-
1.
Long-term effects of low calcium dialysates on the serum calcium levels during maintenance hemodialysis treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yoshikawa, M, Takase, O, Tsujimura, T, Sano, E, Hayashi, M, Takato, T, Hishikawa, K
Scientific reports. 2018;(1):5310
Abstract
Hypercalcemia and hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) can cause the progression of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and mineral bone disorders (MBD). The KDIGO recommends the dialysates with a calcium (Ca) concentration of 1.25-1.5 mmol/L for MHD treatments, but the optimal concentration remains controversial. Here, we conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials examining a total of 622 patients to investigate the optimal concentration for MHD for 6 months or longer. The dialysates with a low Ca concentration (1.125 or 1.25 mmol/L) significantly lowered the serum Ca and raised the intact parathyroid hormone levels by 0.52 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.85) and 39.59 pg/mL (14.80-64.38), respectively, compared with a high Ca concentration (1.50 or 1.75 mmol/L). Three studies showed that a low concentration was preferred for lowering arterial calcifications or atherosclerosis in different arteries, but one study showed that coronary arterial calcifications increased with a low concentration. Two studies showed contradictory outcomes in terms of MBD. Our meta-analysis showed that a dialysate with a low Ca concentration lowered the serum Ca levels in patients receiving long-term MHD, but further studies are needed to determine the optimal Ca concentration in terms of CVD and MBD.
-
2.
Longer-Period Effects of Bicarbonate/Lactate-Buffered Neutral Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid in Patients Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis.
Hoshino, T, Kaneko, S, Minato, S, Yanai, K, Mutsuyoshi, Y, Ishii, H, Kitano, T, Shindo, M, Miyazawa, H, Aomatsu, A, et al
Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2018;(6):641-648
Abstract
High concentrations of lactate are considered to contribute to impairment of the peritoneal membrane. We investigated the longer-period effects of bicarbonate/lactate-buffered neutral peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) in patients undergoing PD for about 2 years. Patients undergoing PD were changed from a lactate-buffered neutral PDF to a bicarbonate/lactate-buffered neutral PDF. We then investigated the patients' clinical outcomes and peritoneal membrane functions as well as the surrogate markers in the drained dialysate. Fourteen patients undergoing PD were enrolled. Peritonitis was observed in one patient. No other adverse events were observed. Peritoneal function did not change as the ultrafiltration volume decreased. Fibrin degradation products and vascular endothelial growth factor in the drained dialysate decreased while the interleukin level increased. These results suggest that bicarbonate/lactate-buffered neutral PDF may have beneficial effects in terms of peritoneal preservation and can be safely used in patients undergoing PD.
-
3.
Serum-to-dialysate potassium gradient and its association with short-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients.
Brunelli, SM, Spiegel, DM, Du Mond, C, Oestreicher, N, Winkelmayer, WC, Kovesdy, CP
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2018;(7):1207-1214
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND A high serum-to-dialysate potassium (K+) gradient at the start of dialysis leads to rapid lowering of serum K+ and may confer a greater risk of adverse events. Here, we examined the near-term association of K+ gradient with clinical outcomes. METHODS This retrospective (2010-11) event-based study considered 830 741 patient-intervals, each defined by a pre-dialysis measurement of serum K+ made among adult Medicare Parts A and B enrollees who received in-center hemodialysis on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday schedule at a large US dialysis organization. K+ gradient was considered based on the difference in K+ concentration (serum-dialysate) on the date of measurement; analyses accounted for multiple observations per patient. Outcomes considered were: all-cause and cardiovascular hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits and deaths. RESULTS Higher K+ gradient was associated with younger age, greater fistula use, lower comorbidity scores and better nutritional indices. Adjusting for patient differences, there was a dose-response relationship between higher K+ gradient and greater risks of all-cause hospitalization and ED visit. A similar trend was seen for cardiovascular hospitalization but did not achieve statistical significance. No associations were observed with mortality, potentially due to a low number of events. CONCLUSIONS Higher K+ gradient is independently associated with greater risk of all-cause hospitalizations and ED visits. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions that reduce the K+ gradient ameliorate this risk.
-
4.
Haemodialysis with Tinzaparin Versus Dialysate Citrate as Anticoagulation.
Mahmood, D, Stegmayr, BG
Blood purification. 2018;(3):257-263
Abstract
Anticoagulation with citrate-containing haemodialysate (cHD) is an alternative to tinzaparin haemodialysate (tHD). The study investigated whether cHD would differ when changed from tHD. The same 18 patients were their own controls followed up with cHD for 5 months. LDL-cholesterol decreased at the end of a cHD session (p = 0.01). Neutrophils (p = 0.013) and monocytes (p = 0.007) dropped more during a cHD session. During the follow-up period of cHD, approximately 50% needed additional tinzaparin. Before the cHD session could start, there was a lower total cholesterol at 2 weeks (p = 0.014) and LDL-cholesterol at 1 month (p = 0.011) versus an increase of LDL at 5 months (p = 0.02). Only patients without additional tinzaparin had a reduction of -C-reactive protein (CRP) at 2 months of cHD (p < 0.05) but not later. Solely cHD seems possible only in half of the patients. A greater reduction in granulocytes and monocytes during cHD indicates a more extensive blood membrane interaction, while CRP may be lower.
-
5.
Vitamin and trace element deficiencies in the pediatric dialysis patient.
Harshman, LA, Lee-Son, K, Jetton, JG
Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany). 2018;(7):1133-1143
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Pediatric dialysis patients are at risk of nutritional illness secondary to deficiencies in water-soluble vitamins and trace elements. Unlike 25-OH vitamin D, most other vitamins and trace elements are not routinely monitored in the blood and, consequently, the detection of any deficiency may not occur until significant complications develop. Causes of vitamin and trace element deficiency in patients on maintenance dialysis patient are multifactorial, ranging from diminished nutritional intake to altered metabolism as well as dialysate-driven losses of water-soluble vitamins and select trace elements. In this review we summarize the nutritional sources of key water-soluble vitamins and trace elements with a focus on the biological roles and clinical manifestations of their respective deficiency to augment awareness of potential nutritional illness in pediatric patients receiving maintenance dialysis. The limited pediatric data on the topic of clearance of water-soluble vitamins and trace elements by individual dialysis modality are reviewed, including a brief discussion on clearance of water-soluble vitamins and trace elements with continuous renal replacement therapy.
-
6.
Prevention of hypophosphatemia during continuous renal replacement therapy-An overlooked problem.
Heung, M, Mueller, BA
Seminars in dialysis. 2018;(3):213-218
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Hypophosphatemia is a common and potentially serious complication occurring during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Phosphate supplementation is required in the vast majority of patients undergoing CRRT, particularly beyond the first 48 hours. Supplementation can be provided either as a standalone oral or parenteral treatment or as an additive to CRRT solutions. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages, and clinicians must weigh the individual factors most relevant in their practice setting. Currently there are no consensus protocols for phosphate replacement in CRRT, and many centers replete phosphate in response to hypophosphatemia as opposed to pre-emptively. Repletion protocols have also been challenged in recent years by shortages in injectable phosphate solutions. More recently a commercially available phosphate-containing CRRT solution was approved in the United States, but there has been limited clinical experience with this product. In this review, we present recommendations for phosphate repletion in CRRT to prevent hypophosphatemia, and describe our experience using phosphate-containing CRRT solutions.
-
7.
Initiation of peritoneal dialysis in the first weeks after catheter insertion: A comparison of a neutral-pH, low-GDP PD fluid and a conventional PD fluid
.
Farhat, K, van Ittersum, FJ, Ter Wee, PM, Paauw, NJ, Beelen, RHJ, Douma, CE
Clinical nephrology. 2018;(2):75-82
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic exposure to peritoneal dialysis (PD) fluid is associated with development of functional and structural alterations of the peritoneal membrane. The exact time point at which these changes actually occur is not known. Whether changes to the peritoneum occur immediately after installation of PD fluids and whether there is a difference between neutral-pH, low glucose degradation product (low-GDP) PD fluids and conventional PD fluids is not known either. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed an observational study. Markers related to inflammation, fibrosis, mesothelial activation, and cytokines/growth factors were measured in effluents immediately after PD-catheter insertion and during the first days and weeks of PD treatment in patients using either dianeal® or physioneal®. RESULTS Peritoneal response was observed instantly upon insertion of the PD catheter and instillation of PD fluids and persisted during daily PD therapy. Particularly during the first contacts of the peritoneum with PD fluids, high levels of cytokines and biomarkers were observed. In general, CA125 is slightly higher with dianeal. There is no difference between the fluids in hyaluronic acid (HA), IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, VEGF, and TGFβ-1 levels. CONCLUSION Implantation of the Tenckhoff catheter and installation of PD fluids induce inflammation, which in the first days resembles an acute inflammatory response. More continuous infusion of PD fluids further enhances peritoneal inflammation. The use of the bicarbonate/lactate-buffered, neutral-pH, low-GDP PD fluid physioneal exerts lower CA125 levels, lower D/P4 creatinine, but similar inflammatory response compared to conventional dianeal PD fluids in this early stage of PD therapy.
.
-
8.
Feeding during dialysis-risks and uncertainties.
Agarwal, R, Georgianos, P
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2018;(6):917-922
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Allowing dialysis patients to eat during the treatment is controversial. It is, therefore, no surprise that practices and policies with respect to intradialytic food consumption vary considerably from unit to unit and from country to country. Those who defend the position of feeding during dialysis reason that intradialytic meals offer a supervised and effective therapy for protein-energy wasting. Those who take the opposite view argue that intradialytic food intake should be avoided for the following three reasons. First, interventional studies show that eating during dialysis causes a clinically significant reduction in systemic blood pressure during the postprandial period and elevates the risk of symptomatic intradialytic hypotension; the latter is associated with increased mortality risk. Second, clinical studies have shown that eating during dialysis interferes with the adequacy of the delivered dialysis, whereas eating 2-3 h before the dialysis session has no impact on the efficiency of the subsequent dialysis treatment. And third, randomized studies show that eating during dialysis focus on the positive outcomes but do not adequately balance this potential benefit against the risk of intradialytic hemodynamic instability and poor quality of delivered dialysis. Even after half a century of providing long-term dialysis, definitive randomized trials that balance risks and benefits of eating during dialysis are missing. These knowledge gaps require randomized trials. Since there is a real possibility of harm with eating during dialysis, we caution that instead of encouraging the widespread use of intradialytic meals, practices and policies should focus on adequate nutrient intake during the interdialytic interval.
-
9.
Dialysate bicarbonate variation in maintenance hemodiafiltration patients: Impact on serum bicarbonate, intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain.
Viegas, M, Cândido, C, Felgueiras, J, Clemente, J, Barros, S, Farbota, R, Vera, F, Matos, A, Sousa, F
Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis. 2017;(3):385-392
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The dialysate bicarbonate (DB) influences the acid-base balance in dialysis patients. Very low and high serum bicarbonate (SB) have been related with a higher mortality. Acid-base balance also has been associated with hemodynamic effects in these patients. The trial aim was to compare the effect of DB concentration variation on SB levels in maintenance hemodiafiltration (HDF) patients and the effect on intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain. METHODS A prospective study, with 9 months of follow-up, involving 93 patients, divided in two groups: group 1 and group 2 with a DB of 34 mmol/L and 30 mmol/L, respectively, with monitoring of pre and post HDF SB, intradialytic hypotension, and interdialytic weight gain. FINDINGS Pre dialysis SB was higher in group 1: median concentration of 22.7 mmol/L vs. 21.1 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Post dialysis SB levels were higher in group 1: median concentration of 28.0 mmol/L vs. 25.3 mmol/L (P < 0.001). Post dialysis SB in alkalotic range was only detected in group 1 (51.2% of the patients). No significant differences were detected in intradialytic hypotension rate [28.0 vs. 27.4 episodes per 1000 sessions in group 1 and 2, respectively, (P = 0.906)] or in average interdialytic weight gain [2.9% vs. 3.0% in group 1 and 2, respectively, (P = 0.710)]. DISCUSSION DB of 30 mmol/L appears to be associated with SB levels closer to physiological levels than 34 mmol/L. The bicarbonate dialysate, in the tested concentrations, did not appear to have a significant impact on intradialytic hypotension and interdialytic weight gain in maintenance HDF patients.
-
10.
Impact of using two dialyzers in parallel on phosphate clearance in hemodialysis patients: a randomized trial.
Thompson, S, Manns, B, Lloyd, A, Hemmelgarn, B, MacRae, J, Klarenbach, S, Unsworth, L, Courtney, M, Tonelli, M
Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. 2017;(5):855-861
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dietary restriction and phosphate binders are the main interventions used to manage hyperphosphatemia in people on hemodialysis, but have limited efficacy. Modifying conventional dialysis regimens to enhance phosphate clearance as an alternative approach remains relatively unstudied. METHODS This was a 10-week, 2-arm, randomized crossover study. Participants were prevalent dialysis patients ( n = 32) with consecutive serum phosphate levels >1.6 mmol/L and on stable doses of a phosphate binder. Following a 2-week run-in period, participants were randomized to initiate dialysis using two high flux dialyzers in parallel (blood flow ≥350 mL/min, dialysate flow 800 mL/min) or standard dialysis using one high flux dialyzer (blood flow ≥350 mL/min, dialysate flow of 800 mL/min). Each regimen was 3 weeks in duration. After a 2-week washout period, participants received the alternate regimen. The primary outcome was the mean difference in phosphate clearance by dialyzer strategy. Secondary outcomes were phosphate removal and pre-dialysis serum phosphate. RESULTS Phosphate clearance for the double dialyzer strategy did not differ significantly from the single dialyzer strategy [mean difference 7.5 mL/min (95% confidence interval, 95% CI, -6.1, 21.0), P = 0.28]. There was no difference in total phosphate removal and pre-dialysis phosphate between the double and single dialyzer strategies [total phosphate removal mean difference -0.2 mmol (95% CI -4.1, 3.7), P = 0.93; pre-dialysis mean difference 0.01 mmol/L (95% CI -0.18, 0.21), P = 0.88]. There was no difference in the proportion of participants who experienced at least one episode of intradialytic hypotension (32 versus 47%, P = 0.13). A limitation of the study was frequent protocol deviations in the dialysis prescription. CONCLUSIONS In this study, the use of two dialyzers in parallel did not increase phosphate clearance, phosphate removal or pre-dialysis serum phosphorus when compared with a standard dialysis treatment strategy. Future studies should continue to evaluate novel methods of phosphate removal using conventional hemodialysis.