-
1.
Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate in Patients with High Triglyceride and Low HDL Cholesterol Levels: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.
Arai, H, Yamashita, S, Yokote, K, Araki, E, Suganami, H, Ishibashi, S, ,
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2018;(6):521-538
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: To verify the superiority of pemafibrate over placebo and the non-inferiority of pemafibrate to the maximum dose of fenofibrate for determining the percent change in fasting serum triglyceride (TG) levels and to investigate safety by assessing the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). METHODS This phase III, placebo/active drug-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group comparison study enrolled patients with high TG and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, or 0.4 mg/day; or fenofibrate 100 mg/day or 200 mg/day for 12 weeks. RESULTS Among 526 randomized patients, 489 completed the study, with drop-out rates of 0%, 6.7%, 5.5%, 5.9%, 8.2%, and 10.7% in the placebo; pemafibrate 0.1 mg/day, 0.2 mg/day, and 0.4 mg/day; and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and 200 mg/day groups. The study showed the non-inferiority of pemafibrate 0.4 mg/day and 0.2 mg/day to fenofibrate 200 mg/day as well the non-inferiority and superiority of all pemafibrate doses to fenofibrate 100 mg/day for reducing TG levels. No dose-dependent increase in the incidence of AEs or ADRs was observed among the pemafibrate dose groups. The incidence of AEs and ADRs for all pemafibrate doses was similar to that for placebo and fenofibrate 100 mg/day and significantly lower than that for fenofibrate 200 mg/day (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The favorable safety profile of pemafibrate, with fewer adverse effects on kidney/liver-related laboratory tests and fewer AEs/ADRs, including those leading to treatment discontinuation, over fenofibrate 200 mg/day may justify the use of this novel and potent treatment option for reducing TG levels in a broader range of patients.
-
2.
Predicting the Effect of Fenofibrate on Cardiovascular Risk for Individual Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Koopal, C, Visseren, FLJ, Westerink, J, van der Graaf, Y, Ginsberg, HN, Keech, AC
Diabetes care. 2018;(6):1244-1250
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In clinical trials, treatment with fenofibrate did not reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MCVE) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, treatment effects reported by trials comprise patients who respond poorly and patients who respond well to fenofibrate. Our aim was to use statistical modeling to estimate the expected treatment effect of fenofibrate for individual patients with T2DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS To estimate individual risk, the FIELD risk model, with 5-year MCVE as primary outcome, was externally validated in T2DM patients from ACCORD and the SMART observational cohort. Fenofibrate treatment effect was estimated in 17,142 T2DM patients from FIELD, ACCORD, and SMART. Individual treatment effect, expressed as absolute risk reduction (ARR), is the difference between treated and untreated MCVE risk. Results were stratified for patients with and without dyslipidemia (i.e., high triglycerides and low LDL cholesterol). RESULTS External validation of the FIELD risk model showed good calibration and moderate discrimination in ACCORD (C-statistic 0.67 [95% CI 0.65-0.69]) and SMART (C-statistic 0.66 [95% CI 0.63-0.69]). Median 5-year MCVE risk in all three studies combined was 6.7% (interquartile range [IQR] 4.0-11.7) in patients without (N = 13,224) and 9.4% (IQR 5.4-16.1%) in patients with (N = 3,918) dyslipidemia. The median ARR was 2.15% (IQR 1.23-3.68) in patients with dyslipidemia, corresponding with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 47, and 0.22% (IQR 0.13-0.38) in patients without dyslipidemia (NNT 455). CONCLUSIONS In individual patients with T2DM, there is a wide range of absolute treatment effect of fenofibrate, and overall the fenofibrate treatment effect was larger in patients with dyslipidemia. The method of individualized treatment effect prediction of fenofibrate on MCVE risk reduction in T2DM can be used to guide clinical decision making.
-
3.
Fenofibrate for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Stewart, S, Lois, N
Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2018;(6):422-426
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Fenofibrate is a safe and inexpensive orally administered fibric acid derivative conventionally used to treat dyslipidemia. Two large randomized clinical trials, the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) studies, demonstrated the benefit of oral fenofibrate in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR), including reduced disease progression and need for laser treatment for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. These findings are supported by results of experimental studies, which have demonstrated beneficial effects of fenofibrate ameliorating retinal vascular leakage and leukostasis, downregulating vascular endothelial growth factor, and reducing endothelial cell and pericyte loss, among others; all of these are characteristic features of DR. In spite of this evidence, fenofibrate is not prescribed routinely for treating patients with diabetes and DR. In FIELD and ACCORD studies, retinopathy was not the primary outcome and this may explain, at least partly, its lack of use for this indication. New trials are now underway to specifically address the effects of fenofibrate in DR; these trials will provide additional and robust data that may support current evidence favoring the use of fenofibrate in this common microvascular complication of diabetes.
-
4.
A mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model of fenofibrate for explaining increased drug absorption after food consumption.
Back, HM, Song, B, Pradhan, S, Chae, JW, Han, N, Kang, W, Chang, MJ, Zheng, J, Kwon, KI, Karlsson, MO, et al
BMC pharmacology & toxicology. 2018;(1):4
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral administration of drugs is convenient and shows good compliance but it can be affected by many factors in the gastrointestinal (GI) system. Consumption of food is one of the major factors affecting the GI system and consequently the absorption of drugs. The aim of this study was to develop a mechanistic GI absorption model for explaining the effect of food on fenofibrate pharmacokinetics (PK), focusing on the food type and calorie content. METHODS Clinical data from a fenofibrate PK study involving three different conditions (fasting, standard meals and high-fat meals) were used. The model was developed by nonlinear mixed effect modeling method. Both linear and nonlinear effects were evaluated to explain the impact of food intake on drug absorption. Similarly, to explain changes in gastric emptying time for the drug due to food effects was evaluated. RESULTS The gastric emptying rate increased by 61.7% during the first 6.94 h after food consumption. Increased calories in the duodenum increased the absorption rate constant of the drug in fed conditions (standard meal = 16.5%, high-fat meal = 21.8%) compared with fasted condition. The final model displayed good prediction power and precision. CONCLUSIONS A mechanistic GI absorption model for quantitatively evaluating the effects of food on fenofibrate absorption was successfully developed, and acceptable parameters were obtained. The mechanism-based PK model of fenofibrate can quantify the effects of food on drug absorption by food type and calorie content.
-
5.
Efficiency of fenofibrate in facilitating the reduction of central macular thickness in diabetic macular edema.
Srinivasan, S, Hande, P, Shetty, J, Murali, S
Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2018;(1):98-105
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to study the benefit of addition of oral fenofibrate to the current regimen of diabetic macular edema (DME) management and quantify its effect on macular thickness and visual function in DME. METHODS Fifty-three eyes of 50 patients were randomized into treatment (Group A) (oral fenofibrate 160 mg/day) and control groups (Group B). Both groups underwent treatment of DME as per the standard treatment protocol of our hospital including intravitreal injections (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/steroid) and grid laser. Patients were followed up every 2 months to note the visual acuity and central macular thickness (CMT) for 6 months. RESULTS Our groups were matched with respect to age (P = 0.802), mean diabetic age (P = 0.878), serum HbA1C levels (P = 0.523), and serum triglyceride levels (P = 0.793). The mean reduction in CMT was 136 μ in Group A and 83 μ in Group B at the end of 6 months. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.031). Visual acuity improvement was 0.15 in Group A and 0.11 in Group B at the end of 6 months (P = 0.186). On subgroup analysis in Group A, we found that there was no difference in reduction of CMT between hypertensives and normotensives (P = 0.916), in patients with normal triglyceride levels and increased triglyceride levels (P = 0.975). CONCLUSION Addition of fenofibrate to the standard protocol of DME management seems to facilitate reduction of CMT and probably have an added benefit on the visual functions.
-
6.
Fenofibrate monotherapy-induced rhabdomyolysis in a patient with hypothyroidism: A rare case report and literature review.
Wang, D, Wang, Y
Medicine. 2018;(14):e0318
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
RATIONALE Fenofibrate is a fibric acid derivative indicated for use in hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia treatment among adults. Rhabdomyolysis is a syndrome characterized by muscle necrosis and the release of intracellular muscle contents into the systemic circulation, which is the most serious and fatal side effect of fenofibrate. The objective of this paper is to discuss fatal side effect of fenofibrate and keep safe medication. PATIENT CONCERNS A patient with hypothyroidism who presented with rhabdomyolysis during fenofibrate monotherapy for hypertriglyceridemia was reported. DIAGNOSES Fenofibrate Monotherapy Induced Rhabdomyolysis. INTERVENTIONS Fenofibrate was stopped. Adequate fluid resuscitation, mannitol diuresis, myocardium protection, hepatoprotection and urine alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate were performed. OUTCOMES Blood tests were normal and the patient was good and discharged 2 weeks later. LESSONS 13 cases associated with fenofibrate monotherapy-induced rhabdomyolysis were reviewed, which had been published in the English literature. The severity of fenofibrate muscle toxicity may be the result of the combination of two rhabdomyolysis enhancers, such as hypothyroidism and female gender. To avoid it, strict clinical and laboratory monitoring should be maintained, particularly hypothyroidism. Patients should be informed of possible potentially irreversible effects after taking fibrates.
-
7.
Association of Fenofibrate Therapy With Long-term Cardiovascular Risk in Statin-Treated Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Elam, MB, Ginsberg, HN, Lovato, LC, Corson, M, Largay, J, Leiter, LA, Lopez, C, O'Connor, PJ, Sweeney, ME, Weiss, D, et al
JAMA cardiology. 2017;(4):370-380
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients with type 2 diabetes are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in part owing to hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. It is unknown whether adding triglyceride-lowering treatment to statin reduces this risk. OBJECTIVE To determine whether fenofibrate reduces CVD risk in statin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Posttrial follow-up of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Lipid Study between July 2009 and October 2014; 5 years of follow-up were completed for a total of 9.7 years at general community and academic outpatient research clinics in the United States and Canada. Of the original 5518 ACCORD Lipid Trial participants, 4644 surviving participants were selected based on the presence of type 2 diabetes and either prevalent CVD or CVD risk factors and high-density lipoprotein levels less than 50 mg/dL (<55 mg/dL for women and African American individuals). INTERVENTIONS Passive follow-up of study participants previously treated with fenofibrate or masked placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes including primary composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke in all participants and in prespecified subgroups. RESULTS The 4644 follow-on study participants were broadly representative of the original ACCORD study population and included significant numbers of women (n = 1445; 31%), nonwhite individuals (n = 1094; 21%), and those with preexisting cardiovascular events (n = 1620; 35%). Only 4.3% of study participants continued treatment with fenofibrate following completion of ACCORD. High-density lipoprotein and triglyceride values rapidly equalized among participants originally randomized to fenofibrate or placebo. Over a median total postrandomization follow-up of 9.7 years, the hazard ratio (HR) for the primary study outcome among participants originally randomized to fenofibrate vs placebo (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83-1.05; P = .25) was comparable with that originally observed in ACCORD (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79-1,08; P = .32). Despite these overall neutral results, we continued to find evidence that fenofibrate therapy effectively reduced CVD in study participants with dyslipidemia, defined as triglyceride levels greater than 204 mg/dL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels less than 34 mg/dL (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56-0.95). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Extended follow-up of ACCORD-lipid trial participants confirms the original neutral effect of fenofibrate in the overall study cohort. The continued observation of heterogeneity of treatment response by baseline lipids suggests that fenofibrate therapy may reduce CVD in patients with diabetes with hypertriglyceridemia and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. A definitive trial of fibrate therapy in this patient population is needed to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00000620.
-
8.
Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Coadministration of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe in Patients with Combined Hyperlipidemia: Results of the EFECTL Study.
Oikawa, S, Yamashita, S, Nakaya, N, Sasaki, J, Kono, S, ,
Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. 2017;(1):77-94
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
AIM: We investigated the safety and efficacy of a long-term combination therapy with fenofibrate and ezetimibe in Japanese patients with combined hyperlipidemia, in comparison with fenofibrate or ezetimibe alone. METHODS The study was a three-arm parallel-group, open-label randomized trial. Eligible patients were assigned to a combination therapy with fenofibrate (200 mg/day in capsule form or 160 mg/day in tablet form) and ezetimibe (10 mg/day), the fenofibrate monotherapy, or the ezetimibe monotherapy, which lasted for 52 weeks. The changes in serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglycerides were the primary outcomes. RESULTS A total of 236 patients were assigned to one of the three treatments, and the number of patients included in the final analysis was 107 in the combination therapy, 52 in the fenofibrate monotherapy, and 51 in the ezetimibe monotherapy. Mean±SD changes in LDL cholesterol were -24.2%±14.7% with combination therapy, -16.0%±16.0% with fenofibrate alone, and -17.4%± 10.1% with ezetimibe alone. The combination therapy resulted in a significantly greater reduction in LDL cholesterol as compared with each monotherapy (p<0.01 for each). The corresponding values for triglycerides were -40.0%±29.5%, -40.1%±28.7%, and -3.4%±32.6%, respectively. Fenofibrate use was associated with some changes in laboratory measurements, but there was no differential adverse effect between the combination therapy and fenofibrate monotherapy. CONCLUSION The combination therapy with fenofibrate and ezetimibe substantially reduces concentrations of LDL cholesterol and triglycerides and is safe in a long-term treatment in Japanese patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
-
9.
Dynamic dissolution-/permeation-testing of nano- and microparticle formulations of fenofibrate.
Sironi, D, Rosenberg, J, Bauer-Brandl, A, Brandl, M
European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017;:20-27
Abstract
The aim of the current study was to evaluate a dynamic dissolution-/permeation-system for prediction of gastrointestinal and absorption-behavior of two commercial fenofibrate formulations. To this end, both dissolution and barrier-flux were followed simultaneously for fenofibrate powder, a microparticle formulation (Lipidil® 200mg) and a nanoparticle formulation (LIPIDIL 145 ONE®) using a pair of side-by side diffusion cells separated by a cellulose hydrate membrane. Under such dynamic conditions, transient supersaturation arising from the nanoparticle formulation could be demonstrated for the first time. Furthermore, the dissolution-/permeation-system introduced here allowed for in-depth mechanistic insights: Biomimetic media, despite enhancing the apparent solubility of fenofibrate via micellar solubilization, did not increase permeation rate, irrespective whether the micro-/ or nanoparticle-formulation was tested. Nondissolved nano-/microparticles served as a reservoir helping to maintain high levels of molecularly dissolved drug, which in turn caused high and constant permeation rates. The micelle-bound drug may also serve as a drug-reservoir, yet of subordinate importance as long as there are nano-/microparticles present. Despite the limitations of the current experimental set-up, combined dissolution-/permeation-testing appears a valuable new tool to promote mechanistic understanding during formulation development. Last but not least, the in vitro dissolution and permeation behavior revealed here was in good qualitative agreement with human duodenal and plasma values reported in literature for the same formulations.
-
10.
Metabolic Inflexibility with Obesity and the Effects of Fenofibrate on Skeletal Muscle Fatty Acid Oxidation.
Boyle, KE, Friedman, JE, Janssen, RC, Underkofler, C, Houmard, JA, Rasouli, N
Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2017;(1):50-57
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate mechanisms of lipid metabolic inflexibility in human obesity and the ability of fenofibrate (FENO) to increase skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation (FAO) in primary human skeletal muscle cell cultures (HSkMC) exhibiting metabolic inflexibility. HSkMC from 10 lean and 10 obese, insulin resistant subjects were treated with excess fatty acid for 24 h (24hFA) to gauge lipid-related metabolic flexibility. Metabolically inflexible HSkMC from obese individuals were then treated with 24hFA in combination with FENO to determine effectiveness for increasing FAO. Mitochondrial enzyme activity and FAO were measured in skeletal muscle from subjects with prediabetes (n=11) before and after 10 weeks of fenofibrate in vivo. 24hFA increased FAO to a greater extent in HSkMC from lean versus obese subjects (+49% vs. +9%, for lean vs. obese, respectively; p<0.05) indicating metabolic inflexibility with obesity. Metabolic inflexibility was not observed for measures of cellular respiration in permeabilized cells using carbohydrate substrate. Fenofibrate co-incubation with 24hFA, increased FAO in a subset of HSkMC from metabolically inflexible, obese subjects (p<0.05), which was eliminated by PPARα antagonist. In vivo, fenofibrate treatment increased skeletal muscle FAO in a subset of subjects with prediabetes but did not affect gene transcription or mitochondrial enzyme activity. Lipid metabolic inflexibility observed in HSkMC from obese subjects is not due to differences in electron transport flux, but rather upstream decrements in lipid metabolism. Fenofibrate increases the capacity for FAO in human skeletal muscle cells, though its role in skeletal muscle metabolism in vivo remains unclear.