-
1.
Comparison of Aspirin and Naoxintong Capsule () with Adjusted-Dose Warfarin in Elderly Patients with High-Risk of Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation and Genetic Variants of Vitamin K Epoxide Reductase.
Wang, H, Zhou, XK, Zheng, LF, Wu, XY, Chen, H
Chinese journal of integrative medicine. 2018;(4):247-253
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compared the therapeutic effect of a Chinese patent medicine Naoxintong Capsule (, NXT) and aspirin with adjusted-dose warfarin in Chinese elderly patients (over 65 years) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and genetic variants of vitamin K epoxide reductase (VKORC1), who are at high-risk of thromboembolism. METHODS A total of 151 patients, with NVAF and AA genotype of VKORC1-1639 (a sensitive genotype to warfarin) and a CHA2DS2-VASc clinical risk score of 2 or above, were chosen for this study. Patients were randomized into two groups and orally treated with a combination of aspirin (100 mg/day) and NXT (1.6 g thrice a day) or adjusted-dose warfarin [international normalized ratio 2.0-3.0). The primary end points including ischemic stroke and death as well as the secondary end points including hemorrhage events were followed up for at least 1 year. RESULTS Baseline clinical data and the rates of primary end points were similar between groups. However, the rate of serious bleeding (secondary event) in the combination therapy group was lower than that in the adjusted-dose warfarin group (0% vs. 7.9%, odds ratio: 0.921, 95% confidence interval: 0.862-0.984, P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS Aspirin combined with NXT and warfarin displayed comparable rates of primary end point including ischemic stroke and all-cause death during the 1-year follow-up. However, as compared with warfarin, the combination therapy reduced the rate of serious bleeding. Therefore, aspirin combined with NXT might provide an alternative pharmacotherapy in preventing ischemic stroke for elderly patients with NAVF who cannot tolerate warfarin. (No. ChiCTR-TRC-13003596).
-
2.
Impact of provision of time in therapeutic range value on anticoagulation management in atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin.
Huang, D, Wong, CL, Cheng, KW, Chan, PH, Yue, WS, Wong, CK, Ho, CW, Wong, ICK, Chan, EW, Siu, CW
Postgraduate medical journal. 2018;(1110):207-211
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The importance of time in therapeutic range (TTR) in patients prescribed warfarin therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be overemphasised. AIM: To evaluate the impact of provision of TTR results during clinic visits on anticoagulation management. DESIGN Single-centred, randomised controlled study. SETTING Fifteen arrhythmia clinics in Hong Kong. PATIENTS AF patients prescribed warfarin. INTERVENTIONS Provision of TTR or no provision of TTR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A documented discussion between doctors and patients about switching warfarin to a non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOAC). RESULTS Four hundred and eighty one patients with AF prescribed warfarin were randomly assigned to (1) a TTR provision group or (2) control. Their mean age was 73.6±12.0 years and 60.7% were men. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2±1.6 and the mean HASBLED score was 1.7±1.2. The mean TTR was 63.9%±29.9%. At the index clinic visit, 71 of 481 patients (14.8%) had a documented discussion about switching warfarin to a NOAC. Patients with provision of TTR results were more likely to discuss switching warfarin to a NOAC than controls (19.1% vs 10.6%, P=0.03), especially those with a TTR <65% (35.2% vs 10.6%, P<0.001). A higher proportion of patients with provision of TTR results switched to a NOAC (5.9% vs 4.1%, P=0.49). CONCLUSIONS The provision of TTR among patients on warfarin was associated with a discussion about switching from warfarin to a NOAC in those with TTR <65%, but did not result in actual switching to a NOAC, suggesting additional barriers.
-
3.
Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction.
Potpara, TS, Ferro, CJ, Lip, GYH
Nature reviews. Nephrology. 2018;(5):337-351
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are increasingly prevalent in the general population and share common risk factors such as older age, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. The presence of CKD increases the risk of incident AF, and, likewise, AF increases the risk of CKD development and/or progression. Both conditions are associated with substantial thromboembolic risk, but patients with advanced CKD also exhibit a paradoxical increase in bleeding risk. In the landmark randomized clinical trials that compared non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin for thromboprophylaxis in patients with AF, the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with mild-to-moderate CKD were similar to those in patients without CKD. Dose adjustment of NOACs as per the prescribing label is required in this population. Owing to limited trial data, evidence-based recommendations for the management of patients with AF and severe CKD or end-stage renal disease on dialysis are lacking. Observational cohort studies have reported conflicting results, and the management of these particularly vulnerable patients remains challenging and requires careful assessment of stroke and bleeding risk and, where appropriate, use of warfarin with good-quality anticoagulation control.
-
4.
Evaluation of the Bleeding Intensity of Patients Anticoagulated with Warfarin or Dabigatran Undergoing Dental Procedures.
Andrade, MVS, Andrade, LAP, Bispo, AF, Freitas, LA, Andrade, MQS, Feitosa, GS, Feitosa-Filho, GS
Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2018;(3):394-399
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thrombotic disorders remain one of the leading causes of death in the Western world. Dabigatran appeared as an alternative to warfarin for anticoagulation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The risk associated with bleeding due to its use has been documented in several randomized clinical trials, but no large study has examined in detail the risk of bleeding during dental extraction and other dental procedures involving bleeding. OBJECTIVE To compare the intensity of bleeding in individuals taking dabigatran or vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) and undergoing dental procedures. METHODS Prospective, single-center, controlled study with one single observer. Patients diagnosed with nonvalvular AF, on warfarin or dabigatran, cared for at a cardiology referral center, and requiring single or multiple dental extractions, were evaluated up to seven days post-extraction. The following outcomes were assessed: bleeding time between the beginning and the end of suture and complete hemostasis; bleeding before the procedure, after 24 hours, 48 hours, 7 days, during and after suture removal (late); p<0.05 was defined as of statistical relevance. RESULTS We evaluated 37 individuals, 25 in the warfarin group and 12 in the dabigatran group. Age, sex, weight, height, blood pressure, color, schooling, family income and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Regarding bleeding after 24 hours of the procedure, no one in the dabigatran group had bleeding, whereas 32% in the warfarin group had documented bleeding (p = 0.028). The other variables analyzed did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that, regarding dental extraction, there is no statistically significant difference in the intensity of bleeding of patients taking dabigatran as compared to those taking warfarin. Bleeding 24 hours after the procedure was less frequent among patients on dabigatran.
-
5.
Patient Satisfaction with Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin.
Okumura, Y, Yokoyama, K, Matsumoto, N, Tachibana, E, Kuronuma, K, Oiwa, K, Matsumoto, M, Kojima, T, Arima, K, Kotani, T, et al
International heart journal. 2018;(6):1266-1274
Abstract
The burden of anticoagulation treatment affects patient satisfaction, which in turn affects adherence to treatment. Thus, we must thoroughly understand the advantages of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)/warfarin given for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared satisfaction with anticoagulation therapy between 654 DOAC and 821 warfarin users enrolled in the SAKURA AF Registry. Satisfaction was assessed by means of the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS), which includes 12-item burdens and 3-item benefits scales, and the treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication II (TSQM II), which includes 2-item effectiveness, 3-item side effects, 3-item convenience, and 2-item global satisfaction domains. There were no significant between-group differences in TSQM II convenience (67.6 ± 14.5 versus 68.9 ± 14.5, P = 0.280), effectiveness (65.0 ± 13.3 versus 66.0 ± 15.0, P = 0.422), side effects (93.6 ± 13.7 versus 92.8 ± 14.4, P = 0.067), and global satisfaction (64.7 ± 14.9 versus 66.0 ± 14.6, P = 0.407) scores. In contrast, although there was no significant between-group difference in the ACTS benefits scores (9.8 ± 3.1 versus 10.1 ± 3.2, P = 0.051), the ACTS burdens scores (54.5 ± 6.3 versus 52.7 ± 6.9, P < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the DOAC users, independent of age, sex, and DOAC type. We can expect greater burden satisfaction with anticoagulation treatment in patients given a DOAC versus VKA/warfarin. The reduced burden of treatment will translate to greater patient adherence to their treatment plans and a positive effect on clinical outcomes.
-
6.
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants have better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim, IS, Kim, HJ, Kim, TH, Uhm, JS, Joung, B, Lee, MH, Pak, HN
Journal of cardiology. 2018;(2):105-112
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with atrial fibrillation (AF), depending on dose and/or renal function. METHODS After systematically searching the databases (Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science), 5 phase III randomized controlled trials and reported data according to subgroups of elderly/non-elderly AF patients, comparing any NOACs and warfarin were included. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were stroke/systemic thromboembolism and major bleeding. RESULTS (1) NOACs showed better efficacy than warfarin in elderly patients [RR 0.83 (0.69-1.00), p=0.04, I2=55%], but equivalent efficacy in non-elderly patients. (2) NOACs reduced major bleeding compared to warfarin in non-elderly (p<0.001) and had comparable safety to warfarin in elderly patients. (3) Even in elderly patients with moderately impaired renal function, NOACs had a safety profile comparable to that of warfarin for major bleeding if dose reduction was reached appropriately [pooled RR 0.82 (0.35-1.88), p=0.63, I2=63%]. (4) All-cause mortality was lower with NOACs in non-elderly patients [RR 0.89 (0.83-0.95), p=0.001, I2=0%], and with standard-dose NOAC group of elderly patients [RR 0.93 (0.86-1.00), p=0.04, I2=0%] compared to warfarin. CONCLUSIONS For elderly patients (aged ≥75 years), NOACs showed better efficacy and equivalent safety compared to warfarin even in those with moderately impaired renal function. All-cause mortality was lower with standard-dose NOACs compared to warfarin in the elderly patient group. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO under CRD42016047922 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42016047922).
-
7.
The critical interaction between valproate sodium and warfarin: case report and review.
Zhou, C, Sui, Y, Zhao, W, Dong, C, Ren, L, Song, P, Xu, B, Sun, X
BMC pharmacology & toxicology. 2018;(1):60
Abstract
BACKGROUND Valproic acid (VPA) and warfarin are commonly prescribed for patients with epilepsy and concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF). When VPA and warfarin are prescribed together, clinically important interactions may occur. VPA may replace warfarin from the protein binding sites and result in an abnormally increased anticoagulation effect. This is commonly underrecognized. CASE PRESENTATION In our case, we report a 78-year-old woman with a glioma who presented with status epilepticus. The patient was on warfarin to prevent cardiogenic embolism secondary to AF. Intravenous loading dose of VPA was administered, but international normalized ratio (INR) increased significantly to 8.26. Intravenous vitamin K1 was then given and the patient developed no overt bleeding during the hospitalization. CONCLUSION By reviewing the literature and discussing the critical interaction between valproate sodium and warfarin, we conclude that intravenous VPA and the co-administrated warfarin may develop critical but underrecognized complications due to effects on the function of hepatic enzymes and displacement of protein binding sites.
-
8.
Randomized trial of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the evaluation of progression of coronary atherosclerosis.
Lee, J, Nakanishi, R, Li, D, Shaikh, K, Shekar, C, Osawa, K, Nezarat, N, Jayawardena, E, Blanco, M, Chen, M, et al
American heart journal. 2018;:127-130
Abstract
Warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, is associated with systemic vascular calcification. We evaluated whether rivaroxaban (a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor with no interaction with vitamin K) will slow the progression in coronary plaque volumes compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using coronary computed tomography angiography.
-
9.
A simple, sensitive, and high-throughput LC-APCI-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of vitamin K1, vitamin K1 2,3-epoxide in human plasma and its application to a clinical pharmacodynamic study of warfarin.
Hu, K, Li, Y, Ding, R, Zhai, Y, Chen, L, Qian, W, Yang, J
Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis. 2018;:82-91
Abstract
Warfarin exerts its anticoagulation activity by blocking the vitamin K-epoxide cycle. A quantitative understanding of how warfarin and related genes interact with the vitamin K-epoxide cycle and the associated change of coagulation activity in the human body may help study the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. The plasma concentration of vitamin K1 (VK1) and vitamin K1 2,3-epoxide (VK1O) could reflect the status of vitamin K-epoxide cycle. However, their determination is a challenging task due to their extremely low concentrations in human plasma and the severe interferences caused by co-extracted lipids. In this study, we developed an LC-APCI-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of VK1 and VK1O in human plasma using stable deuterium-labeled vitamin K1 (vitamin K1-d7) as the internal standard (IS). Plasma samples were prepared through protein denaturation followed by one-step liquid extraction with cyclohexane. Chromatographic separation of analytes from isobaric interferences and endogenous ion suppressor was performed on a Synergi Hydro-RP column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 4 μm) under the reversed-phase condition with isocratic elution. The selective reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions were chosen as m/z = 451.5→187.3 for VK1, m/z = 467.5→161.2 for VK1O, and m/z = 458.6→194.3 for IS in APCI positive mode. The assay was linear in the range of 100-10,000 pg/mL for the two analytes and achieved considerable extraction recoveries (87.8-93.3%, 91.0-96.9%, and 92.0% for VK1, VK1O, and IS, respectively), negligible matrix effects (93.6-96.0%, 96.3-100.1%, and 95.5%), and high selectivity with a small sample volume requirement (0.2 mL) and short run time (15 min). The validated method was successfully applied in a clinical pharmacodynamic study of warfarin, and the clotting activity was found to be negatively correlated with the plasma concentration ratio of VK1O to VK1.
-
10.
Management of Perioperative Anticoagulation for Device Implantation.
Stewart, MH, Morin, DP
Cardiac electrophysiology clinics. 2018;(1):99-109
Abstract
Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for cardiac device implantation has evolved over the past 20 years. The traditional paradigm of vitamin K antagonist interruption with heparin bridging has now been shown to be less safe than continuation of vitamin K antagonists at therapeutic levels. Dual antiplatelet therapy during device implantation poses substantial risk but is often necessary. The safest dosing strategy for newer direct oral anticoagulants is still not clear.