1.
Effect of an enzyme-containing mouthwash on the dental biofilm and salivary microbiome in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances: a randomized placebo-controlled pilot trial.
Hoffstedt, T, Skov Hansen, LB, Twetman, S, Sonesson, M
European journal of orthodontics. 2023;45(1):96-102
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fixed orthodontic appliances are associated with dysbiosis in the oral cavity which may result in demineralisations of the enamel. Antiseptic mouthwashes have been shown to control the formation of cariogenic biofilm but may have negative effects on the salivary microbiome. The aim of this 8-day double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, including 35 adolescents with fixed orthodontics, was to evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash (EBM), used twice daily, on dental biofilm (plaque) formation and salivary microbiome. At 8 days, a statistically and clinically significant decrease in the orthodontic plaque index was seen in the EBM group, whilst no change was seen in the placebo group. There were no statistically significant changes in microbiome between groups but a trend to increased richness in the placebo group. The authors concluded that the use of an enzyme-based mouthwash alongside regular toothbrushing reduced dental biofilm in adolescents with orthodontics without affecting the salivary microbiome.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mouthwashes containing oral antiseptics or enzymes are suggested suitable for controlling biofilm accumulation in patients with fixed appliances and thereby limiting unwanted side effects during the orthodontic treatment. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of an enzyme-based mouthwash on the amount of dental biofilm and the composition of the salivary microbiome in patients undergoing treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. TRIAL DESIGN Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 35 young adolescents (14-18 years) under treatment with fixed appliances were consecutively enrolled and randomly allocated to an experimental or a placebo group by opening a computer-generated numbered envelope. The subjects were instructed to rinse twice daily during an intervention period of 8 days with experimental mouthwash or placebo without active enzymes. Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected at baseline and after 8 days. The participants and examiner were blinded for the allocation. The primary outcome was the Orthodontic Plaque Index (OPI) and the secondary was the composition of the salivary microbiome. RESULTS In total, 28 adolescents (21 females and 7 males) completed the trial and there were no differences in age, clinical, or microbial findings between the test (n = 14) and the placebo group (n = 14) at baseline. We found a decreased OPI in the test group after 8 days and the difference was statistically significant compared with the placebo group (P < 0.05). There were no significant treatment effects on the richness and global composition of the salivary microbiome. HARMS In total, one participant in the test group claimed nausea and abandoned the project. In total, two participants did not like the taste of the mouthwash but used it as instructed. No other adverse events or side effects were reported. LIMITATIONS Short-term pilot trials may by nature be sensitive for selection and performance biases and are not designed to unveil persisting effects. CONCLUSION Daily use of enzyme-containing mouthwash reduced the amount of dental biofilm in adolescents under treatment with the fixed orthodontic appliances, without affecting the composition of the salivary microbiota. ETHICAL APPROVAL Approved by the Regional Ethical Board, Lund, Sweden (Dnr 2020-05221). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05033015.
2.
Role of Probiotics in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Does Gut Microbiota Matter?
Xie, C, Halegoua-DeMarzio, D
Nutrients. 2019;11(11)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterised by an excessive accumulation of fat in the liver tissue, without excessive alcohol consumption, and appears to be related to metabolic syndrome. It is thought to have a prevalence of 25% globally and there are no pharmacological treatments available. This review discusses the connection between the gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD. Various mechanisms by which the GM may be involved in the development of NAFLD are discussed. As probiotics and prebiotics can normalise GM and reverse dysbiosis their use may benefit patients with NAFLD. This has been confirmed in animal models. The authors review 26 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of probiotics and/or prebiotics in the treatment of NAFLD which evaluate biochemical markers, as well as five meta-analyses, and found that overall there is strong evidence that probiotics and/or prebiotics can lower ALT and AST (markers of NAFLD), although results for other biochemical markers were mixed. They also reviewed RCTs assessing NAFLD by imaging and histological means, and again found benefits from probiotic and/or prebiotic supplementation.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the hepatic consequence of metabolic syndrome, which often also includes obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The connection between gut microbiota (GM) and NAFLD has attracted significant attention in recent years. Data has shown that GM affects hepatic lipid metabolism and influences the balance between pro/anti-inflammatory effectors in the liver. Although studies reveal the association between GM dysbiosis and NAFLD, decoding the mechanisms of gut dysbiosis resulting in NAFLD remains challenging. The potential pathophysiology that links GM dysbiosis to NAFLD can be summarized as: (1) disrupting the balance between energy harvest and expenditure, (2) promoting hepatic inflammation (impairing intestinal integrity, facilitating endotoxemia, and initiating inflammatory cascades with cytokines releasing), and (3) altered biochemistry metabolism and GM-related metabolites (i.e., bile acid, short-chain fatty acids, aromatic amino acid derivatives, branched-chain amino acids, choline, ethanol). Due to the hypothesis that probiotics/synbiotics could normalize GM and reverse dysbiosis, there have been efforts to investigate the therapeutic effect of probiotics/synbiotics in patients with NAFLD. Recent randomized clinical trials suggest that probiotics/synbiotics could improve transaminases, hepatic steatosis, and reduce hepatic inflammation. Despite these promising results, future studies are necessary to understand the full role GM plays in NAFLD development and progression. Additionally, further data is needed to unravel probiotics/synbiotics efficacy, safety, and sustainability as a novel pharmacologic approaches to NAFLD.
3.
Elevated methane levels in small intestinal bacterial overgrowth suggests delayed small bowel and colonic transit.
Suri, J, Kataria, R, Malik, Z, Parkman, HP, Schey, R
Medicine. 2018;97(21):e10554
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Whilst the most conclusive way to diagnose SIBO is to use an invasive procedure (endoscopy) to take samples from the middle section of the small intestine (jejunum), lactulose breath testing of methane and hydrogen gasses has become the most commonly used test to rule SIBO in or out. This cohort study used historic data (retrospective) of 78 individuals to compare intestinal transit time in patients with a positive lactulose breath test to those with a negative result, as well as compare patients with hydrogen-positive results with those with methane-positive results. All patients experienced gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of nausea, bloating, constipation, diarrhea and gas to varying degrees. No significant difference in GI symptom severity was found between those with a positive lactulose breath test and those with a negative result. However, those with a hydrogen-gas positive result had a significantly higher level of reported nausea compared to the methane-gas positive patients. A positive SIBO result on the breath test also did not affect GI transit time in comparison to a negative result. However, those with a methane-gas peak on their positive lactulose breath test had a statistically significant slower GI transit time when compared to those with a hydrogen-positive result.
Abstract
Limited research exists regarding the relationship between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), small bowel transit (SBT), and colonic transit (CT). Furthermore, symptom analysis is limited between the subtypes of SIBO hydrogen producing (H-SIBO) and methane producing (M-SIBO). The primary aims of this study are to: compare the SBT and CT in patients with a positive lactulose breath test (LBT) to those with a normal study; compare the SBT and CT among patients with H-SIBO or M-SIBO; compare the severity of symptoms in patients with a positive LBT to those with a normal study; compare the severity of symptoms among patients with H-SIBO or M-SIBO.A retrospective review was performed for 89 patients who underwent a LBT and whole gut transit scintigraphy (WGTS) between 2014 and 2016. Seventy-eight patients were included. WGTS evaluated gastric emptying, SBT (normal ≥40% radiotracer bolus accumulated at the ileocecal valve at 6 hours), and CT (normal geometric center of colonic activity = 1.6-7.0 at 24 hours, 4.0-7.0 at 48 hours, 6.2-7.0 at 72 hours; elevated geometric center indicates increased transit). We also had patients complete a pretest symptom survey to evaluate nausea, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, belching, and flatulence.A total of 78 patients (69 females, 9 males, mean age of 48 years, mean BMI of 25.9) were evaluated. Forty-seven patients had a positive LBT (H-SIBO 66%, M-SIBO 34%). Comparison of SBT among patients with a positive LBT to normal LBT revealed no significant difference (62.1% vs 58.6%, P = .63). The mean accumulated radiotracer was higher for H-SIBO compared to M-SIBO (71.5% vs 44.1%; P < .05). For CT, all SIBO patients had no significant difference in geometric centers of colonic activity at 24, 48, and 72 hours when compared to the normal group. When subtyping, H-SIBO had significantly higher geometric centers compared to the M-SIBO group at 24 hours (4.4 vs 3.1, P < .001), 48 hours (5.2 vs 3.8, P = .002), and at 72 hours (5.6 vs 4.3, P = .006). The symptom severity scores did not differ between the positive and normal LBT groups. A higher level of nausea was present in the H-SIBO group when compared to the M-SIBO group.Overall, the presence of SIBO does not affect SBT or CT at 24, 48, and 72 hours. However, when analyzing the subtypes, M-SIBO has significantly more delayed SBT and CT when compared to H-SIBO. These results suggest the presence of delayed motility in patients with high methane levels on LBT.