-
1.
Phenotyping patients with chronic cough: Evaluating the ability to predict the response to anti-inflammatory therapy.
Sadeghi, MH, Wright, CE, Hart, S, Crooks, M, Morice, A
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2018;(3):285-291
Abstract
BACKGROUND Whether the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement can predict the response to anti-inflammatory treatment in chronic cough is unknown. OBJECTIVE To explore whether the effectiveness of treatment with 10 mg of montelukast or 20 mg of prednisolone in patients with chronic cough is predicted by FeNO level. METHODS In this randomized, open-label, controlled pilot study conducted in the Clinical Trial Unit in Castle Hospital in the United Kingdom, 50 nonsmoking patients with a cough that lasted more than 8 weeks were sequentially enrolled in the study. Thirty patients with high FeNO levels (≥30 ppb) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 10 mg of montelukast or 20 mg of prednisolone for 2 weeks followed by 10 mg of montelukast for 2 weeks. Twenty patients with a low FeNO level (≤20 ppb) received 10 mg of montelukast. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of treatment on 24-hour cough counts. RESULTS The 24-hour cough counts decreased in both groups by approximately 50% (P < .005), indicating that FeNO did not predict treatment response. However, it was a good marker for eosinophilic inflammation with a high degree of correlation with blood and sputum eosinophilia (P < .001). CONCLUSION These results suggest that prior investigation may not predict response to anti-inflammatory treatment, which may be consequent on localized leukotriene-mediated inflammation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02479074.
-
2.
Question 2: Is there a role for Montelukast in the management of viral-induced wheeze in preschool children?
Burman, A
Archives of disease in childhood. 2018;(5):519-520
-
3.
Comparison of the efficacy and mechanisms of intranasal budesonide, montelukast, and their combination in treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Chen, H, Lou, H, Wang, Y, Cao, F, Zhang, L, Wang, C
International forum of allergy & rhinology. 2018;(11):1242-1252
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although intranasal steroids and anti-cysteinyl-leukotriene-receptor antagonists are efficacious in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR), combinations of these agents have not unequivocally been demonstrated to be superior to the individual drugs. We aimed to compare the efficacy and potential mechanisms of budesonide nasal spray (BD), oral montelukast (MNT), and combination therapy comprising a half-dose of budesonide plus montelukast (hBD+MNT) in SAR patients. METHODS We performed a single-center, randomized, open-label study in SAR subjects (n = 100). Participants were randomized to receive BD (256 μg), MNT (10 mg), or hBD (128 μg)+MNT for 14 days. Symptom severity scores, nasal cavity volume (NCV), fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), histamine and cysteinyl-leukotrienes (CysLTs), and T-cell subsets were assessed before and after treatment. RESULTS All treatments significantly improved symptoms from baseline; however, hBD+MNT produced significantly greater improvements in nasal congestion compared with BD or MNT alone. The BD and hBD+MNT groups had fewer patients with uncontrolled symptoms and improved NCV to a greater level than the MNT group. FeNO was decreased to a significantly greater extent from baseline after hBD+MNT treatment than after BD and MNT treatments. ECP, histamine, and CysLTs showed significantly greater decreases after BD and hBD+MNT treatments than after MNT treatment. BD decreased T-helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells and increased T-regulatory (Treg) cells in nasal mucosa and MNT decreased Th1 cells and increased Treg cells in peripheral blood, and this trend was reflected with hBD+MNT. CONCLUSION The hBD+MNT combination may have an overall better efficacy profile than BD and MNT monotherapy for treatment of SAR.
-
4.
Treatment with montelukast and antidepressive medication-a symmetry analysis.
Winkel, JS, Damkier, P, Hallas, J, Henriksen, DP
Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2018;(12):1409-1415
Abstract
PURPOSE Leukotriene receptor antagonists are used in asthma and rhinitis treatment. Pharmacovigilance data have suggested an association between montelukast and depression, but the association has not been established in controlled study designs. We described the association between initiation of montelukast and depression, using prescriptions of antidepressants as a surrogate marker, and assessed whether the association was related to the underlying asthma disease. METHODS We performed a symmetry analysis, with a study period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2016, using 3 nationwide Danish registers. We included all adults, who filled their first prescription of montelukast and antidepressants within an interval of 1 year. In the absence of an association between montelukast and antidepressant use, a symmetrical distribution of prescriptions is expected before and after montelukast initiation (ie, a sequence ratio [rc ] of 1.0). We subcategorized the subjects after the severity of underlying asthma disease. RESULTS In total, 4450 subjects filled their first prescriptions of both montelukast and antidepressants within a 1-year interval: 2434 redeemed their first prescription of montelukast before antidepressants, and 2016 redeemed the medications in the opposite order (rc 1.21 [95% CI 1.14-1.28]). We found rc above unity in groups with long-acting asthma treatment, but no increase in antidepressant prescription, when stratifying by the asthma severity. CONCLUSION We found a weak association between the use of montelukast and the risk of being prescribed an antidepressant, unlikely to be of clinical relevance. Stratified analyses suggest that this association may relate to asthma, rather than to montelukast.
-
5.
A systematic review on the off-label use of montelukast in atopic dermatitis treatment.
Chin, WK, Lee, SWH
International journal of clinical pharmacy. 2018;(5):963-976
Abstract
Background Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common form of eczema. As leukotriene mediators are involved in the inflammatory phase of atopic dermatitis, montelukast has been suggested as a possible therapy. Aim of the review To evaluate the safety and efficacy of montelukast off-label use for the treatment atopic dermatitis. Method A search was performed from database inception until March 2018 in six electronic databases for randomized-controlled-trials examining the use of montelukast for AD. Results Among 301 articles screened, 11 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The study populations consist of paediatric and adult subjects with moderate-to-severe AD. Montelukast use was shown to improve symptoms such as pruritus in four studies. Another 2 studies reported that montelukast could improve symptoms similar to the standard regimen of topical steroid and oral antihistamine. However, five studies reported that montelukast had no effects in symptoms alleviation. The use of montelukast was associated with a similar safety profile to placebo and well-tolerated with minimal adverse effects. Conclusion There is limited evidence to suggest that the off-label use of montelukast is effective in treating moderate-to-severe AD. Further research with larger study populations employing standardized endpoint measuring instrument is warranted to further investigate the off-label use of montelukast in AD treatment. Until then, the use of conventional treatments including optimal daily skin hydration should remain the mainstay in the management of atopic dermatitis. In fact, for moderate-to-severe condition, steroid sparing immune-suppressants should still be used clinically until more effective and safer alternative is discovered.
-
6.
An Open-Label, Multi-Institutional, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Additive Effect of a Leukotriene Receptor Antagonist on Cough Score in Patients with Cough-Variant Asthma Being Treated with Inhaled Corticosteroids.
Miwa, N, Nagano, T, Ohnishi, H, Nishiuma, T, Takenaka, K, Shirotani, T, Nakajima, T, Dokuni, R, Kawa, Y, Kobayashi, K, et al
The Kobe journal of medical sciences. 2018;(4):E134-E139
Abstract
Cough-variant asthma is one of the most common reasons for chronic cough. It is important to treat appropriately cough-variant asthma because 30% to 40% of cough-variant asthma becomes a typical asthma. However, little is known about the treatment of cough-variant asthma except for inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The aim of this study was to validate the additive efficacy of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) on cough score and respiratory function in patients with cough-variant asthma being treated with ICS. A total 28 patients were randomly assigned to either an ICS + LTRA group or an ICS group. There were statistically significant improvements in cough scores in the ICS + LTRA group from 0 weeks (6.7 ± 4.4) to 2 weeks (2.9 ± 3.2) (P < 0.05), 4 weeks (0.7 ± 1.1) (P < 0.001), and 8 weeks (0.8 ± 1.2) (P < 0.001). However similar improvements were not evident in the ICS group from 0 weeks (6.7 ± 4.4) to 2 weeks (5.6 ± 10.0) (P = 0.59), 4 weeks (4.6 ± 7.6) (P = 0.32), and 8 weeks (2.9 ± 5.2) (P = 0.08). On the other hand, no significant changes were evident in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC). In conclusion, the LTRA was useful in improving cough in patients with cough-variant asthma, even though it appeared to be ineffective in improving respiratory function.
-
7.
Lack of long-term add-on effect by montelukast in postoperative chronic rhinosinusitis patients with nasal polyps.
Van Gerven, L, Langdon, C, Cordero, A, Cardelús, S, Mullol, J, Alobid, I
The Laryngoscope. 2018;(8):1743-1751
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Eosinophils and mast cells are among the key cells in inflammatory diseases like chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and asthma. Leukotriene antagonists have proven to be effective in the treatment of asthma, but data about their efficacy in CRS are scarce, whereas data on montelukast as an add-on treatment to intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) in a postoperative setting are completely lacking. STUDY DESIGN Prospective, randomized, open-label trial. METHODS In this trial with long-term follow-up, we evaluated the efficacy of montelukast as an add-on treatment to INCS in postoperative CRS with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) patients. CRSwNP patients (N = 72) undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were randomized in two arms for the postoperative treatment. One group (N = 36) received INCS in monotherapy, whereas the other group (N = 36) received INCS in association with montelukast for 1 year. The efficacy of montelukast with INCS was evaluated by assessing both subjective (total five-symptom score [T5SS]) and objective (nasal polyp score [NPS], Lund-Mackay [LMK] score, and subjective olfactometry [Barcelona Smell Test 24]) outcome parameters and compared with the gold standard of INCS in monotherapy. RESULTS After 1 year of surgery, T5SS, NPS, and LMK score were significantly reduced in patients treated with either INCS or INCS plus montelukast, without significant differences between the two treatment arms. Improvement of smell loss by olfactometry was also observed with no differences between arms. Similar findings were observed at 3 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the addition of montelukast to INCS should not be recommended in the treatment of postoperative CRSwNP patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 1b Laryngoscope, 1743-1751, 2018.
-
8.
Montelukast for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation: A randomized controlled trial.
Ruttens, D, Verleden, SE, Demeyer, H, Van Raemdonck, DE, Yserbyt, J, Dupont, LJ, Vanaudenaerde, BM, Vos, R, Verleden, GM
PloS one. 2018;(4):e0193564
Abstract
Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) remains the major problem which precludes long-term survival after lung transplantation. Previously, an open label pilot study from our group demonstrated a possible beneficial effect of montelukast in progressive BOS patients with low airway neutrophilia (<15%), and already on azithromycin treatment, in whom the further decline in pulmonary function was attenuated. This was, however, a non-randomized and non-placebo controlled trial. The study design is a single center, prospective, interventional, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial, with a two arm parallel group design and an allocation ratio of 1:1. Randomization to additional montelukast (10 mg/day, n = 15) or placebo (n = 15) was performed from 2010 to 2014 at the University Hospitals Leuven (Leuven, Belgium) in all consecutive patients with late-onset (>2years posttransplant) BOS ≥1. Primary end-point was freedom from graft loss 1 year after randomization; secondary end-points were acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, respiratory infection rate; and change in FEV1, airway and systemic inflammation during the study period. Graft loss at 1 y and 2y was similar in both groups (respectively p = 0. 981 and p = 0.230). Montelukast had no effect on lung function decline in the overall cohort. However, in a post-hoc subanalysis of BOS stage 1 patients, montelukast attenuated further decline of FEV1 during the study period, both in absolute (L) (p = 0.008) and % predicted value (p = 0.0180). A linear mixed model confirmed this association. Acute rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, respiratory infections, systemic and airway inflammation were comparable between groups over the study period. This randomized controlled trial showed no additional survival benefit with montelukast compared to placebo, although the study was underpowered. The administration of montelukast was associated with an attenuation of the rate of FEV1 decline, however, only in recipients with late-onset BOS stage 1.
-
9.
Montelukast for Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Kheirandish-Gozal, L, Bandla, HP, Gozal, D
Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2016;(10):1736-1741
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in children and is usually treated by adenotonsillectomy. Nonsurgical therapies for OSA consist primarily of antiinflammatory approaches and have gained popularity, but their efficacy remains to be critically examined. OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of montelukast on pediatric OSA. METHODS A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial of polysomnographically diagnosed OSA in children ages 2-10 years who were treated with either oral montelukast (4 or 5 mg daily) or placebo for 16 weeks. Adherence to the medication was ascertained using automated timed pill dispensers along with weekly telephonic reminders. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Ninety-two children diagnosed with OSA were approached, and 64 (69.6%) agreed to participate. Of these, 57 (89.0%) completed the 16-week trial, 28 in the montelukast group and 29 in the placebo group. Age, sex, and percentage of obesity were similar in the two groups, as were initial apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores. Overall, intention-to-treat analyses revealed that beneficial effects occurred in 20 children receiving montelukast (71.4%), whereas only 2 (6.9%) of the children receiving placebo showed reductions in AHI score (P < 0.001). Indeed, AHI decreased from 9.2 ± 4.1/hour total sleep time (TST) to 4.2 ± 2.8/hour TST (P < 0.0001) in montelukast-treated children, whereas in children receiving placebo, the AHI did not change (from 8.2 ± 5.0/h TST before to 8.7 ± 4.9/h TST at completion of the trial). CONCLUSIONS When compared with placebo, montelukast for 16 weeks effectively reduced the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in children 2-10 years of age. These results support a therapeutic role for leukotriene modifiers in pediatric OSA provided that long-term trials confirm current findings. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 00599534).
-
10.
Leukotriene receptor antagonists as maintenance or intermittent treatment in pre-school children with episodic viral wheeze.
Brodlie, M, Gupta, A, Rodriguez-Martinez, CE, Castro-Rodriguez, JA, Ducharme, FM, McKean, MC
Paediatric respiratory reviews. 2016;:57-9