-
1.
Probiotics Ameliorate Stool Consistency in Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Yoon, JY, Cha, JM, Oh, JK, Tan, PL, Kim, SH, Kwak, MS, Jeon, JW, Shin, HP
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2018;(10):2754-2764
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: The efficacy of probiotics for improving clinical symptoms, altering the fecal microbiota, and regulating serum immune cytokine levels was investigated in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-constipation (IBS-C) or functional constipation (FC). METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Kyung Hee University Hospital between October 2016 and February 2017. Consecutive 18-75-year-old patients with diagnosis of IBS-C or FC (based on Rome IV criteria) consumed probiotics (3.0 × 108 CFU/g Streptococcus thermophilus MG510 and 1.0 × 108 CFU/g Lactobacillus plantarum LRCC5193) or a placebo daily for 4 weeks (weeks 1-4) and were followed up for a 4-week washout period without intervention (weeks 5-8). The primary outcomes of the study were Bristol Stool Form Scale and Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movements (CSBM). Efficacy was assessed by per protocol. RESULTS Stool consistency measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale was significantly better in the probiotic group (n = 88) than in the placebo group (n = 83) at 4 and 8 weeks (3.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.1 ± 1.1 at 8 weeks, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found in CSBM. The quality of life was significantly better in the probiotic group than in the placebo group at 4 weeks (P = 0.044) and 8 weeks (P = 0.049). The relative abundance of L. plantarum among the fecal microbiomes was significantly greater in the probiotic group than in the placebo group at 4 weeks (P = 0.029). However, the levels of other microbiomes and of serum cytokines (IL-10/IL-12 ratio and TNF-α) did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics significantly ameliorated stool consistency in patients with chronic constipation. In addition, the beneficial effect of L. plantarum on stool consistency remained after the probiotic supplementation was discontinued. The mechanism whereby probiotics benefit patients with chronic constipation should be clarified in further studies.
-
2.
Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection.
Best, LM, Takwoingi, Y, Siddique, S, Selladurai, A, Gandhi, A, Low, B, Yaghoobi, M, Gurusamy, KS
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2018;(3):CD012080
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively. SELECTION CRITERIA We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities. MAIN RESULTS We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.
-
3.
Volatile Organic Compounds in Feces Associate With Response to Dietary Intervention in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Rossi, M, Aggio, R, Staudacher, HM, Lomer, MC, Lindsay, JO, Irving, P, Probert, C, Whelan, K
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2018;(3):385-391.e1
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Dietary interventions are effective in management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), although responses vary. We investigated whether fecal levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associate with response to dietary interventions in patients with IBS. METHODS Adults who fulfilled the Rome III criteria for IBS were recruited to a 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomly assigned to a group counselled to follow a diet low in fructans, galacto-oligosaccharides, lactose, fructose, and polyols (low-FODMAP diet, n = 46) or a group that received placebo dietary advice (sham diet, n = 47) for 4 weeks. Patients from each group were also given either a multi-strain probiotic or placebo supplement. Response was defined as a reduction of 50 points or more on the validated IBS symptom scoring system. Fecal samples were collected from participants at baseline and end of the 4-week study period; VOCs were analyzed by a gas-chromatography sensor device. VOC profiles were determined using a pipeline involving wavelet transformation followed by feature selection based on random forest. A partial least squares classifier was constructed to classify VOC profiles by response and accuracies were determined using 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS Data from 93 patients who completed the study (63 female) were used in the final analysis. More patients responded to the low-FODMAP diet (37/46, 80%) than the sham diet (21/47, 45%) (P < .001), but there was no difference in response between patients given the probiotic (31/49, 63%) vs the placebo (27/44, 61%) (P = .850), with no interaction between the diet and supplement interventions. At baseline, VOC profiles contained 15 features that classified response to the low-FODMAP diet with a mean accuracy of 97% (95% CI, 96%-99%) and 10 features that classified response to probiotic with a mean accuracy of 89% (95% CI, 86%-92%). End of treatment models achieved similar predictive powers and accuracies. CONCLUSION Fecal VOC profiling is a low cost, non-invasive tool that might be used to predict responses of patients with IBS to low-FODMAP diet and probiotics and identify their mechanisms of action. ISRCTN registry no: 02275221.
-
4.
Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota - effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies.
Panek, M, Čipčić Paljetak, H, Barešić, A, Perić, M, Matijašić, M, Lojkić, I, Vranešić Bender, D, Krznarić, Ž, Verbanac, D
Scientific reports. 2018;(1):5143
Abstract
The information on microbiota composition in the human gastrointestinal tract predominantly originates from the analyses of human faeces by application of next generation sequencing (NGS). However, the detected composition of the faecal bacterial community can be affected by various factors including experimental design and procedures. This study evaluated the performance of different protocols for collection and storage of faecal samples (native and OMNIgene.GUT system) and bacterial DNA extraction (MP Biomedicals, QIAGEN and MO BIO kits), using two NGS platforms for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Ilumina MiSeq and Ion Torrent PGM). OMNIgene.GUT proved as a reliable and convenient system for collection and storage of faecal samples although favouring Sutterella genus. MP provided superior DNA yield and quality, MO BIO depleted Gram positive organisms while using QIAGEN with OMNIgene.GUT resulted in greatest variability compared to other two kits. MiSeq and IT platforms in their supplier recommended setups provided comparable reproducibility of donor faecal microbiota. The differences included higher diversity observed with MiSeq and increased capacity of MiSeq to detect Akkermansia muciniphila, [Odoribacteraceae], Erysipelotrichaceae and Ruminococcaceae (primarily Faecalibacterium prausnitzii). The results of our study could assist the investigators using NGS technologies to make informed decisions on appropriate tools for their experimental pipelines.
-
5.
Probiotics in cystic fibrosis patients: A double blind crossover placebo controlled study: Pilot study from the ESPGHAN Working Group on Pancreas/CF.
Van Biervliet, S, Hauser, B, Verhulst, S, Stepman, H, Delanghe, J, Warzee, JP, Pot, B, Vandewiele, T, Wilschanski, M
Clinical nutrition ESPEN. 2018;:59-65
Abstract
BACKGROUND A potential positive effect of probiotics in cystic fibrosis (CF) on fecal calprotectin (FCP), pulmonary exacerbations and weight has been described in small controlled trials. METHODS A double-blind multicenter cross-over study (2 × 4 m) was performed looking at abdominal pain, nutritional status, pulmonary function, pulmonary exacerbation, FCP and lactulose/mannitol gut permeability test. Patients kept a diary with daily scoring of abdominal pain, stool frequency and consistency as well as treatment changes. RESULTS 31 CF patients entered the study of which 25 finished it. At start patients aged 9.3yrs (6.9-12.2), had a median BMI z-score of -0.5 (-1.5-0.08), height z-score of -0.4 (-1.1-0.05) and FEV1% of 100% (87.2-106.6). Median FCP at start was 61 μg/g (17-108) and gut permeability 0.079 (0.051-0.122). No significant changes were observed in the clinical parameters (BMI, FEV1%, abdominal pain, exacerbations). Despite being frequently abnormal (17/28 (61%) >50 mg/kg), FCP did not change significantly with probiotics. The proportion of patients with normal permeability was 8% during placebo and 32% during probiotic treatment (p = 0.031). FCP correlated to BMI z-score (p = 0.043) and gut permeability to abdominal pain (p = 0.015). The microbiome revealed a high predominance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteriae. Probiotic supplementation did not result in a shift at the phylum nor at phylogenetic level. CONCLUSION Normalization of gut permeability was observed in 13% of patients during probiotic treatment. However, none of the previously described effects could be confirmed.
-
6.
Fecal calprotectin: beyond intestinal organic diseases.
Caviglia, GP, Ribaldone, DG, Rosso, C, Saracco, GM, Astegiano, M, Pellicano, R
Panminerva medica. 2018;(1):29-34
Abstract
Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a calcium-binding protein with antimicrobic, imunomodulatory and antiproliferative properties that is mainly found in the cytoplasm of neutrophil granulocytes. During the last decades, FC became an increasingly useful tool both for gastroenterologists and for general practitioners for distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from irritable bowel syndrome. FC correlates with clinical scoring systems and endoscopic lesions in IBD and is considered a reliable biomarker for the prediction of clinical relapse or remission. However, FC elevation could be observed also in other gastrointestinal pathological conditions including infective colitis, microscopic colitis, eosinophilic colitis, adenomas and colorectal cancer. In addition, there are several non-pathological conditions that can lead to altered FC values. In this review, we aimed to point out individual, environmental and method-related factors that can affect FC measurement and thus its clinical interpretation.
-
7.
Fecal calprotectin is not a clinically useful marker for the prediction of the early nonresponse to exclusive enteral nutrition in pediatric patients with Crohn disease.
Copova, I, Hradsky, O, Zarubova, K, Gonsorcikova, L, Potuznikova, K, Lerchova, T, Nevoral, J, Bronsky, J
European journal of pediatrics. 2018;(11):1685-1693
Abstract
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has been recommended as the first-line therapy in children with active Crohn disease (CD). The primary aim of our study was to determine whether it is possible to use the difference between basal fecal calprotectin (F-CPT) and the value at week 2 of EEN to predict clinical response at week 6. We prospectively collected stool samples for F-CPT analysis and clinical and laboratory parameters during EEN from 38 pediatric patients (28 boys, median age 12.8 years) with newly diagnosed active luminal CD. The difference between F-CPT concentrations before EEN and at week 2 did not predict clinical non-response at week 6 (OR 0.9996 95% CI 0.9989-1.0002, p = 0.18); however, it predicted patients who did not achieve clinical remission at week 6 (OR 0.9993, 95% CI 00.9985-0.9998, p = 0.006) with sensitivity of 58%, and specificity of 92% for cut-off of F-CPT increase by 486 μg/g.Conclusions: An early decrease in F-CPT levels in children with newly diagnosed active luminal CD did not predict clinical response at week 6 of EEN induction therapy, and clinical remission was predicted with low accuracy. Therefore, F-CPT cannot be used as a predictor to select the patients in whom EEN should be terminated. What is Known: • The fecal calprotectin (F-CPT) is an important marker of intestinal inflammation. • Approximately 25% of pediatric patients with Crohn disease (CD) do not achieve clinical remission, and there is still no sufficient predictor of response to exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) treatment. What is New: • The difference between the F-CPT concentrations before EEN treatment and at week 2 did not predict clinical response to treatment at week 6, even if it predicted clinical remission, however, with low accuracy. F-CPT is not a suitable predictor to select the patients for discontinuing of EEN induction therapy.
-
8.
Does saline enema during the first stage of labour reduce the incidence of Clostridium difficile colonization in neonates? A randomized controlled trial.
Nada, AM, Mohsen, RA, Hassan, YM, Sabry, A, Soliman, NS
The Journal of hospital infection. 2018;(3):356-359
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal rectal enemas may reduce neonatal bacterial exposure during labour, which may reduce the risk of neonatal colonization with Clostridium difficile. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a saline enema during the first stage of labour in reducing neonatal colonization with C. difficile. METHODS This study was conducted at Cairo University Hospital, Egypt from January 2016 to July 2016. Asymptomatic mothers with uncomplicated vaginal delivery and their neonates without diarrhoea were included. The study group underwent saline enema, and the control group had no intervention. Stool samples were collected from neonates one week after delivery. The primary outcome was the detection of C. difficile in stool culture and direct detection of C. difficile Toxin A and Toxin B by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. FINDINGS The two groups were comparable (P>0.05) in terms of age, gravidity, parity, body mass index and gestational age. C. difficile was detected in 13.54% and 37.63% of stool cultures from the enema group and the control group, respectively (P<0.001). Direct detection of Toxins A and B was positive in 22.92% of cases in the enema group and 53.76% of cases in the control group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION This study suggests that a saline enema for the mother during the first stage of labour may be useful in reducing the risk of neonatal gut colonization by C. difficile.
-
9.
Pepper mild mottle virus: A plant pathogen with a greater purpose in (waste)water treatment development and public health management.
Symonds, EM, Nguyen, KH, Harwood, VJ, Breitbart, M
Water research. 2018;:1-12
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
An enteric virus surrogate and reliable domestic wastewater tracer is needed to manage microbial quality of food and water as (waste)water reuse becomes more prevalent in response to population growth, urbanization, and climate change. Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), a plant pathogen found at high concentrations in domestic wastewater, is a promising surrogate for enteric viruses that has been incorporated into over 29 water- and food-related microbial quality and technology investigations around the world. This review consolidates the available literature from across disciplines to provide guidance on the utility of PMMoV as either an enteric virus surrogate and/or domestic wastewater marker in various situations. Synthesis of the available research supports PMMoV as a useful enteric virus process indicator since its high concentrations in source water allow for identifying the extent of virus log-reductions in field, pilot, and full-scale (waste)water treatment systems. PMMoV reduction levels during many forms of wastewater treatment were less than or equal to the reduction of other viruses, suggesting this virus can serve as an enteric virus surrogate when evaluating new treatment technologies. PMMoV excels as an index virus for enteric viruses in environmental waters exposed to untreated domestic wastewater because it was detected more frequently and in higher concentrations than other human viruses in groundwater (72.2%) and surface waters (freshwater, 94.5% and coastal, 72.2%), with pathogen co-detection rates as high as 72.3%. Additionally, PMMoV is an important microbial source tracking marker, most appropriately associated with untreated domestic wastewater, where its pooled-specificity is 90% and pooled-sensitivity is 100%, as opposed to human feces where its pooled-sensitivity is only 11.3%. A limited number of studies have also suggested that PMMoV may be a useful index virus for enteric viruses in monitoring the microbial quality of fresh produce and shellfish, but further research is needed on these topics. Finally, future work is needed to fill in knowledge gaps regarding PMMoV's global specificity and sensitivity.
-
10.
Multivariate modelling of faecal bacterial profiles of patients with IBS predicts responsiveness to a diet low in FODMAPs.
Bennet, SMP, Böhn, L, Störsrud, S, Liljebo, T, Collin, L, Lindfors, P, Törnblom, H, Öhman, L, Simrén, M
Gut. 2018;(5):872-881
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The effects of dietary interventions on gut bacteria are ambiguous. Following a previous intervention study, we aimed to determine how differing diets impact gut bacteria and if bacterial profiles predict intervention response. DESIGN Sixty-seven patients with IBS were randomised to traditional IBS (n=34) or low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) (n=33) diets for 4 weeks. Food intake was recorded for 4 days during screening and intervention. Faecal samples and IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) reports were collected before (baseline) and after intervention. A faecal microbiota dysbiosis test (GA-map Dysbiosis Test) evaluated bacterial composition. Per protocol analysis was performed on 61 patients from whom microbiome data were available. RESULTS Responders (reduced IBS-SSS by ≥50) to low FODMAP, but not traditional, dietary intervention were discriminated from non-responders before and after intervention based on faecal bacterial profiles. Bacterial abundance tended to be higher in non-responders to a low FODMAP diet compared with responders before and after intervention. A low FODMAP intervention was associated with an increase in Dysbiosis Index (DI) scores in 42% of patients; while decreased DI scores were recorded in 33% of patients following a traditional IBS diet. Non-responders to a low FODMAP diet, but not a traditional IBS diet had higher DI scores than responders at baseline. Finally, while a traditional IBS diet was not associated with significant reduction of investigated bacteria, a low FODMAP diet was associated with reduced Bifidobacterium and Actinobacteria in patients, correlating with lactose consumption. CONCLUSIONS A low FODMAP, but not a traditional IBS diet may have significant impact on faecal bacteria. Responsiveness to a low FODMAP diet intervention may be predicted by faecal bacterial profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02107625.