1.
Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer.
Meng, C, Bai, C, Brown, TD, Hood, LE, Tian, Q
Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics. 2018;16(1):33-49
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In this article the authors review research on the influence of the human gut microbiota on the development and progression of gastrointestinal cancers, and go into significant detail about the molecular mechanisms involved. Helicobacter pylori is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC) but other dysbiotic changes in the gut microbiota are also observed in GC. On the other hand, H. pylori is associated with a decreased risk for oesophageal cancer (OC). An increase in gram-negative bacteria is associated with OC, whilst gram-positive bacteria are dominant in a healthy oesophagus. Dietary factors are associated with the risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) and may be due to their effect on the bacterial composition of the bowel. The authors explore possible mechanisms for these links. Although the liver is considered sterile, carcinogenesis can be influenced by the gut microbiota through pathogens and bacterial metabolites which can disturb metabolic pathways and immune responses in the liver. In pancreatic cancer (PC), the gut microbiota may influence carcinogenesis by promoting inflammation. In addition to various lifestyle factors, H. pylori is a risk factor for PC. The authors also review the use of prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics (a combination of pre- and pro-biotics) and Traditional Chinese Medicine as an adjunct to conventional cancer treatment to reduce side effects, as well as their potential preventive mechanisms.
Abstract
Human gut microbiota play an essential role in both healthy and diseased states of humans. In the past decade, the interactions between microorganisms and tumors have attracted much attention in the efforts to understand various features of the complex microbial communities, as well as the possible mechanisms through which the microbiota are involved in cancer prevention, carcinogenesis, and anti-cancer therapy. A large number of studies have indicated that microbial dysbiosis contributes to cancer susceptibility via multiple pathways. Further studies have suggested that the microbiota and their associated metabolites are not only closely related to carcinogenesis by inducing inflammation and immune dysregulation, which lead to genetic instability, but also interfere with the pharmacodynamics of anticancer agents. In this article, we mainly reviewed the influence of gut microbiota on cancers in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract (including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers) and the regulation of microbiota by diet, prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, or the Traditional Chinese Medicine. We also proposed some new strategies in the prevention and treatment of GI cancers that could be explored in the future. We hope that this review could provide a comprehensive overview of the studies on the interactions between the gut microbiota and GI cancers, which are likely to yield translational opportunities to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality by improving prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.
2.
Fructose metabolism and metabolic disease.
Hannou, SA, Haslam, DE, McKeown, NM, Herman, MA
The Journal of clinical investigation. 2018;128(2):545-555
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Sugar consumption is thought to be a contributing factor in the increase in diabetes and obesity and the associated risk of cardiovascular disease worldwide. Sucrose (table sugar) and high fructose corn syrup contain almost equal amounts of fructose and glucose and are commonly added to processed foods. Whilst long-term studies are lacking, some short-term intervention studies show that fructose can impair lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in humans. This article reviews the biochemistry and molecular genetics of fructose metabolism as well as potential mechanisms by which excessive fructose consumption contributes to cardiometabolic disease. Fructose absorption in the human intestine is saturable, and there is a large range in capacity to absorb fructose between individuals, and unabsorbed fructose may contribute to gastrointestinal symptoms including pain and bloating. Fructose concentrations in the blood can increase 10-fold after consumption, but are rapidly cleared, mostly by the liver, where it provides substrate for metabolic processes, but may also be involved in signalling functions. Fructose may enhance glucose uptake by the liver and storage as glycogen and lipids. It may also increase production of uric acid which is implicated with gout. Excessive fructose consumption affects lipid metabolism and may contribute to fat accumulation in the liver and increase circulating triglycerides, a risk factor for heart disease. In animal models it also induces increased insulin levels. Fructose is one of the sweetest sugars which may affect appetite and overeating. It may also induce addiction-like behaviours such as binging and dependence in part by stimulating dopaminergic pathways. It also appears to induce leptin resistance which further increases food intake and obesity.
Abstract
Increased sugar consumption is increasingly considered to be a contributor to the worldwide epidemics of obesity and diabetes and their associated cardiometabolic risks. As a result of its unique metabolic properties, the fructose component of sugar may be particularly harmful. Diets high in fructose can rapidly produce all of the key features of the metabolic syndrome. Here we review the biology of fructose metabolism as well as potential mechanisms by which excessive fructose consumption may contribute to cardiometabolic disease.
3.
Dietary and Policy Priorities for Cardiovascular Disease, Diabetes, and Obesity: A Comprehensive Review.
Mozaffarian, D
Circulation. 2016;133(2):187-225
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Diet-related cardiometabolic conditions, such as heart disease and diabetes, pose a significant health and economic burden across the world. In recent years, scientific advances and research have generated enormous insights, yet there remain many controversies and unanswered questions. This extensive review summarizes recent evidence of key-dietary components and their impact on cardiometabolic health. Amongst the topics covered are dietary patterns, food quality and processing, genetics, personalized nutrition, supplements, functional foods and the existing knowledge on selected food groups such as carbohydrates, meat and fats alongside relevant vitamins, minerals and plant compounds. The author highlights how an oversimplified concept of nutrition from previous decades, has led to an array of conflicting advice and undermined the nuanced and complex impact that diet and nutrition can have on the body. Thus in light of the evidence, food-based interventions and dietary patterns are suggested as favourable, with less focus on dietary components in isolation. Throughout the paper, the need for adjunct support to facilitate sustainable health-promoting behaviour changes is recognized. Calling for additional measures to address behaviour change, health systems reforms, targeting socioeconomic inequalities, employing novel technologies, and adequate policymaking. This overview of recent evidence yields a comprehensive source of information, worthwhile reviewing when designing personalised diet plans in support of cardiometabolic health.
Abstract
Suboptimal nutrition is a leading cause of poor health. Nutrition and policy science have advanced rapidly, creating confusion yet also providing powerful opportunities to reduce the adverse health and economic impacts of poor diets. This review considers the history, new evidence, controversies, and corresponding lessons for modern dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular diseases, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. Major identified themes include the importance of evaluating the full diversity of diet-related risk pathways, not only blood lipids or obesity; focusing on foods and overall diet patterns, rather than single isolated nutrients; recognizing the complex influences of different foods on long-term weight regulation, rather than simply counting calories; and characterizing and implementing evidence-based strategies, including policy approaches, for lifestyle change. Evidence-informed dietary priorities include increased fruits, nonstarchy vegetables, nuts, legumes, fish, vegetable oils, yogurt, and minimally processed whole grains; and fewer red meats, processed (eg, sodium-preserved) meats, and foods rich in refined grains, starch, added sugars, salt, and trans fat. More investigation is needed on the cardiometabolic effects of phenolics, dairy fat, probiotics, fermentation, coffee, tea, cocoa, eggs, specific vegetable and tropical oils, vitamin D, individual fatty acids, and diet-microbiome interactions. Little evidence to date supports the cardiometabolic relevance of other popular priorities: eg, local, organic, grass-fed, farmed/wild, or non-genetically modified. Evidence-based personalized nutrition appears to depend more on nongenetic characteristics (eg, physical activity, abdominal adiposity, gender, socioeconomic status, culture) than genetic factors. Food choices must be strongly supported by clinical behavior change efforts, health systems reforms, novel technologies, and robust policy strategies targeting economic incentives, schools and workplaces, neighborhood environments, and the food system. Scientific advances provide crucial new insights on optimal targets and best practices to reduce the burdens of diet-related cardiometabolic diseases.