding of this relationship should lead to insights on the pathophysiology of PD, as well as improved dietary and pharmaceutical therapeutic approaches in PD patients. Based on the existing evidence, the authors conclude that through modulating the gut, thus balancing the immune response in PD patients, it may be possible to influence early phases of the neurodegenerative cascade.
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressively debilitating neurodegenerative disease characterized by α-synucleinopathy, which involves all districts of the brain-gut axis, including the central, autonomic and enteric nervous systems. The highly bidirectional communication between the brain and the gut is markedly influenced by the microbiome through integrated immunological, neuroendocrine and neurological processes. The gut microbiota and its relevant metabolites interact with the host via a series of biochemical and functional inputs, thereby affecting host homeostasis and health. Indeed, a dysregulated microbiota-gut-brain axis in PD might lie at the basis of gastrointestinal dysfunctions which predominantly emerge many years prior to the diagnosis, corroborating the theory that the pathological process is spread from the gut to the brain. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a crucial role in innate immunity by recognizing conserved motifs primarily found in microorganisms and a dysregulation in their signaling may be implicated in α-synucleinopathy, such as PD. An overstimulation of the innate immune system due to gut dysbiosis and/or small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, together with higher intestinal barrier permeability, may provoke local and systemic inflammation as well as enteric neuroglial activation, ultimately triggering the development of alpha-synuclein pathology. In this review, we provide the current knowledge regarding the relationship between the microbiota-gut⁻brain axis and TLRs in PD. A better understanding of the dialogue sustained by the microbiota-gut-brain axis and innate immunity via TLR signaling should bring interesting insights in the pathophysiology of PD and provide novel dietary and/or therapeutic measures aimed at shaping the gut microbiota composition, improving the intestinal epithelial barrier function and balancing the innate immune response in PD patients, in order to influence the early phases of the following neurodegenerative cascade.
-
9.
A systematic review of attentional biases in disorders involving binge eating.
Stojek, M, Shank, LM, Vannucci, A, Bongiorno, DM, Nelson, EE, Waters, AJ, Engel, SG, Boutelle, KN, Pine, DS, Yanovski, JA, et al
Appetite. 2018;123:367-389
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Binge eating behaviour is a feature of certain eating disorders (such as binge eating disorder (BED), bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-purge subtype of anorexia nervosa (AN). It can also be a problem for those who do not meet the criteria for an eating disorder diagnosis. The presence of binging, and a loss of control is a risk for eating disorder development, psychological distress and/or excess body weight. It is important to explore the factors that may cause or maintain binge eating behaviour. Attentional bias (AB; paying attention to some things and ignoring others) is thought to contribute to the development of eating disorders when it is maladaptive. This systematic review of 50 cross-sectional designed articles explores findings on AB to food cues, weight and shape cues and threatening cues. The review found that people with binge eating behaviour may be oversensitive to the rewarding properties of food and have increased AB for weight/shape cues, suggesting it needs to be considered when supporting people who binge. Longitudinal research is needed to explore if AB is a factor in the development of eating disorders and binge eating.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Attentional bias (AB) may be one mechanism contributing to the development and/or maintenance of disordered eating. AB has traditionally been measured using reaction time in response to a stimulus. Novel methods for AB measurement include eye tracking to measure visual fixation on a stimulus, and electroencephalography to measure brain activation in response to a stimulus. This systematic review summarizes, critiques, and integrates data on AB gathered using the above-mentioned methods in those with binge eating behaviors, including binge eating, loss of control eating, and bulimia nervosa. METHOD Literature searches on PubMed and PsycInfo were conducted using combinations of terms related to binge eating and biobehavioral AB paradigms. Studies using AB paradigms with three categories of stimuli were included: food, weight/shape, and threat. For studies reporting means and standard deviations of group bias scores, Hedges' g effect sizes for group differences in AB were calculated. RESULTS Fifty articles met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Individuals who binge eat in the absence of compensatory behaviors show an increased AB to food cues, but few studies have examined such individuals' AB toward weight/shape and threatening stimuli. Individuals with bulimia nervosa consistently show an increased AB to shape/weight cues and socially threatening stimuli, but findings for AB to food cues are mixed. DISCUSSION While there are important research gaps, preliminary evidence suggests that the combination of AB to disorder-specific cues (i.e., food and weight/shape) and AB toward threat may be a potent contributor to binge eating. This conclusion underscores previous findings on the interaction between negative affect and AB to disorder-specific cues. Recommendations for future research are provided.
-
10.
Harnessing the Power of Microbiome Assessment Tools as Part of Neuroprotective Nutrition and Lifestyle Medicine Interventions.
Toribio-Mateas, M
Microorganisms. 2018;6(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This is a practical review written by a clinician for other clinicians. It draws from an extensive body of evidence on the links between the gut microbes (bacteria amongst them), called the microbiota, both in health and in a variety of human diseases. The author, who is also a researcher in the communication between the gut and the brain (the gut-brain axis), focuses on the translation of science into simple clinical applications that result in measurable health outcomes, and in particular in neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, but also other less well studied such as Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). The paper also covers mental health / mood conditions such as anxiety, and depression. Practitioners who work in the area of gut health and use stool tests to assess various imbalances their patients may be experiencing will get the most out this paper. The author takes a look at the physiological processes that influence gastrointestinal as well as brain health and discusses how tools such as the characterisation or "mapping" of commensal bacteria (the bacteria that lives inside our guts normally), along with the identification of potential opportunistic and pathogenic bacteria and parasites, together with knowledge of molecules such as short chain fatty acids or zonulin can enable better clinical decision making by nutrition and lifestyle medicine practitioners. The paper also includes a valuable discussion on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and particularly on the use of MYMOP by practitioners as a validated tool to collect insight from exposure to real world data in clinical practice.
Abstract
An extensive body of evidence documents the importance of the gut microbiome both in health and in a variety of human diseases. Cell and animal studies describing this relationship abound, whilst clinical studies exploring the associations between changes in gut microbiota and the corresponding metabolites with neurodegeneration in the human brain have only begun to emerge more recently. Further, the findings of such studies are often difficult to translate into simple clinical applications that result in measurable health outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to appraise the literature on a select set of faecal biomarkers from a clinician’s perspective. This practical review aims to examine key physiological processes that influence both gastrointestinal, as well as brain health, and to discuss how tools such as the characterisation of commensal bacteria, the identification of potential opportunistic, pathogenic and parasitic organisms and the quantification of gut microbiome biomarkers and metabolites can help inform clinical decisions of nutrition and lifestyle medicine practitioners.