-
1.
Efficacy of high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE qualification of available evidence.
Borovac, JA, Leth-Olsen, M, Kumric, M, D'Amario, D, Schwarz, K, Glavas, D, Bozic, J
European journal of clinical pharmacology. 2022;(1):111-126
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the impact of a high-dose statin loading before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on short-term outcomes in patients presenting with the acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS This meta-analysis was based on a search of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Journals, and SCOPUS for randomized controlled trials that compared high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with no or low-dose statin administered before planned PCI in statin-naive patients with ACS. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Prespecified subanalyses were performed with respect to statin and ACS type. RESULTS A total of eleven trials enrolling 6291 patients were included, of which 75.4% received PCI. High-dose statin loading was associated with an overall 43% relative risk (RR) reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.77) in whole ACS population. This effect was primarily driven by the 39% reduction in the occurrence of MI (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). No significant effect on all-cause mortality reduction was observed (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). In the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), atorvastatin loading was associated with a 33% reduction in MACCE (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48-0.94), while in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction ACS (NSTE-ACS), rosuvastatin loading was associated with 52% reduction in MACCE at 30 days (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34-0.66). The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE was low to high, depending on the outcome. CONCLUSION A high-dose loading of statins before PCI in patients with ACS reduces MACCE and reduces the risk of MI with no impact on mortality at 30 days. Atorvastatin reduces MACCE in STEMI while rosuvastatin reduces MACCE in NSTE-ACS at 30 days.
-
2.
Biomarker-Informed Model-Based Risk Assessment of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 1B Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.
Kimoto, E, Costales, C, West, MA, Bi, YA, Vourvahis, M, David Rodrigues, A, Varma, MVS
Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 2022;(2):404-415
Abstract
Quantitative prediction of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) involving organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP)1B1/1B3 inhibition is limited by uncertainty in the translatability of experimentally determined in vitro inhibition potency (half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 )). This study used an OATP1B endogenous biomarker-informed physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling approach to predict the effect of inhibitor drugs on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of OATP1B substrates. Initial static analysis with about 42 inhibitor drugs, using in vitro IC50 values and unbound liver inlet concentrations (Iin,max,u ), suggested in vivo OATP1B inhibition risk for drugs with R-value (1+ Iin,max,u /IC50 ) above 1.5. A full-PBPK model accounting for transporter-mediated hepatic disposition was developed for coproporphyrin I (CP-I), an endogenous OATP1B biomarker. For several inhibitors (cyclosporine, diltiazem, fenebrutinib, GDC-0810, itraconazole, probenecid, and rifampicin at 3 different doses), PBPK models were developed and verified against available CP-I plasma exposure data to obtain in vivo OATP1B inhibition potency-which tend to be lower than the experimentally measured in vitro IC50 by about 2-fold (probenecid and rifampicin) to 37-fold (GDC-0810). Models verified with CP-I data are subsequently used to predict DDIs with OATP1B probe drugs, rosuvastatin and pitavastatin. The predicted and observed area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratios are within 20% error in 55% cases, and within 30% error in 89% cases. Collectively, this comprehensive study illustrates the adequacy and utility of endogenous biomarker-informed PBPK modeling in mechanistic understanding and quantitative predictions of OATP1B-mediated DDIs in drug development.
-
3.
Atorvastatin and pravastatin stimulate nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species generation, affect mitochondrial network architecture and elevate nicotinamide N-methyltransferase level in endothelial cells.
Dymkowska, D, Wrzosek, A, Zabłocki, K
Journal of applied toxicology : JAT. 2021;(7):1076-1088
Abstract
Statins belong to the most often prescribed medications, which efficiently normalise hyperlipidaemia and prevent cardiovascular complications in obese and diabetic patients. However, beside expected therapeutic results based on the inhibition of 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, these drugs exert multiple side effects of poorly understood characteristic. In this study, side effects of pravastatin and atorvastatin on EA.hy926 endothelial cell line were investigated. It was found that both statins activate proinflammatory response, elevate nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and stimulate antioxidative response in these cells. Moreover, only slight stimulation of the mitochondrial biogenesis and significant changes in the mitochondrial network organisation have been noted. Although biochemical bases behind these effects are not clear, they may partially be explained as an elevation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity and an increased activating phosphorylation of sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), which were observed in statins-treated cells. In addition, both statins increased nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT) protein level that may explain a reduced fraction of methylated histone H3. Interestingly, a substantial reduction of the total level of histone H3 in cells treated with pravastatin but not atorvastatin was also observed. These results indicate a potential additional biochemical target for statins related to reduced histone H3 methylation due to increased NNMT protein level. Thus, NNMT may directly modify gene activity.
-
4.
The Effect of Long-Term Atorvastatin Therapy on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness of Children With Dyslipidemia.
Karapostolakis, G, Vakaki, M, Attilakos, A, Marmarinos, A, Papadaki, M, Koumanidou, C, Alexopoulou, E, Gourgiotis, D, Garoufi, A
Angiology. 2021;(4):322-331
Abstract
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) has been proposed as an early marker of subclinical atherosclerosis in high risk children. Children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia have greater cIMT than matched healthy controls or their unaffected siblings. Statin therapy may delay the progression of cIMT, although long-term studies in children are scarce. We evaluated the effect of atorvastatin treatment on cIMT in children with dyslipidemia. We studied 81 children/adolescents, 27 with severe dyslipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] ≥190 mg/dL) and 54 sex- and age-matched healthy controls; LDL-C ≤ 130 mg/dL and lipoprotein (a), Lp(a), ≤30 mg/dL. In the children with dyslipidemia, cIMT was measured twice, before and on treatment (18.2 ± 7.7 months). Anthropometric data, a full lipid profile, liver, kidney, and thyroid function were evaluated. Males with dyslipidemia had a greater cIMT than male controls after adjustment for other factors (P = .049). In addition, a nonstatistically significant decrease in cIMT was observed after treatment (P = .261). Treatment with atorvastatin resulted in a significantly improved lipid profile. Females with dyslipidemia had a significantly thinner cIMT than males. Children with normal and high Lp(a) levels had similar cIMT values. In conclusion, treatment with atorvastatin had a beneficial effect on the lipid profile and cIMT progression in children with severe dyslipidemia.
-
5.
Impact of statin therapy on LDL and non-HDL cholesterol levels in subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia.
Climent, E, Marco-Benedí, V, Benaiges, D, Pintó, X, Suárez-Tembra, M, Plana, N, Lafuente, H, Ortega-Martínez de Victoria, E, Brea-Hernando, Á, Vila, À, et al
Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD. 2021;(5):1594-1603
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cardiovascular risk in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) is driven by LDL cholesterol levels. Since lipid response to statin therapy presents individual variation, this study aimed to compare mean LDL and non-HDL cholesterol reductions and their variability achieved with different types and doses of the most frequently prescribed statins. METHODS AND RESULTS Among primary hypercholesterolaemia cases on the Spanish Arteriosclerosis Society registry, 2894 with probable/definite HeFH and complete information on drug therapy and lipid profile were included. LDL cholesterol reduction ranged from 30.2 ± 17.0% with simvastatin 10 mg to 48.2 ± 14.7% with rosuvastatin 40 mg. After the addition of ezetimibe, an additional 26, 24, 21 and 24% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels was obtained for rosuvastatin, 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg, respectively. Subjects with definite HeFH and a confirmed genetic mutation had a more discrete LDL cholesterol reduction compared to definite HeFH subjects with no genetic mutation. A suboptimal response (<15% or <30% reduction in LDL cholesterol levels, respectively with low-/moderate-intensity and high-intensity statin therapy) was observed in 13.5% and, respectively, 20.3% of the subjects. CONCLUSION According to the LDL cholesterol reduction in HeFH patients, the ranking for more to less potent statins was rosuvastatin, atorvastatin and simvastatin; however, at maximum dosage, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were nearly equivalent. HeFH subjects with positive genetic diagnosis had a lower lipid-lowering response. Approximately 1 in 5 patients on high-intensity statin therapy presented a suboptimal response.
-
6.
Evaluation of efficacy and safety of combined rosuvastatin and atorvastatin in treating with coronary heart disease: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li, K, Liu, MM, Yang, X, Chen, L, Geng, H, Luo, W, Ma, J
Medicine. 2021;(24):e26340
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Globally, coronary heart disease (CHD) is a primary cause of morbidity leading to disabilities and mortality. Modern clinical practice adopts several pharmacological methods to treat CHD. Angina pectoris refers to sever chest pain due to CHD, it has a profound impact on the wellbeing of patients. Moreover, angina pectoris is a crucial prognosis predictor. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safeness of using combined rosuvastatin and atorvastatin to treat CHD patients. METHODS A systematic literature search for articles will be conducted on several electronic databases from their inception to May 2021. The search will include all randomized controlled trials examining the use of rosuvastatin in combination with atorvastatin to treat CHD patients. The databases are as follows: MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, WanFang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and EMBASE. A couple of authors will independently assess the eligibility, extract study data, and assess the possibility of bias. Moreover, depending on the type of data and heterogeneity of the included studies, either the Mantel-Haensel fixed-effect model or the DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model will be used to estimate the relative risk, mean differences, or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals. All differences in opinion shall be decided by involving an additional author in the discussion. Lastly, the RevMan software (version: 5.3) will be used to perform sensitivity analysis, data synthesis, and risk of bias assessment. RESULTS The effectiveness and security of using rosuvastatin in combination with atorvastatin to treat CHD patients will be systematically evaluated. CONCLUSION This study will provide evidence to evaluate the efficacy and security of using a combination of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin to treat CHD patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval will not be required since it is based on already published data. REGISTRATION NUMBER DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/VYBDR (https://osf.io/vybdr/).
-
7.
Forty-eight weeks of statin therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with lower extremity atherosclerotic disease: Comparison of the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on lower femoral total plaque areas.
Zhou, X, Wu, L, Chen, Y, Xiao, H, Huang, X, Li, Y, Xiao, H, Cao, X
Journal of diabetes investigation. 2021;(7):1278-1286
Abstract
AIMS/INTRODUCTION Type 2 diabetes mellitus is correlated with systemic atherosclerosis. Statin therapies have been proved to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, protecting type 2 diabetes mellitus patients from cardiovascular events. Recently, more interest has been focused on the regression of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease (LEAD) for the potential prevention of amputation. However, the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on LEAD in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients have not been directly compared. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study compared the effects of pitavastatin and atorvastatin on femoral total plaque areas (FTPA), and lipids and glucose metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with elevated LDL-C level and LEAD. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with LDL-C level >2.6 mmol/L and LEAD were randomly assigned to receive either pitavastatin 2 mg/day or atorvastatin 10 mg/day for 48 weeks. FTPA were measured at baseline and the end of the study. Levels of glucose and lipids profile were measured periodically. The efficacy was evaluated in 63 patients. RESULTS The percentage change in FTPA measurements was similar between the pitavastatin group and atorvastatin group (-17.79 ± 21.27% vs -14.34 ± 16.33%), as were the changes in LDL-C (-44.0 ± 18.0% vs -40.3 ± 18.2%) and triglyceride (17.6 ± 20.0% vs 16.2 ± 17.0%). However, the level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly higher in the pitavastatin group compared with the atorvastatin group after 48 weeks of treatment (12.9 ± 10.3% vs 7.2 ± 11.7%, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for the measurements of glucose metabolism. CONCLUSION In type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with elevated LDL-C level and LEAD, 48 weeks of treatment with either pitavastatin or atorvastatin was associated with significant regression of FTPA. Pitavastatin treatment resulted in a significantly higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level compared with atorvastatin treatment.
-
8.
Statins Are Associated With Increased Insulin Resistance and Secretion.
Abbasi, F, Lamendola, C, Harris, CS, Harris, V, Tsai, MS, Tripathi, P, Abbas, F, Reaven, GM, Reaven, PD, Snyder, MP, et al
Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2021;(11):2786-2797
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Statin treatment reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease but is associated with a modest increased risk of type 2 diabetes, especially in those with insulin resistance or prediabetes. Our objective was to determine the physiological mechanism for the increased type 2 diabetes risk. APPROACH AND RESULTS We conducted an open-label clinical trial of atorvastatin 40 mg daily in adults without known atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes at baseline. The co-primary outcomes were changes at 10 weeks versus baseline in insulin resistance as assessed by steady-state plasma glucose during the insulin suppression test and insulin secretion as assessed by insulin secretion rate area under the curve (ISRAUC) during the graded-glucose infusion test. Secondary outcomes included glucose and insulin, both fasting and during oral glucose tolerance test. Of 75 participants who enrolled, 71 completed the study (median age 61 years, 37% women, 65% non-Hispanic White, median body mass index, 27.8 kg/m2). Atorvastatin reduced LDL (low-density lipoprotein)-cholesterol (median decrease 53%, P<0.001) but did not change body weight. Compared with baseline, atorvastatin increased insulin resistance (steady-state plasma glucose) by a median of 8% (P=0.01) and insulin secretion (ISRAUC) by a median of 9% (P<0.001). There were small increases in oral glucose tolerance test glucoseAUC (median increase, 0.05%; P=0.03) and fasting insulin (median increase, 7%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS In individuals without type 2 diabetes, high-intensity atorvastatin for 10 weeks increases insulin resistance and insulin secretion. Over time, the risk of new-onset diabetes with statin use may increase in individuals who become more insulin resistant but are unable to maintain compensatory increases in insulin secretion.
-
9.
Effects of atorvastatin on the insulin resistance in women of polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen, LL, Zheng, JH
Medicine. 2021;(24):e26289
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atorvastatin treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic method for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in many clinical studies. Nonetheless, the effects of atorvastatin on insulin resistance in PCOS patients still remain controversial. OBJECTIVE The aim of this report was to evaluate the effects of atorvastatin therapy on the insulin resistance in the treatment of PCOS compared to that of placebo, in order to confer a reference for clinical practice. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of atorvastatin for PCOS published up to August, 2020 were searched. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated, and heterogeneity was measured by the I2 test. Sensitivity analysis was also carried out. The outcomes of interest were as follows: fasting glucose concentration, fasting insulin level, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) or body mass index (BMI) value. RESULTS Nine RCTs with 406 participants were included. The difference of fasting glucose concentration in PCOS patients between atorvastatin group and placebo group was not statistically significant (8 trials; SMD -0.06, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.20, P = .66). PCOS patients in atorvastatin group had lower fasting insulin level than those in placebo group (7 trials; SMD -1.84, 95% CI -3.06 to -0.62, P < .003). The homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) value showed significant decrease in the atorvastatin therapy compared to placebo (6 trials; SMD -4.12, 95% CI -6.00 to -2.23, P < .0001). In contrast to placebo, atorvastatin therapy did not decrease the BMI value significantly in PCOS patients (7 trials; SMD 0.12, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.31, P = .22). CONCLUSIONS Atorvastatin therapy can reduce insulin resistance in the treatment of patients with PCOS. In addition, further large-sample, multi-center RCTs are needed to identify these findings.
-
10.
Atorvastatin induces adrenal androgen downshift in men with prostate cancer: A post Hoc analysis of a pilot adaptive Randomised clinical trial.
Raittinen, PVH, Syvälä, H, Tammela, TLJ, Häkkinen, MR, Ilmonen, P, Auriola, S, Murtola, TJ
EBioMedicine. 2021;:103432
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) progression depends on androgen receptor activity. Cholesterol is required for biosynthesis of all steroid hormones, including androgens. Impact of cholesterol-lowering statins on androgens is unknown. We explored atorvastatin influence on serum and prostatic tissue steroidomic profiles (SP) to expose novel pathways for limiting androgen concentration in men with PCa. METHODS This is a pre-planned post hoc analysis of ESTO-1 pilot randomised, double-blinded, clinical trial. Statin naïve men, scheduled for radical prostatectomy due to localised PCa, were randomised 1:1 to use daily 80 mg of atorvastatin or placebo before the surgery for a median of 28 days. Participants were recruited and treated at the Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland. 108 of the 158 recruited men were included in the analysis based on sample availability for hormone profiling. Serum and prostatic tissue steroid profiles were determined using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Wilcoxon rank sum test and bootstrap confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyse the difference between placebo and atorvastatin arms. FINDINGS Most serum and prostatic steroids, including testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, were not associated with atorvastatin use. However, atorvastatin use induced serum SP changes in 11-ketoandrostenedione (placebo 960pM, atorvastatin 617.5pM, p-value <0.0001, median difference -342.5; 95% CI -505.23 - -188.98). In the prostatic tissue, atorvastatin was associated with plausible downshift in 11- ketodihydrotestosterone (placebo 25.0pM in 100 mg tissue/1 mL saline, atorvastatin 18.5pM in 100 mg tissue/1 mL saline, p-value 0.027, median difference -6.53; 95% CI -12.8 - -0.29); however, this association diminished after adjusting for multiple testing. No serious harms were reported. INTERPRETATION Atorvastatin was associated with adrenal androgen downshift in the serum and possibly in the prostate. The finding warrants further investigation whether atorvastatin could improve androgen deprivation therapy efficacy. FUNDING Funded by grants from the Finnish Cultural Foundation, Finnish Cancer Society, Academy of Finland, and the Expert Responsibility Area of the Tampere University Hospital. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01821404.