-
1.
[Mortality and associated prognostic factors in elderly and very elderly hospitalized patients with respiratory disease COVID-19].
Águila-Gordo, D, Martínez-Del Río, J, Mazoteras-Muñoz, V, Negreira-Caamaño, M, Nieto-Sandoval Martín de la Sierra, P, Piqueras-Flores, J
Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia. 2021;(5):259-267
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Elderly patients with COVID-19 has a worse clinical evolution, being more susceptible to develop serious manifestations. The differences between the elderly and very elderly population, mortality and associated prognostic factors of SARS-CoV-2 infection have not been enough studied yet. METHODS An observational study of 416 elderly patients admitted consecutively to Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real for COVID-19 respiratory infection from March 1st to April 30th, 2020. Data were collected including patient demographic information, medical history, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, therapeutic interventions and clinical outcomes during the hospitalization and after discharge, until June 15, 2020 with the aim of analyzing mortality, and associated prognostic factors. RESULTS The mean age was 84.43±5.74 years old; elderly patients (75-84 years) were 50.2% of the sample and very elderly (≥85 years) the remaining 49.8%. In Cox regression model, mortality rate was higher in very elderly group (HR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.23-5.38; P = .01), hypertensive (HR = 3, 45; 95% CI: 1.13-10.5; P = .03) and chronic kidney disease patients (HR = 3.86; 95% CI: 1.3-11.43; P = .02). In contrast, calcium antagonists (HR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.62; P = .002) and anticoagulant therapy during hospitalization (HR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.08 0, 83; P = .02) were associated with a longer time free of mortality. CONCLUSIONS Mortality rate was higher in very eldery patients compared with eldery; and in hypertensive and chronic kidney disease patients. Anticoagulation therapy and calcium chanel bloquers treatment during hospitalization were associated with a higher survival in the short-term follow-up in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
-
2.
Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal, blood, urine, and stool samples of patients with COVID-19: a hospital-based longitudinal study.
Joukar, F, Yaghubi Kalurazi, T, Khoshsorour, M, Taramian, S, Mahfoozi, L, Balou, HA, Jafarinezhad, A, Pourkazemi, A, Hesni, E, Asgharnezhad, M, et al
Virology journal. 2021;(1):134
Abstract
BACKGROUND The persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA in the body fluids of patients with the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may increase the potential risk of viral transmission. There is still uncertainty on whether the recommended quarantine duration is sufficient to reduce the risk of transmission. This study aimed to investigate the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal, blood, urine, and stool samples of patients with COVID-19. METHODS In this hospital-based longitudinal study, 100 confirmed cases of COVID-19 were recruited between March 2020 and August 2020 in Guilan Province, north of Iran. Nasopharyngeal, blood, urine, and stool samples were obtained from each participant at the time of hospital admission, upon discharge, 1 week after discharge, and every 2 weeks until all samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. A survival analysis was also performed to identify the duration of viral persistence. RESULTS The median duration of viral RNA persistence in the nasopharyngeal samples was 8 days from the first positive RT-PCR result upon admission (95% CI 6.91-9.09); the maximum duration of viral shedding was 25 days from admission. Positive blood, urine, and stool RT-PCR results were detected in 24%, 7%, and 6% of the patients, respectively. The median duration of viral persistence in the blood, urine, and stool samples was 7 days (95% CI 6.07-7.93), 6 days (95% CI 4.16-8.41), and 13 days (95% CI 6.96-19.4), respectively. Also, the maximum duration of viral persistence in the blood, urine, and stool samples was 17, 11, and 42 days from admission, respectively. CONCLUSION According to the present results, immediately after the hospitalized patients were discharged, no evidence of viral genetic materials was found. Therefore, appropriate treatments were selected for the patients at this hospital. However, we recommend further investigations on a larger sample size in multi-center and prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effects of different drugs on the shedding of the virus through body secretions.
-
3.
Renal supportive care programs: An observational study assessing impact on hospitalization and survival outcomes.
Chia, XX, Johnston, R, Aggarwal, R, Huynh, T, Notaras, S, Zekanovic, D, Gordon, K, Sasongko, V, Makris, A
Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.). 2021;(6):522-529
Abstract
AIM: Renal supportive care (RSC) programs are used to manage non-dialysis end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of RSC programs on hospitalization and survival outcomes in these patients. METHODS A retrospective, single-centre observational cohort study of non-dialysis ESKD patients was undertaken. Hospitalizations and survival from eGFR≤15 ml/min was compared between patients managed in an RSC program (RSC group) and patients receiving standard conservative therapy (non-RSC group). Local databases, physician letters and electronic medical records were used for data collection. Prevalent patients from 2013 to 2017 with eGFR ≤15 ml/min were included. Cox proportion hazard testing and generalized linear modelling was undertaken to adjust for confounders. RESULTS A total of 172 patients were included (95 RSC; 75 non-RSC). The median age was 82 years [IQR 78-85], 46% were male, the median Charlson-comorbidity Index was 5 [IQR 4-7]. The RSC group had significantly lowered haemoglobin level (102 g/L vs. 111 g/L) and fewer English-speakers (34% vs. 44%). RSC was associated with the decreased number of days in hospital per year (estimated means 46.6 days [95% CI 21-67] vs. 83.2 days [95%CI 60.5-105.8]; p = .01) and decreased number of hospital admissions per year (estimated means 5.4 [95%CI 2.1-8.8] vs. 12.3 [95%CI 8.2-16.4]; p = .01) compared with non-RSC. Median overall survival from eGFR≤15 in the entire cohort was 735 days, with no significant difference between RSC and non-RSC groups (p = .9), both unadjusted and adjusted for confounders. CONCLUSION RSC programs can significantly decrease the number and length of hospitalizations in conservatively managed ESKD patients.
-
4.
Risk of COVID 19 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases compared to a control population.
Maconi, G, Bosetti, C, De Monti, A, Boyapati, RK, Shelton, E, Piazza, N, Carvalhas Gabrielli, AM, Lenti, MV, Bezzio, C, Ricci, C, et al
Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver. 2021;(3):263-270
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of COVID-19. OBJECTIVES This observational study compared the prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization in IBD patients with a control population with non-inflammatory bowel disorders. METHODS This multicentre study, included 2733 outpatients (1397 IBD patients and 1336 controls), from eight major gastrointestinal centres in Lombardy, Italy. Patients were invited to complete a web-based questionnaire regarding demographic, historical and clinical features over the previous 6 weeks. The prevalence of COVID-19 symptoms, diagnosis and hospitalization for COVID-19 was assessed. RESULTS 1810 patients (64%) responded to the questionnaire (941 IBD patients and 869 controls). IBD patients were significantly younger and of male sex than controls. NSAID use and smoking were more frequent in controls. IBD patients were more likely treated with vitamin-D and vaccinated for influenza. Highly probable COVID-19 on the basis of symptoms and signs was less frequent in the IBD group (3.8% vs 6.3%; OR:0.45, 95%CI:0.28-0.75). IBD patients had a lower rate of nasopharyngeal swab-PCR confirmed diagnosis (0.2% vs 1.2%; OR:0.14, 95%CI:0.03-0.67). There was no difference in hospitalization between the groups (0.1% vs 0.6%; OR:0.14, 95%CI:0.02-1.17). CONCLUSION IBD patients do not have an increased risk of COVID-19 specific symptoms or more severe disease compared with a control group of gastroenterology patients.
-
5.
Factors associated with heart failure hospitalization in patients with high sodium excretion: subanalysis of the ESPRIT, evaluation of sodium intake for the prediction of cardiovascular events in Japanese high-risk patients, cohort study.
Sadanaga, T, Hirota, S, Mitamura, H
Heart and vessels. 2021;(1):85-91
Abstract
We have reported that high sodium excretion ≥ 4.0 g/day, assessed by repeated measurements of spot urine, is associated with composite cardiovascular (CV) events of heart failure (HF) hospitalization, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular events, and documented CV deaths in Japanese high-risk patients with either stable and compensated congestive HF, high brain natriuretic peptide, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or atrial fibrillation. A total of 520 patients were enrolled. During the median follow-up period of 5.2 years, 105 (20%) experienced composite CV events, which were predominantly driven by 60 (12%) HF hospitalizations. The aim of the present study was to elucidate which subgroups of patients with high sodium excretion were associated with HF hospitalization. We divided the enrolled patients into three groups according to the amount of sodium excretion (< 3.0 g/day, 3.0-3.99 g/day (reference), and ≥ 4.0 g/day) based on a median of 14 measurements during follow-up. We assessed the hazard ratio for HF hospitalization according to age, bodyweight, and gender, using the Cox hazard model. In the total population, high sodium excretion ≥ 4.0 g/day was associated with HF hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.83] after adjustment for gender, age, and bodyweight, but was not associated with other CV events. In older patients (≥ 75 years old), high sodium excretion ≥ 4.0 g/day was associated with HF hospitalization after adjustment for gender and bodyweight (HR 3.25, CI 1.55-6.55), which was not observed in younger (< 75 years old) patients. In patients with lower bodyweight (< 60 kg), high sodium excretion ≥ 4.0 g/day was associated with HF hospitalization after adjustment for age and gender (HR 3.05, CI 1.34-6.61), which was not observed in heavier (≥ 60 kg) patients. High sodium excretion is associated with HF hospitalization in patients with older age and lower bodyweight in Japanese high-risk patients.
-
6.
The Effect of Vitamin C on Pathological Parameters and Survival Duration of Critically Ill Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Majidi, N, Rabbani, F, Gholami, S, Gholamalizadeh, M, BourBour, F, Rastgoo, S, Hajipour, A, Shadnoosh, M, Akbari, ME, Bahar, B, et al
Frontiers in immunology. 2021;:717816
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vitamin C has been reported to have beneficial effects on patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to investigate the effect of vitamin C supplementation on pathological parameters and survival duration of critically ill patients with COVID-19. METHODS This clinical trial was conducted on 120 hospitalized critically ill patients infected with COVID-19. The intervention group (n = 31) received one capsule of 500 mg of vitamin C daily for 14 days. The control group (n = 69) received the same nutrition except for vitamin C supplements. Measurement of pathological and biochemical parameters was performed at baseline and after 2 weeks of the intervention. RESULTS Following 2 weeks of vitamin C supplementation, the level of serum K was significantly lower in the patients compared with the control group (3.93 vs. 4.21 mEq/L, p < 0.01). Vitamin C supplementation resulted in a higher mean survival duration compared with that of the control group (8 vs. 4 days, p < 0.01). There was a linear association between the number of days of vitamin C intake and survival duration (B = 1.66, p < 0.001). The vitamin C supplementation had no effect on blood glucose, mean arterial pressure, arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), kidney function, cell blood count (CBC), hemoglobin (Hb), platelet (Plt), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), albumin, hematocrit (Hct), and other serum electrolytes including sodium (Na), calcium, and phosphorus (P). CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated the potential of vitamin C supplementation in enhancing the survival duration of critically ill patients with COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://www.irct.ir/trial/55074, identifier IRCT20151226025699N5.
-
7.
Molnupiravir in COVID-19: A systematic review of literature.
Singh, AK, Singh, A, Singh, R, Misra, A
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;(6):102329
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Molnupiravir is a newer oral antiviral drug that has recently been tested in COVID-19. We aim to conduct a systematic review of literature to find out the efficacy and safety of molnupiravir in patients with COVID-19. METHODS We systematically searched the electronic database of PubMed, MedRxiv and Google Scholar from inception until October 15, 2021, using MeSH keywords. Ongoing trials of molnupiravir in COVID-19 were additionally searched from the ClinicalTrials.Gov and ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials. We retrieved all the available granular details of phase 1 to 3 studies of molnupiravir in COVID-19. Subsequently we reviewed the results narratively. RESULTS Two phase 1 double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled (DBRPC) studies of molnupiravir showed that 1600 mg daily dose is safe and tolerable, without any serious adverse events up to 5.5 days. One phase 2 DBPRC study found significantly lower time to clearance (RNA negativity) with molnupiravir 800 mg twice daily compared to the placebo (log-rank p value = 0.013) in mild to moderate COVID-19. Interim report of one phase 3 DBRPC study in non-hospitalized COVID-19 found a significant reduction in the risk of hospital admission or death by 50% (p = 0.0012). However, no significant benefit was observed with molnupiravir in the later stage of moderate to severe COVID-19. CONCLUSION Molnupiravir is first oral antiviral drug to demonstrate a significant benefit in reducing hospitalization or death in mild COVID-19 and could be an important weapon in the battle against SARS-CoV-2. However, its role in moderate to severe COVID-19 is questionable and more studies are needed.
-
8.
Blood glucose levels should be considered as a new vital sign indicative of prognosis during hospitalization.
Kesavadev, J, Misra, A, Saboo, B, Aravind, SR, Hussain, A, Czupryniak, L, Raz, I
Diabetes & metabolic syndrome. 2021;(1):221-227
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The measurement of vital signs is an important part of clinical work up. Presently, measurement of blood glucose is a factor for concern mostly when treating individuals with diabetes. Significance of blood glucose measurement in prognosis of non-diabetic and hospitalized patients is not clear. METHODS A systematic search of literature published in the Electronic databases, PubMed and Google Scholar was performed using following keywords; blood glucose, hospital admissions, critical illness, hospitalizations, cardiovascular disease (CVD), morbidity, and mortality. This literature search was largely restricted to non-diabetic individuals. RESULTS Blood glucose level, even when in high normal range, or in slightly high range, is an important determinant of morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized patients. Further, even slight elevation of blood glucose may increase mortality in patients with COVID-19. Finally, blood glucose variability and hypoglycemia in critically ill individuals without diabetes causes excess in-hospital complications and mortality. CONCLUSION In view of these data, we emphasize the significance of blood glucose measurement in all patients admitted to the hospital regardless of presence of diabetes. We propose that blood glucose be included as the "fifth vital sign" for any hospitalized patient.
-
9.
Impact of Inadequate Calorie Intake on Mortality and Hospitalization in Stable Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.
Obata, Y, Kakutani, N, Kinugawa, S, Fukushima, A, Yokota, T, Takada, S, Ono, T, Sota, T, Kinugasa, Y, Takahashi, M, et al
Nutrients. 2021;(3)
Abstract
Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF), but the precise impact of dietary energy deficiency on HF patients' clinical outcomes is not known. We investigated the associations between inadequate calorie intake and adverse clinical events in 145 stable outpatients with chronic HF who had a history of hospitalization due to worsening HF. To assess the patients' dietary pattern, we used a brief self-administered diet-history questionnaire (BDHQ). Inadequate calorie intake was defined as <60% of the estimated energy requirement. In the total chronic HF cohort, the median calorie intake was 1628 kcal/day. Forty-four patients (30%) were identified as having an inadequate calorie intake. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the patients with inadequate calorie intake had significantly worse clinical outcomes including all-cause death and HF-related hospitalization during the 1-year follow-up period versus those with adequate calorie intake (20% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that inadequate calorie intake was an independent predictor of adverse clinical events after adjustment for various factors that may influence patients' calorie intake. Among patients with chronic HF, inadequate calorie intake was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization due to worsening HF. However, our results are preliminary and larger studies with direct measurements of dietary calorie intake and total energy expenditure are needed to clarify the intrinsic nature of this relationship.
-
10.
Vitamin D and Hospital Admission in Older Adults: A Prospective Association.
Beirne, A, McCarroll, K, Walsh, JB, Casey, M, Laird, E, McNulty, H, Ward, M, Hoey, L, Molloy, AM, Healy, M, et al
Nutrients. 2021;(2)
Abstract
The health effects of vitamin D are well documented, with increasing evidence of its roles beyond bone. There is, however, little evidence of the effects of vitamin D on hospitalisation among older adults. This study aimed to prospectively determine the relationship of vitamin D status in older adults with hospital admission and emergency department (ED) attendance. Trinity University of Ulster Department of Agriculture (TUDA) is a large cross-sectional study of older adults with a community population from three disease-defined cohorts (cognitive dysfunction, hypertension, and osteoporosis). Participants included in this analysis were recruited between 2008 and 2012. ED and hospital admission data were gathered from the date of TUDA participation until June 2013, with a mean follow up of 3.6 years. Of the 3093 participants, 1577 (50.9%) attended the ED during the period of follow-up. Attendees had lower mean serum 25(OH)D concentrations than non-attendees (59.1 vs. 70.6 nmol/L). Fully adjusted models showed an inverse association between vitamin D and ED attendance (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.996; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.995-0.998; p < 0.001). A total of 1269 participants (41%) were admitted to hospital during the follow-up. Those admitted had lower mean vitamin D concentrations (58.4 vs. 69.3 nmol/L, p < 0.001). In fully adjusted models, higher vitamin D was inversely associated with hospital admission (HR 0.996; 95% CI 0.994-0.998; p < 0.001) and length of stay (LOS) (β = -0.95, p = 0.006). This study showed independent prospective associations between vitamin D deficiency and increased hospitalisation by older adults. The need for further evaluation of current recommendations in relation to vitamin D supplementation, with consideration beyond bone health, is warranted and should focus on randomised controlled trials.