-
1.
Blockade of the angiotensin system improves mental health domain of quality of life: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Brownstein, DJ, Salagre, E, Köhler, C, Stubbs, B, Vian, J, Pereira, C, Chavarria, V, Karmakar, C, Turner, A, Quevedo, J, et al
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry. 2018;(1):24-38
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is unclear whether blockade of the angiotensin system has effects on mental health. Our objective was to determine the impact of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockers on mental health domain of quality of life. STUDY DESIGN Meta-analysis of published literature. DATA SOURCES PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov databases. The last search was conducted in January 2017. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials comparing any angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or AT1R blocker versus placebo or non-angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or non-AT1R blocker were selected. Study participants were adults without any major physical symptoms. We adhered to meta-analysis reporting methods as per PRISMA and the Cochrane Collaboration. DATA SYNTHESIS Eleven studies were included in the analysis. When compared with placebo or other antihypertensive medications, AT1R blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were associated with improved overall quality of life (standard mean difference = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = [0.08, 0.14], p < 0.0001), positive wellbeing (standard mean difference = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = [0.05, 0.17], p < 0.0001), mental (standard mean difference = 0.15, 95% confidence interval = [0.06, 0.25], p < 0.0001), and anxiety (standard mean difference = 0.08, 95% confidence interval = [0.01, 0.16], p < 0.0001) domains of QoL. No significant difference was found for the depression domain (standard mean difference = 0.05, 95% confidence interval = [0.02, 0.12], p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS Use of angiotensin blockers and inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension in otherwise healthy adults is associated with improved mental health domains of quality of life. Mental health quality of life was a secondary outcome in the included studies. Research specifically designed to analyse the usefulness of drugs that block the angiotensin system is necessary to properly evaluate this novel psychiatric target.
-
2.
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors vs. Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Treatment of Hypertension in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Why We Favour Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.
Mavrakanas, TA, Lipman, ML
Canadian journal of diabetes. 2018;(2):118-123
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the principal cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus. The incidence or progression of kidney disease is also common in these patients. Several clinical trials have established the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for the prevention of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes in this population and are summarized in this review article. Head-to-head comparison of angiotensin receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors has shown similar cardioprotective and renoprotective properties of both medication classes. However, angiotensin receptor blockers have an improved safety profile with fewer episodes of cough and angioedema and may be the agent of choice in patients with diabetes and hypertension. Novel therapeutic strategies, such as those that include a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker or a selective sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitor, may further protect patients with diabetes from cardiovascular and renal complications.
-
3.
Impact of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Management by Tertiles of Blood Pressure in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).
Shapiro, BP, Ambrosius, WT, Blackshear, JL, Cushman, WC, Whelton, PK, Oparil, S, Beddhu, S, Dwyer, JP, Gren, LH, Kostis, WJ, et al
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979). 2018;(6):1064-1074
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control improved outcomes in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Our objective was to expand on reported findings by analysis of baseline characteristics, primary outcomes, adverse events, follow-up blood pressure, and medication use differences by baseline SBP (tertile 1 [T1], <132; tertile 2 [T2], 132-145; and tertile 3 [T3], >145 mm Hg). Participants with higher baseline SBP tertile were more often women and older, had higher cardiovascular risk, and lower utilization of antihypertensive medications, statins, and aspirin. Achieved SBP in both treatment arms was slightly higher in T2 and T3 compared with T1 and fewer in the T3 groups achieved SBP targets compared with T1 and T2 groups. The primary composite outcome with intensive versus standard SBP treatment was reduced by 30% in T1, 23% in T2, and 17% in T3 with no evidence of an interaction (P=0.77). Event rates were lower in the intensive arm, and there was no evidence that this benefit differed by SBP tertile. There was no difference in the hazard for serious adverse events in any of the 3 tertiles. Medication utilization differed across the SBP tertiles at baseline with a lesser percentage of diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker drugs in the higher tertiles-a finding that reversed during the trial. The beneficial effects of intensive SBP lowering were not modified by the level of baseline SBP. Within the parameters of this population, these findings add support for clinicians to treat blood pressure to goal irrespective of baseline SBP.
-
4.
Effect of neprilysin inhibition on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic heart failure who are receiving target doses of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system: a secondary analysis of the PARADIGM-HF trial.
Packer, M, Claggett, B, Lefkowitz, MP, McMurray, JJV, Rouleau, JL, Solomon, SD, Zile, MR
The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology. 2018;(7):547-554
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neprilysin inhibition has favourable effects on experimental diabetic nephropathy. We sought to assess the effects of neprilysin inhibition on the course of renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In the randomised, double-blind PARADIGM-HF trial, the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (97 mg/103 mg twice daily) were compared with enalapril (10 mg twice daily) in 8399 patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure and systolic dysfunction. In this secondary intention-to-treat analysis, we assessed the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over a 44-month follow-up period in patients with (n=3784) and those without (n=4615) diabetes. PARADIGM-HF is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01035255. FINDINGS eGFR decreased by 1·1 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (95% CI 1·0-1·2) in patients without diabetes, but by 2·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year (1·9-2·1) in those with diabetes (p<0·0001). Compared with patients treated with enalapril, those treated with sacubitril/valsartan had a slower rate of decline in eGFR (-1·3 vs -1·8 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year; p<0·0001), and the magnitude of the benefit was larger in patients with versus those without diabetes (difference 0·6 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year [95% CI 0·4-0·8] in patients with vs 0·3 mL/min per 1·73 m2 per year [0·2-0·5] in those without diabetes; pinteraction=0·038). The greater effect of neprilysin inhibition in patients with diabetes could not be explained by the effects of treatment on the course of heart failure or on HbA1c. The incremental benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with diabetes was no longer apparent when changes in eGFR were adjusted for urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate (p=0·41). INTERPRETATION In patients in whom the renin-angiotensin system is already maximally blocked, the addition of neprilysin inhibition attenuates the effect of diabetes to accelerate the deterioration of renal function that occurs in patients with chronic heart failure. FUNDING Novartis.
-
5.
Add-On Antihypertensive Medications to Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.
Schroeder, EB, Chonchol, M, Shetterly, SM, Powers, JD, Adams, JL, Schmittdiel, JA, Nichols, GA, O'Connor, PJ, Steiner, JF
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN. 2018;(5):727-734
-
-
Free full text
-
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In individuals with diabetes, the comparative effectiveness of add-on antihypertensive medications added to an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker on the risk of significant kidney events is unknown. DESIGN, SETTING PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We used an observational, multicenter cohort of 21,897 individuals with diabetes to compare individuals who added β-blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, loop diuretics, or thiazide diuretics to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers. We examined the hazard of significant kidney events, cardiovascular events, and death using Cox proportional hazard models with propensity score weighting. The composite significant kidney event end point was defined as the first occurrence of a ≥30% decline in eGFR to an eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, initiation of dialysis, or kidney transplant. The composite cardiovascular event end point was defined as the first occurrence of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or congestive heart failure; coronary artery bypass grafting; or percutaneous coronary intervention, and it was only examined in those free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. RESULTS Over a maximum of 5 years, there were 4707 significant kidney events, 1498 deaths, and 818 cardiovascular events. Compared with thiazide diuretics, hazard ratios for significant kidney events for β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and loop diuretics were 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.89), 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 0.78), and 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.41), respectively. Compared with thiazide diuretics, hazard ratios of mortality for β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and loop diuretics were 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.44), 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.03), and 1.67 (95% confidence interval, 1.31 to 2.13), respectively. Compared with thiazide diuretics, hazard ratios of cardiovascular events for β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and loop diuretics compared with thiazide diuretics were 1.65 (95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 1.96), 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 1.39), and 1.55 (95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.27), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Compared with thiazide diuretics, calcium channel blockers were associated with a lower risk of significant kidney events and a similar risk of cardiovascular events.
-
6.
A randomized multicentre trial to compare revascularization with optimal medical therapy for the treatment of chronic total coronary occlusions.
Werner, GS, Martin-Yuste, V, Hildick-Smith, D, Boudou, N, Sianos, G, Gelev, V, Rumoroso, JR, Erglis, A, Christiansen, EH, Escaned, J, et al
European heart journal. 2018;(26):2484-2493
Abstract
AIMS: The clinical value of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic coronary total occlusions (CTOs) is not established by randomized trials. This study should compare the benefit of PCI vs. optimal medical therapy (OMT) on the health status in patients with at least one CTO. METHOD AND RESULTS Three hundred and ninety-six patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized, multicentre, open-label, and controlled clinical trial to compare the treatment by PCI with OMT with a 2:1 randomization ratio. The primary endpoint was the change in health status assessed by the Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) between baseline and 12 months follow-up. Fifty-two percent of patients have multi-vessel disease in whom all significant non-occlusive lesions were treated before randomization. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed including 13.4% failed procedures in the PCI group and 7.3% cross-overs in the OMT group. At 12 months, a greater improvement of SAQ subscales was observed with PCI as compared with OMT for angina frequency [5.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.75; 8.71; P = 0.003], and quality of life (6.62, 95% CI 1.78-11.46; P = 0.007), reaching the prespecified significance level of 0.01 for the primary endpoint. Physical limitation (P = 0.02) was also improved in the PCI group. Complete freedom from angina was more frequent with PCI 71.6% than OMT 57.8% (P = 0.008). There was no periprocedural death or myocardial infarction. At 12 months, major adverse cardiac events were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION Percutaneous coronary intervention leads to a significant improvement of the health status in patients with stable angina and a CTO as compared with OMT alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01760083.
-
7.
Pharmacologic Treatment of Patients With Myocardial Ischemia With No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.
Turgeon, RD, Pearson, GJ, Graham, MM
The American journal of cardiology. 2018;(7):888-895
Abstract
Half of women and 1/3 of men with angina and ischemia on stress testing have ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). These patients have quality of life (QoL) impairment comparable with patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Clinicians generally treat INOCA with traditional antianginal agents despite previous studies demonstrating variable response to these medications. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of available pharmacologic therapies for INOCA. We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in July 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating pharmacologic agents for INOCA. The primary outcome of interest was QoL. Secondary outcomes included subjective and objective efficacy measures and safety outcomes. We included 35 RCTs from 333 identified studies. Interventions that improved QoL with moderate-quality evidence included angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (±statin) and ranolazine. Low-to-very-low-quality evidence also suggests that ACE inhibitors, β blockers, calcium-channel blockers, nicorandil, ranolazine, and statins may decrease angina frequency and delay ischemia on stress testing. Other interventions, most notably nitrates, did not significantly improve any outcome. In conclusion, evidence for pharmacologic treatment of INOCA is generally poor, and higher-quality RCTs using a standardized definition of INOCA are needed. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that ACE inhibitors and ranolazine improve QoL. Other interventions had low-quality evidence or no evidence of efficacy.
-
8.
Role of ACE inhibitors in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Gupta, V, Kumar Singh, S, Agrawal, V, Bali Singh, T
Pediatric blood & cancer. 2018;(11):e27308
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several measures including drugs have been tried to reduce anthracycline cardiotoxicity. The lack of randomized trials prompted this study to assess the role of an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (enalapril) in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in children with hematological malignancies. METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted on 84 patients with leukemia (41) and lymphoma (43) who received anthracyclines (doxorubicin and/or daunorubicin) at cumulative dose ≥200 mg/m2 . The patients were randomized to receive either enalapril [group A (n = 44)] or placebo [group B (n = 40)] for 6 months. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and cardiac biomarkers (cardiac troponin I [cTnI], probrain natriuretic peptide [proBNP], and creatine kinase MB [CK-MB]) were assessed at baseline and 6 months. The primary outcome was a measured decrease in LVEF (≥20%). Secondary outcome measures were changes in cardiac biomarkers and the development of heart failure or arrhythmias. RESULTS LVEF decreased in both groups at 6 months, more so in group B (62.25 ± 5.49 vs 56.15 ± 4.79, P < 0.001). A ≥20% decrease was seen in 3 patients in group B but none in group A (P = 0.21). Cardiac biomarkers increased more in group B at 6 months, and the increase was significant for proBNP (49.60 ± 35.97 vs 98.60 ± 54.24, P < 0.001) and cTnI (0.01 ± 0.00 vs 0.011 ± 0.003, P = 0.035) but not significant for CK-MB (1.08 ± 0.18 vs 1.21 ± 0.44, P = 0.079). In group A, 9.1% of the patients showed an increase in proBNP level ≥100 compared with 37.5% in group B (P < 0.001). No patient developed heart failure or arrhythmia. CONCLUSION Enalapril has a role in reducing cardiac toxicity after anthracycline administration.
-
9.
New Therapeutic Approaches for the Treatment of Hyperkalemia in Patients Treated with Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors.
Tamargo, J, Caballero, R, Delpón, E
Cardiovascular drugs and therapy. 2018;(1):99-119
Abstract
Hyperkalemia (serum potassium > 5.5 mEq/L) is a common clinical problem in patients with chronic kidney disease, hypertension, diabetes, and heart failure. It can result from increased K+ intake, impaired distribution between intracellular and extracellular spaces, and most frequently, decreased renal excretion. Patients at the highest risk of hyperkalemia are treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) as they improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes and are strongly recommended in clinical guidelines. However, RAASIs cause or increase the risk of hyperkalemia, a key limitation to fully titrate RAASIs in patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment. Until recently, drugs for the treatment of hyperkalemia presented limited efficacy and/or safety concerns and there was an unmet need of new drugs to control hyperkalemia while maintaining RAASI therapy. We provide an overview of the mechanisms involved in K+ homeostasis and the epidemiology and management of hyperkalemia as a complication in cardiovascular patients and, finally, analyze the efficacy and safety of two new polymer-based, non-systemic agents, patiromer calcium and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9), designed to increase fecal K+ loss and to normalize elevated serum K+ levels and chronically maintain K+ homeostasis in hyperkalemic patients treated with RAASIs.
-
10.
Use of Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade in Advanced CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Report.
Weir, MR, Lakkis, JI, Jaar, B, Rocco, MV, Choi, MJ, Kramer, HJ, Ku, E
American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2018;(6):873-884
Abstract
Multiple clinical trials have demonstrated that renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers effectively reduces chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. However, most clinical trials excluded participants with advanced CKD (ie, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]<30mL/min/1.73m2). It is acknowledged that initiation of RAS blockade is often associated with an acute reduction in eGFR, which is thought to be functional, but may result in long-term preservation of kidney function through the reductions in glomerular intracapillary pressure conferred by these agents. In this National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) report, we discuss the controversies regarding use of RAS blockade in patients with advanced kidney disease. We review available published data on this topic and provide perspective on the impact of RAS blockade on changes in eGFRs and potassium levels. We conclude that more research is needed to evaluate the therapeutic index of RAS blockade in patients with advanced CKD.