-
1.
The Effect of Food or Omeprazole on the Pharmacokinetics of Osimertinib in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and in Healthy Volunteers.
Vishwanathan, K, Dickinson, PA, Bui, K, Cassier, PA, Greystoke, A, Lisbon, E, Moreno, V, So, K, Thomas, K, Weilert, D, et al
Journal of clinical pharmacology. 2018;(4):474-484
Abstract
Two phase 1, open-label studies assessed the impact of food or gastric pH modification (omeprazole) on the exposure and safety/tolerability of osimertinib and its metabolites. The food effect study was an open-label, 2-period crossover study in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, randomized into 2 treatment sequences: single-dose osimertinib 80 mg in a fed then fasted state or fasted then fed. The gastric pH study was an open-label, 2-period fixed sequence study assessing the effect of omeprazole on osimertinib exposure in healthy male volunteers. In period 1, volunteers received omeprazole 40 mg (days 1-4), then omeprazole 40 mg plus osimertinib 80 mg (day 5). In period 2, volunteers received osimertinib 80 mg alone (single dose). Blood samples were collected at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic analyses. Safety/tolerability was also assessed. In the food effect study 38 patients were randomized to fed/fasted (n = 18) or fasted/fed (n = 20) sequences with all patients completing treatment. Coadministration with food did not affect osimertinib exposure (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% confidence intervals]: 106.05% [94.82%, 118.60%] [area under the plasma concentration time curve from zero to 72 hours] and 92.75% [81.40%, 105.68%] [maximum plasma concentration]). In the gastric pH study (n = 68 received treatment, n = 47 completed the study), coadministration with omeprazole did not affect osimertinib exposure (geometric least-squares mean ratios 106.66% [100.26%, 113.46%] [area under the concentration-time curve], 101.65% [94.65%, 109.16%] [peak concentration]). Osimertinib was well tolerated in both studies. Osimertinib may be administered without regard to food. Dose restriction is not required in patients whose gastric pH may be altered by concomitant agents or medical conditions. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02224053, NCT02163733.
-
2.
Clinical factors associated with early progression and grade 3-4 toxicity in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancers treated with nivolumab.
Dumenil, C, Massiani, MA, Dumoulin, J, Giraud, V, Labrune, S, Chinet, T, Giroux Leprieur, E
PloS one. 2018;(4):e0195945
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prognosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been improved by development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as nivolumab for second-line treatment. As phase III trials include only selected patients, we here investigated the clinical factors associated with efficacy and safety of nivolumab in 'real life' patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS Clinical and histological characteristics, therapies and survival data of all consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC included prospectively and treated by nivolumab in two French academic hospitals between February 2015 and December 2016 were examined. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were included, mostly male (69%), current or former smokers (87%) with PS <2 (73%). Median age was 68.5 years and 42% were aged ≥70 years. According to uni- and multi-variate analyses, only PS 2 (OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.99, p = 0.049) and number of previous treatment lines (OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.13-0.85, p = 0.022) were significantly negatively associated with tumor control. Worse progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly associated with PS 2 (HR = 5.17, 95% CI 1.99-13.43, p = 0.001) and use of steroids (HR = 3.27, 95% CI 1.39-7.69, p = 0.006). Worse overall survival was associated with symptomatic brain metastasis (HR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.23-8.85, p = 0.029). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 47 patients (70%), symptomatic brain metastasis being significantly associated with Grade ≥3 toxicity (OR = 8.13, 95% CI 1.21-55.56, p = 0.031). Age and nutritional status were not associated with response, PFS, OS or toxicity. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that nivolumab is not beneficial or safe for patients with PS 2 and symptomatic brain metastases.
-
3.
Oral Metronomic Vinorelbine (OMV) in elderly or pretreated patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer: outcome and pharmacokinetics in the real world.
Pasini, F, Barile, C, Caruso, D, Modena, Y, Fraccon, AP, Bertolaso, L, Menon, D, La Russa, F, Crepaldi, G, Bononi, A, et al
Investigational new drugs. 2018;(5):927-932
Abstract
Background Oral metronomic therapy (OMV) is particularly suitable for palliative care, and schedules adapted for unfit patients are advisable. This study investigated the effects of oral vinorelbine given every other day without interruption and its pharmacokinetic profile in patients with advanced lung cancer. Materials and Methods Ninety-two patients received OMV at doses of 20, 30 or 50 mg. Toxic events, clinical benefit and overall survival were analysed. Blood pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 82 patients. Results Median treatment duration and overall survival were 15 (range 1.3-144) and 32.3 weeks, respectively; fourty-eight (60%) patients experienced clinical benefit. Outcomes were unrelated to previous therapies, age, histology or comorbidities. Toxicity was associated with higher blood concentrations of the drug. Pharmacokinetics were stable for up to two years, and were not influenced by treatment line or age. Conclusions OMV produced non-negligible survival in patients and also showed stable long-term blood concentrations. The schedule of 20-30 mg every other day without interruption gave good tolerability and clinical benefit.
-
4.
Randomized Phase II Study Comparing Mannitol with Furosemide for the Prevention of Renal Toxicity Induced by Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy with Short-term Low-volume Hydration in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: The OLCSG1406 Study Protocol.
Makimoto, G, Ichihara, E, Hotta, K, Ninomiya, K, Oze, I, Minami, D, Ninomiya, T, Kubo, T, Ohashi, K, Tabata, M, et al
Acta medica Okayama. 2018;(3):319-323
Abstract
Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy shows a survival advantage compared to carboplatin for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer, high-volume hydration and a long infusion time are necessary to avoid nephrotoxicity, and cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been difficult to administer in outpatient settings. A low-volume hydration method using mannitol or furosemide as forced diuresis was recently introduced, but there are no clear conclusions regarding which agent should be used. We describe our ongoing randomized phase II trial (the OLCSG1406 Study) evaluating the efficacy of forced diuresis. This study will clarify whether mannitol or furosemide is more suitable in cisplatin-based chemotherapy with low-volume hydration.
-
5.
A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of BTH1677 in combination with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Engel-Riedel, W, Lowe, J, Mattson, P, Richard Trout, J, Huhn, RD, Gargano, M, Patchen, ML, Walsh, R, Trinh, MM, Dupuis, M, et al
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer. 2018;(1):16
Abstract
BACKGROUND BTH1677, a beta-glucan pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecule, drives an anti-cancer immune response in combination with oncology antibody therapies. This phase II study explored the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of BTH1677 combined with bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS Patients were randomized to the BTH1677 arm (N = 61; intravenous [IV] BTH1677, 4 mg/kg, weekly; IV bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, once each 3-week cycle [Q3W]; IV carboplatin, 6 mg/mL/min Calvert formula area-under-the-curve, Q3W; and IV paclitaxel, 200 mg/m2, Q3W) or Control arm (N = 31; bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel as above). Carboplatin/paclitaxel was discontinued after 4-6 cycles and patients who responded or remained stable received maintenance therapy with BTH1677/bevacizumab (BTH1677 arm) or bevacizumab (Control arm). Efficacy assessments, based on blinded central radiology review, included objective response rate (ORR; primary endpoint), disease control rate, duration of objective response, and progression-free survival. Overall survival and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed. RESULTS ORR was higher in the BTH1677 vs Control arm but the difference between groups was not statistically significant (60.4% vs 43.5%; P = .2096). All other clinical endpoints also favored the BTH1677 arm but none statistically differed between arms. PK was consistent with previous studies. Although a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in the BTH1677 vs Control arm (93.2% vs 66.7%), no unexpected AEs were observed. Serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were lower in the BTH1677 vs Control arm. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in tumor assessments and survival were observed with BTH1677/bevacizumab/carboplatin/paclitaxel compared with control treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov registration ID: NCT00874107 . Registered 2 April 2009. First participant was enrolled on 29 September 2009.
-
6.
Effect of omega 3 fatty acids on C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Lu, Y, Chen, RG, Wei, SZ, Hu, HG, Sun, F, Yu, CH
Medicine. 2018;(37):e11971
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
This study investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of omega 3 fatty acids (O3FAs) for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (ANSCLC).A total of 137 patients with ANSCLC were included in this study. Of those, 77 patients underwent O3FA and were assigned to a treatment group, while 60 patients did not receive it, and were assigned to a control group. C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin (IL)-6 levels, as well as the levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were checked. In addition, nutritional status and quality of life were also evaluated. All patients in the treatment group received a total of 6 weeks treatment.After 6 weeks treatment, patients in the treatment group exerted better outcomes in CRP and IL-6, although no significant differences were found in nutritional status, as well as the quality, compared with patients in the control group.The results of this retrospective study found that O3FA may change levels of CRP and IL-6, except the nutritional status and quality of life.
-
7.
Pretreatment prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic factor in lung cancer: Review and meta-analysis.
Wang, Z, Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Zhang, T
Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2018;:303-310
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have explored the association between pretreatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and prognosis in lung cancer (LC), but the results are still inconclusive. We systematically evaluated the prognostic value of pretreatment PNI in LC patients by conducting a meta-analysis. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed by retrieving PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, Wan Fang and CNKI databases. We used hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the associations of PNI with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in LC patients. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were enrolled into this meta-analysis, with 17 about no-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 4 about on small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The results indicated that NSCLC patients with low PNI had shorter OS (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.28-1.96, P = 0.001), DFS/RFS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.08-2.80, P = 0.017), and PFS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.26-1.83, P = 0.002) than patients with high PNI. The robustness of these pooled results were verified by our stratified analysis and sensitivity analysis. Besides, a pooled analysis of 4 studies about SCLC suggested that low PNI was closely associated with worse OS in SCLC patients as well. CONCLUSION Low PNI predicts poor survival in LC patients.
-
8.
Prognostic value of pretreatment prognostic nutritional index in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hu, Y, Shen, J, Liu, R, Feng, Z, Zhang, C, Ling, L, Chen, L
The International journal of biological markers. 2018;(4):372-378
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pretreatment prognostic nutritional index has been considered a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but this remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to systematically assess the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with NSCLC. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI. The hazard ratios (HRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the link between the prognostic nutritional index and the oncological outcomes of patients with NSCLC, including overall survival, disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. RESULTS Fifteen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Twelve of these studies explored the association between the prognostic nutritional index and the overall survival of patients with NSCLC. Our pooled analysis indicated that a low prognostic nutritional index was significantly related to adverse overall survival (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.44, 1.81; P < 0.001). Our results also showed that the prognostic nutritional index was a negative predictor for disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival in patients with NSCLC. CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis demonstrated that there was a close association between the prognostic nutritional index value and prognosis in NSCLC patients and that the prognostic nutritional index may act as a useful prognostic biomarker in NSCLC patients.
-
9.
The evolving role of pemetrexed disodium for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.
Rossi, G, Alama, A, Genova, C, Rijavec, E, Tagliamento, M, Biello, F, Coco, S, Dal Bello, MG, Boccardo, S, Grossi, F
Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy. 2018;(17):1969-1976
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains one of the big cancer killers, despite the introduction of a number of approved therapeutics in recent times. Pemetrexed is a multi-target folate inhibitor, which is currently available to patients affected by advanced non-squamous NSCLC in combination with a platinum derivate in first-line therapy and as a single agent in second-line therapy. Areas covered: This review covers presents the use pemetrexed in the management of NSCLC by exploring the data available from clinical trials and meta-analyses. Data from a phase III trial confirmed its role in the first-line setting in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Furthermore, data suggested a role for pemetrexed in local and advanced NSCLC. Expert opinion: To date, in spite of the introduction of novel anti-neoplastic agents, pemetrexed still represents a cornerstone in the management of non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, recently published data support its role in innovative combinations including together with chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
-
10.
Impact of physical activity on fatigue and quality of life in people with advanced lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Dhillon, HM, Bell, ML, van der Ploeg, HP, Turner, JD, Kabourakis, M, Spencer, L, Lewis, C, Hui, R, Blinman, P, Clarke, SJ, et al
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2017;(8):1889-1897
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity (PA) improves fatigue and quality of life (QOL) in cancer survivors. Our aim was to assess whether a 2-month PA intervention improves fatigue and QOL for people with advanced lung cancer. METHODS Participants with advanced lung cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) ≤2, >6 months life expectancy, and ability to complete six-min walk test, were stratified (disease stage, PS 0-1 versus 2, centre) and randomized (1:1) in an open-label study to usual care (UC) (nutrition and PA education materials) or experimental intervention (EX): UC plus 2-month supervised weekly PA and behaviour change sessions. Assessments occurred at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary endpoint was fatigue [Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) questionnaire] at 2 months. The study was designed to detect a difference in mean FACT-F subscale score of 6. Analysis was intention-to-treat using linear mixed models. RESULTS We recruited 112 patients: 56 (50.4%) were randomized to EX, 55(49.5%) to UC; 1 ineligible. Male 55%; median age 64 years (34-80); 106 (96%) non-small cell lung cancer; 106 (95.5%) stage IV. At 2, 4 and 6 months, 90, 73 and 62 participants were assessed, respectively, with no difference in attrition between groups. There were no significant differences in fatigue between the groups at 2, 4 or 6 months: mean scores at 2 months EX 37.5, UC 36.4 (difference 1.2, 95% CI - 3.5, 5.8, P = 0.62). There were no significant differences in QOL, symptoms, physical or functional status, or survival. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to the intervention was good but the intervention group did not increase their PA enough compared to the control group, and no difference was seen in fatigue or QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry No. ACTRN12609000971235.