1.
Effects of Plant-Based Diets on Weight Status: A Systematic Review.
Tran, E, Dale, HF, Jensen, C, Lied, GA
Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy. 2020;13:3433-3448
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Being overweight or obese is a huge risk factor for many detrimental conditions. It is estimated that around one-third of the world’s population will be overweight or obese by 2025. Hence there is a need to look at dietary strategies in the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity. Plant-based diets have always existed, however interest in the topic has increased recently and more research is being done on the health-related effects of different plant-based diets. There are many reasons why someone might convert to a plant-based diet, possible health benefits such as weight management are among the most common. The purpose of this review was to evaluate intervention studies assessing the effects of different plant-based diets on body mass index and weight. The results suggest that plant-based diets may improve weight status in some patient groups. It should be noted that only one study out of the 19 included in the review had normal weight, clinically healthy participants. The study populations for the rest were overweight, obese or had type 2 diabetes. Future research should aim to include a representative study population and apply study diets without dietary restrictions.
Abstract
There is an increasing number of people who convert to a plant-based diet. The desire for health benefits, including weight management, is often a contributing factor behind this dietary choice. The purpose of this review was to evaluate intervention studies assessing the effects of different plant-based diets on body mass index and weight. A literature search was conducted in PubMed until December 2019. Twenty-two publications from 19 studies were included. The majority of them were randomized controlled trials comparing a low-fat vegan diet to an omnivore diet in participants with overweight, type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or cardiovascular disease. All studies reported weight reductions, of which seven revealed significant differences, and four revealed non-significant differences between the intervention and the control groups. The results suggest that plant-based diets may improve weight status in some patient groups. Due to restrictions in fat intake in many studies, followed by reduced energy intake, the effects of the different interventions differ depending on the specific plant-based diets investigated. Future research should aim to include a representative study population and apply study diets without dietary restrictions.
2.
Non-Nutritive Sweeteners and Their Implications on the Development of Metabolic Syndrome.
Liauchonak, I, Qorri, B, Dawoud, F, Riat, Y, Szewczuk, MR
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, neotame, saccharin, sucralose, and stevia are widely promoted as low-calorie alternatives to sugar and are known as non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS). Generally, they have been considered as a healthy option to replace sugars, but data is emerging that they may influence obesity and metabolic syndrome (METs) and contribute to the development of type II diabetes. These non-nutritive sweeteners can be thousands of times sweeter than sugar and have been widely adopted by the food industry to help reduce calories, and promote weight loss and diabetic products. It is believed that 25% of children and 41% of adults consume low-calorie sweeteners regularly, with the beverage industry relying heavily on them. However, it is now been shown that these sweeteners can cause imbalances to gut bacteria and interact with taste receptors and insulin signalling. These findings mean that artificial sweeteners may trigger the same hormonal response as sugar by releasing insulin and overtime lead to insulin resistance, obesity, and overall metabolic syndrome. Finally, there is evidence that our body develops a learned response to sweeteners which paradoxically leads to weight gain.
Abstract
Individuals widely use non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) in attempts to lower their overall daily caloric intake, lose weight, and sustain a healthy diet. There are insufficient scientific data that support the safety of consuming NNS. However, recent studies have suggested that NNS consumption can induce gut microbiota dysbiosis and promote glucose intolerance in healthy individuals that may result in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This sequence of events may result in changes in the gut microbiota composition through microRNA (miRNA)-mediated changes. The mechanism(s) by which miRNAs alter gene expression of different bacterial species provides a link between the consumption of NNS and the development of metabolic changes. Another potential mechanism that connects NNS to metabolic changes is the molecular crosstalk between the insulin receptor (IR) and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we aim to highlight the role of NNS in obesity and discuss IR-GPCR crosstalk and miRNA-mediated changes, in the manipulation of the gut microbiota composition and T2DM pathogenesis.
3.
A novel boswellic acids delivery form (Casperome®) in the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a review.
Riva, A, Allegrini, P, Franceschi, F, Togni, S, Giacomelli, L, Eggenhoffner, R
European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2017;21(22):5258-5263
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Musculoskeletal conditions, including osteoarthritis, inflammatory arthritis, musculoskeletal injuries, gout and metabolic bone disease, are the most common cause of chronic disability worldwide. Treatment with analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory medication carries a significant risk of side effects. Botanical extracts are also commonly used for the management of musculoskeletal disorders, and in addition to having less side effects they may have a beneficial effect on the course of the disease. This review focuses on the use of boswellic acids (BA, from Frankincense, Boswellia serrata and Boswellia carterii) in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. In pre-clinical experiments, BAs have been shown to be anti-inflammatory and improve antioxidant status. In several clinical trials BSE was superior to placebo in reducing pain and increasing functionality in osteoarthritis. BSE are poorly absorbed, and both clinical and pre-clinical research has shown that a combination of BAs with lecithin (Casperome®) enhances absorption and bioavailability. Casperome® has been investigated in a number of clinical trials and has been shown to be of benefit in tendinopathies (inflammation of the elbow and Achilles tendon), radiculopathies (pinched nerves), sprained ankles and sports injuries. The authors conclude that Casperome® is a promising remedy as part of an integrated approach to musculoskeletal disorders.
Abstract
Standard pharmacological treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is often associated with relevant side effects. Botanical preparations endowed with a good tolerability profile, therefore, could have a role in the management of these disorders. Among different natural products, Boswellia serrata extracts have long been used for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders, given their marked anti-inflammatory activity and their ability to promote tissue regeneration. However, standard preparations of Boswellia serrata show overall modest pharmacokinetic properties, a limitation which may ultimately lead to reduced efficacy. In an effort to improve the pharmacokinetic properties, Casperome®, a lecithin-based formulation of Boswellia serrata extract representing the whole natural bouquet, has been developed. This formulation was effective in the treatment of Achilles tendonitis, epicondylitis, radiculopathies, ankle sprains and sport injuries as shown in several clinical studies, the majority of which with a randomized design and all evaluating a number of well-recognized parameters of efficacy for the therapy of musculoskeletal disorder. All studies were consistent in showing a prompt decrease of pain and improvement of functionality of the affected area after supplementation with Casperome®, without any relevant adverse effect. Remarkably, these symptomatic improvements were paralleled by reduced plasmatic levels of inflammatory markers and by a diminished need for rescue analgesics. On these bases, Casperome® may have a role in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Clinical studies in other similar conditions (e.g., osteoarthritis) appear warranted to further investigate the efficacy of this botanical product in more specific settings.
4.
Strategies to improve the implementation of healthy eating, physical activity and obesity prevention policies, practices or programmes within childcare services.
Wolfenden, L, Jones, J, Williams, CM, Finch, M, Wyse, RJ, Kingsland, M, Tzelepis, F, Wiggers, J, Williams, AJ, Seward, K, et al
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2016;10:CD011779
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Population-based approaches to childhood obesity prevention has identified centre-based childcare services as an effective platform for promoting healthy behaviours in children. While many studies have applied various strategies in this setting, a comprehensive review on programme and policy implementation is warranted. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of strategies to improve implementation of programmes by childcare services that promote healthy behaviours for children around diet, physical activity and obesity prevention. Based on the current literature, only 10 trials were identified and the findings were ambiguous. Most trials reported implementation support as beneficial for at least one practice or policy, however the impact was not significant. According to these findings, the authors highlight how little guidance is available for policy makers in this field and conclude that these practices in childcare services are only in the early stages of development.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the existence of effective interventions and best-practice guideline recommendations for childcare services to implement policies, practices and programmes to promote child healthy eating, physical activity and prevent unhealthy weight gain, many services fail to do so. OBJECTIVES The primary aim of the review was to examine the effectiveness of strategies aimed at improving the implementation of policies, practices or programmes by childcare services that promote child healthy eating, physical activity and/or obesity prevention. The secondary aims of the review were to:1. describe the impact of such strategies on childcare service staff knowledge, skills or attitudes;2. describe the cost or cost-effectiveness of such strategies;3. describe any adverse effects of such strategies on childcare services, service staff or children;4. examine the effect of such strategies on child diet, physical activity or weight status. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases on 3 August 2015: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE In Process, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL and SCOPUS. We also searched reference lists of included trials, handsearched two international implementation science journals and searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp/) and ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov). SELECTION CRITERIA We included any study (randomised or non-randomised) with a parallel control group that compared any strategy to improve the implementation of a healthy eating, physical activity or obesity prevention policy, practice or programme by staff of centre-based childcare services to no intervention, 'usual' practice or an alternative strategy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The review authors independently screened abstracts and titles, extracted trial data and assessed risk of bias in pairs; we resolved discrepancies via consensus. Heterogeneity across studies precluded pooling of data and undertaking quantitative assessment via meta-analysis. However, we narratively synthesised the trial findings by describing the effect size of the primary outcome measure for policy or practice implementation (or the median of such measures where a single primary outcome was not stated). MAIN RESULTS We identified 10 trials as eligible and included them in the review. The trials sought to improve the implementation of policies and practices targeting healthy eating (two trials), physical activity (two trials) or both healthy eating and physical activity (six trials). Collectively the implementation strategies tested in the 10 trials included educational materials, educational meetings, audit and feedback, opinion leaders, small incentives or grants, educational outreach visits or academic detailing. A total of 1053 childcare services participated across all trials. Of the 10 trials, eight examined implementation strategies versus a usual practice control and two compared alternative implementation strategies. There was considerable study heterogeneity. We judged all studies as having high risk of bias for at least one domain.It is uncertain whether the strategies tested improved the implementation of policies, practices or programmes that promote child healthy eating, physical activity and/or obesity prevention. No intervention improved the implementation of all policies and practices targeted by the implementation strategies relative to a comparison group. Of the eight trials that compared an implementation strategy to usual practice or a no intervention control, however, seven reported improvements in the implementation of at least one of the targeted policies or practices relative to control. For these trials the effect on the primary implementation outcome was as follows: among the three trials that reported score-based measures of implementation the scores ranged from 1 to 5.1; across four trials reporting the proportion of staff or services implementing a specific policy or practice this ranged from 0% to 9.5%; and in three trials reporting the time (per day or week) staff or services spent implementing a policy or practice this ranged from 4.3 minutes to 7.7 minutes. The review findings also indicate that is it uncertain whether such interventions improve childcare service staff knowledge or attitudes (two trials), child physical activity (two trials), child weight status (two trials) or child diet (one trial). None of the included trials reported on the cost or cost-effectiveness of the intervention. One trial assessed the adverse effects of a physical activity intervention and found no difference in rates of child injury between groups. For all review outcomes, we rated the quality of the evidence as very low. The primary limitation of the review was the lack of conventional terminology in implementation science, which may have resulted in potentially relevant studies failing to be identified based on the search terms used in this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Current research provides weak and inconsistent evidence of the effectiveness of such strategies in improving the implementation of policies and practices, childcare service staff knowledge or attitudes, or child diet, physical activity or weight status. Further research in the field is required.