-
1.
The sorafenib anti-relapse effect after alloHSCT is associated with heightened alloreactivity and accumulation of CD8+PD-1+ (CD279+) lymphocytes in marrow.
Lange, A, Jaskula, E, Lange, J, Dworacki, G, Nowak, D, Simiczyjew, A, Mordak-Domagala, M, Sedzimirska, M
PloS one. 2018;(1):e0190525
Abstract
We studied three FLT3 ITD acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who relapsed after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and received multikinase inhibitor (MKI) sorafenib as part of salvage therapy. MKI was given to block the effect of FLT3 ITD mutation which powers proliferation of blast cells. However, the known facts that sorafenib is more effective in patents post alloHSCT suggested that this MKI can augment the immune system surveillance on leukaemia. In the present study, we investigated in depth the effect of sorafenib on the alloreactivity seen post-transplant including that on leukaemia. The patients (i) responded to the treatment with cessation of blasts which lasted 1, 17 and 42+ months, (ii) developed skin lesions with CD3+ cell invasion of the epidermis, (iii) had marrow infiltrated with CD8+ lymphocytes which co-expressed PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1 receptor, CD279) in higher proportions than those in the blood (163±32 x103 cells/μl vs 38±8 x103 cells/μl, p<0.001). The Lymphoprep fraction of marrow cells investigated for the expression of genes involved in lymphocyte activation showed in the patients with long lasting complete remission (CR) a similar pattern characterized by (i) a low expression of nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) and colony stimulating factor 2 (CSF2) as well as that of angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4) (supporting the immune response and anti-angiogenic) genes, and (ii) higher expression of fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) and collagen type IV alpha 3 chain (COL4A3) as well as toll like receptor 9 (TLR9) and interleukin-12 (IL-12) (pro-inflammatory expression profile) genes as compared with the normal individual. The positive effect in one patient hardly justified the presence of unwanted effects (progressive chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) and avascular necrosis of the femur), which were in contrast negligible in the other patient. The anti-leukemic and unwanted effects of sorafenib do not rely on each other.
-
2.
Factors involved in early lenvatinib dose reduction: a retrospective analysis.
Suyama, K, Tomiguchi, M, Takeshita, T, Sueta, A, Yamamoto-Ibusuki, M, Shimokawa, M, Yamamoto, Y, Iwase, H
Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England). 2018;(3):19
Abstract
Lenvatinib, a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been proven to be an effective treatment option for patients with iodine-131-refractory thyroid cancer. Many adverse effects of lenvatinib have been reported; thus, dose reduction is common. However, a few studies have analyzed the causes of lenvatinib dose reduction in daily clinical practice. Here, we investigate the factors involved in early lenvatinib dose reduction to analyze lenvatinib dose modification. We analyzed 20 thyroid cancer patients who began receiving lenvatinib at the Kumamoto University Hospital Cancer Center from July 2015 to November 2016. Patients were classified into the following groups based on the time until first withdrawal or dose reduction in lenvatinib: group A (early, ≤ 10 days) and group B (other, > 10 days). Patients' clinical features and reasons for withdrawal or dose reduction were analyzed. The age range of patients was 54-91 years, and the median observation period was 293 days. There were no significant differences in the administered line of lenvatinib; the presence/absence of primary residual tumors; or the history of hypertension, proteinuria, and diarrhea between the two groups (A, n = 7; B, n = 13). The cause for initial withdrawal or dose reduction was grade 3 hypertension in all group A patients, which was significantly higher than that in group B (p = 0.0001). Our results suggest that early blood pressure control may be effective as a method to maintain the lenvatinib dose intensity.
-
3.
Early prediction of lenvatinib treatment efficacy by using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with unresectable or advanced thyroid carcinoma that is refractory to radioiodine treatment: a protocol for a non-randomized single-arm multicenter observational study.
Takeuchi, S, Shiga, T, Hirata, K, Taguchi, J, Magota, K, Ariga, S, Gouda, T, Ohhara, Y, Homma, R, Shimizu, Y, et al
BMJ open. 2018;(8):e021001
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lenvatinib, an oral molecular targeted drug, is used to treat patients with unresectable or advanced thyroid carcinoma that is refractory to radioiodine treatment. Effective methods for evaluating molecular targeted drugs are a critical unmet need owing to their expensive costs and unique adverse events. The aim of this study is to determine whether 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT at 1 week after commencing lenvatinib can predict treatment outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS This study is planned as a non-randomised single-arm multicentre study; patients with pathologically confirmed differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) with lesions that are refractory to radioiodine treatment are eligible. The main exclusion criteria are medullary or anaplastic carcinoma, prior treatment with chemotherapy, poor general condition and thromboembolism-requiring treatment. Patients to be included in the study will be treated with lenvatinib and undergo FDG-PET/CT examination twice: before and 1 week after the initiation of treatment. Contrast-enhanced CT, the gold standard for evaluation, will be performed at least 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. The primary objective is to evaluate the ability of the lesion maximum standard uptake value for FDG PET/CT performed 1 week after the initiation of treatment to predict outcomes compared with the response evaluation obtained via contrast-enhanced CT performed at least 4 weeks after the initiation of treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has received ethical approval from the institutional review board of the Hokkaido University Hospital (approval number: 015-402). The results of this study will be disseminated through a presentation at a conference and the publication of the data in a peer-reviewed journal. The study will be implemented and reported in line with the SPIRIT statement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER UMIN000022592.
-
4.
Optimisation of treatment with lenvatinib in radioactive iodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.
Capdevila, J, Newbold, K, Licitra, L, Popovtzer, A, Moreso, F, Zamorano, J, Kreissl, M, Aller, J, Grande, E
Cancer treatment reviews. 2018;:164-176
Abstract
Lenvatinib has been approved for the treatment of advanced differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) refractory to radioactive iodine (RAI) following the results of the SELECT trial which demonstrated a significant increase in progression-free survival and a high response rates. The data reported for lenvatinib in RAI-refractory DTC (RAI-R DTC) are the most significant to date in this patient population, with a RECIST objective response rate above 60% and almost 80% reduction in the risk of disease progression. Because the first indication in oncology for lenvatinib is specifically in RAI-R DTC, a period of familiarisation with its safety and efficacy profile is required. This review includes a series of specific recommendations for optimising the management of RAI-R DTC with lenvatinib, as well as specific guidelines for minimising the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), which enable dose intensity to be increased and this way maximise the benefits of the drug in the patient population treated. These recommendations were defined at a meeting of experts of different specialities, reviewing available scientific evidence on the drug, as well as their own direct personal experience in daily clinical practice. For toxicity to be properly managed, a multidisciplinary approach is required in which the different medical services, nursing staff and the patient and their careers are all involved. It is essential to assess the suitability of patients who are candidates for lenvatinib, as well as their clinical and physiological status prior to treatment. They must then be closely monitored to prevent and detect possible AEs. The main objective should be to maintain the dose that obtains the maximum therapeutic effect, discontinuing the treatment only if the toxicity becomes unmanageable or there is no clinical benefit.
-
5.
Impact of baseline characteristics on outcomes of advanced HCC patients treated with sorafenib: a secondary analysis of a phase III study.
Abdel-Rahman, O
Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2018;(5):901-908
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study aims to investigate the impact of baseline characteristics on the outcomes of sorafenib-treated advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in the setting of a clinical trial. METHODS This is a secondary analysis of the comparator arm (sorafenib arm) of the NCT00699374 study which is a phase III multicenter study conducted between 2008 and 2010. The univariate probability of overall and progression-free survival was assessed among different patient subsets through Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting overall and progression-free survival was then conducted through Cox regression analysis. RESULTS All patients within the comparator (sorafenib) arm were included in the analysis (N = 544 patients). In multivariate analysis, prior hepatectomy (P = 0.028), prior locoregional treatment (P = 0.048), grade 1 ALBI score (P < 0.001), ECOG performance score of 0 (P < 0.001), BMI ≥ 25 (P = 0.026), AFP < 200 (P = 0.001), and no extra-hepatic spread (P = 0.007) were associated with better overall survival. Likewise, in multivariate analysis, non-Asian race (P = 0.004), grade 1 ALBI score (P = 0.001), ECOG performance score of 0 (P = 0.006), and no extra-hepatic spread (P = 0.005) were associated with better progression-free survival. Moreover, development of high-grade hand-foot skin reaction was associated with a statistically significant improvement in overall survival (P = 0.003), which was further confirmed in a multivariate analysis adjusted for other relevant baseline factors (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION Within a cohort of highly selected advanced HCC patients, baseline patient-, liver-, and disease-centered variables play an important role in predicting patient outcomes. This information is important in terms of therapeutic decision-making and patient counseling.
-
6.
Hand-foot skin reaction is a beneficial indicator of sorafenib therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Wang, P, Tan, G, Zhu, M, Li, W, Zhai, B, Sun, X
Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2018;(1):1-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sorafenib remains the only standard first-line drug for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a very common side-effect in patients treated with sorafenib, and also affects the treatment schedule and quality of life. However, the association of HFSR and response of HCC to sorafenib remain unclear. METHODS Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to May 7th, 2017. Review Manager 5.3 software was adopted for performing meta-analyses, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for assessing the bias of cohort studies, and GRADEprofler software for further assessing outcomes obtained from meta-analyses. RESULTS 1478 articles were reviewed, and 12 cohort studies with 1017 participants were included in the analyses. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival is 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36, 0.55; P < 0.00001; I2 = 35%). The pooled HR of time to progression is 0.41 (95% CI 0.28, 0.60; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). Patients suffering HFSR had significantly better outcomes from sorafenib therapy than those without HFSR. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that HFSR is a beneficial indicator for HCC patients receiving sorafenib therapy. However, molecular mechanisms accounting for sorafenib-induced HFSR in HCC patients remain.
-
7.
Regorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Tovoli, F, Granito, A, De Lorenzo, S, Bolondi, L
Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2018;(1):5-13
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a worldwide problem, with a high prevalence in nonindustrialized countries and a rising incidence in industrialized countries as well. Its close association with chronic liver diseases and liver cirrhosis represents a significant challenge in its treatment. A front-line systemic treatment for unresectable cases of HCC (sorafenib) was identified only in 2007. Following a decade of failed clinical trials with a wide range of drugs for second-line treatment, regorafenib proved its efficacy as a second-line treatment in 2016, when the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III RESORCE trial demonstrated a meaningful increase in overall survival in the regorafenib treatment arm compared with the placebo arm (10.6 vs. 7.8 months). In this monograph we review the main preclinical and clinical findings in the trials assessing regorafenib for the treatment of HCC patients.
-
8.
Efficacy of tivozanib treatment after sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: crossover of a phase 3 study.
Molina, AM, Hutson, TE, Nosov, D, Tomczak, P, Lipatov, O, Sternberg, CN, Motzer, R, Eisen, T
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990). 2018;:87-94
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tivozanib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2 and 3 tyrosine kinases. This open-label, crossover clinical study (AV-951-09-902) provided access to tivozanib for patients who progressed on sorafenib in TIVO-1, comparing tivozanib with sorafenib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS Patients enrolled in this single-arm, phase 2 crossover study were previously randomised to sorafenib on TIVO-1, progressed and then crossed over to tivozanib. Patients received tivozanib (1.5 mg/day orally; 3 weeks on/1 week off) within 4 weeks after their last sorafenib dose. FINDINGS Crossover patients were exposed to tivozanib for a median of eight cycles. From the start of tivozanib treatment, median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-12.7) and median overall survival was 21.6 months (95% CI: 17.0-27.6). Best overall response was partial response in 29 (18%) patients and stable disease in 83 (52%) patients, with a median duration of response of 15.2 and 12.7 months, respectively. About 77% of patients experienced adverse events, most frequently hypertension (26%), followed by diarrhoea (14%) and fatigue (13%); 53% of patients had treatment-related adverse events, including 24% grade ≥3. About 9% and 16% of patients had dose reductions and dose interruptions due to adverse events, respectively. A total of 30% of patients had serious adverse events, and 4% had treatment-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION This crossover study of patients with advanced RCC demonstrated potent tivozanib anti-tumour activity. Safety and tolerability profiles were acceptable and consistent with the established adverse event profile of tivozanib.
-
9.
Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial.
Kudo, M, Finn, RS, Qin, S, Han, KH, Ikeda, K, Piscaglia, F, Baron, A, Park, JW, Han, G, Jassem, J, et al
Lancet (London, England). 2018;(10126):1163-1173
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND In a phase 2 trial, lenvatinib, an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients treated with lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS This was an open-label, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial that recruited patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, who had not received treatment for advanced disease, at 154 sites in 20 countries throughout the Asia-Pacific, European, and North American regions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system-with region; macroscopic portal vein invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; and bodyweight as stratification factors-to receive oral lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg) or sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause. The efficacy analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, and only patients who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. The non-inferiority margin was set at 1·08. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01761266. FINDINGS Between March 1, 2013 and July 30, 2015, 1492 patients were recruited. 954 eligible patients were randomly assigned to lenvatinib (n=478) or sorafenib (n=476). Median survival time for lenvatinib of 13·6 months (95% CI 12·1-14·9) was non-inferior to sorafenib (12·3 months, 10·4-13·9; hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·06), meeting criteria for non-inferiority. The most common any-grade adverse events were hypertension (201 [42%]), diarrhoea (184 [39%]), decreased appetite (162 [34%]), and decreased weight (147 [31%]) for lenvatinib, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (249 [52%]), diarrhoea (220 [46%]), hypertension (144 [30%]), and decreased appetite (127 [27%]) for sorafenib. INTERPRETATION Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The safety and tolerability profiles of lenvatinib were consistent with those previously observed. FUNDING Eisai Inc.
-
10.
Outcomes of sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by regorafenib for HCC: Additional analyses from the phase III RESORCE trial.
Finn, RS, Merle, P, Granito, A, Huang, YH, Bodoky, G, Pracht, M, Yokosuka, O, Rosmorduc, O, Gerolami, R, Caparello, C, et al
Journal of hepatology. 2018;(2):353-358
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The RESORCE trial showed that regorafenib improves overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma progressing during sorafenib treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.78; p <0.0001). This exploratory analysis describes outcomes of sequential treatment with sorafenib followed by regorafenib. METHODS In RESORCE, 573 patients were randomized 2:1 to regorafenib 160 mg/day or placebo for 3 weeks on/1 week off. Efficacy and safety were evaluated by last sorafenib dose. The time from the start of sorafenib to death was assessed. Time to progression (TTP) in RESORCE was analyzed by TTP during prior sorafenib treatment. RESULTS HRs (regorafenib/placebo) for OS by last sorafenib dose were similar (0.67 for 800 mg/day; 0.68 for <800 mg/day). Rates of grade 3, 4, and 5 adverse events with regorafenib by last sorafenib dose (800 mg/day vs. <800 mg/day) were 52%, 11%, and 15% vs. 60%, 10%, and 12%, respectively. Median times (95% CI) from the start of sorafenib to death were 26.0 months (22.6-28.1) for regorafenib and 19.2 months (16.3-22.8) for placebo. Median time from the start of sorafenib to progression on sorafenib was 7.2 months for the regorafenib arm and 7.1 months for the placebo arm. An analysis of TTP in RESORCE in subgroups defined by TTP during prior sorafenib in quartiles (Q) showed HRs (regorafenib/placebo; 95% CI) of 0.66 (0.45-0.96; Q1); 0.26 (0.17-0.40; Q2); 0.40 (0.27-0.60; Q3); and 0.54 (0.36-0.81; Q4). CONCLUSIONS These exploratory analyses show that regorafenib conferred a clinical benefit regardless of the last sorafenib dose or TTP on prior sorafenib. Rates of adverse events were generally similar regardless of the last sorafenib dose. LAY SUMMARY This analysis examined characteristics and outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with regorafenib after they had disease progression during sorafenib treatment. Regorafenib provided clinical benefit to patients regardless of the pace of their disease progression during prior sorafenib treatment and regardless of their last sorafenib dose. The sequence of sorafenib followed by regorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma may extend survival beyond what has been previously reported. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01774344.