-
1.
Effect of probiotics or prebiotics on thyroid function: A meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials.
Shu, Q, Kang, C, Li, J, Hou, Z, Xiong, M, Wang, X, Peng, H
PloS one. 2024;19(1):e0296733
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The gut microbiome is thought to play a role in thyroid disorders, mediated by regulating iodine uptake, degradation and enterohepatic cycling of thyroid hormones, and differences in microbiome composition between patients with thyroid disorders and healthy individuals have been observed. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of pro-, pre- and synbiotics on thyroid function (thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4) and free triiodothyronine (fT3) and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb)) in patients with and without thyroid disorders. 8 randomised controlled trials including 367 participants were included in the review and meta-analysis. Neither pro-, pre- nor synbiotics had a significant effect on TSH, fT4 or fT3 but pre- and probiotics lead to a significant reduction in TRAb in patients with Graves’ disease.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microbiome-directed therapies are increasingly utilized to optimize thyroid function in both healthy individuals and those with thyroid disorders. However, recent doubts have been raised regarding the efficacy of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics in improving thyroid function. This systematic review aimed to investigate the potential relationship between probiotics/prebiotics and thyroid function by analyzing the impact on thyroid hormone levels. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), and thyroid stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) levels. We searched for articles from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up until April 1st, 2023, without any language restriction. Quantitative data analysis was performed using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval as summary statistics. The methods and results were reported according to the PRISMA2020 statement. RESULTS A total of eight articles were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed no significant alterations in TSH (SMD: -0.01, 95% CI: -0.21, 0.20, P = 0.93; I2: 0.00%), fT4 (SMD: 0.04, 95% CI: -0.29, 0.21, P = 0.73; I2: 0.00%) or fT3 (SMD: 0.45, 95% CI: -0.14, 1.03, P = 0.43; I2: 78.00%), while a significant reduction in TRAb levels was observed (SMD: -0.85, 95% CI: -1.54, -0.15, P = 0.02; I2: 18.00%) following probiotics/prebiotics supplementation. No indication of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS Probiotics/prebiotics supplementation does not influence thyroid hormone levels, but may modestly reduce TRAb levels in patients with Graves' disease.
-
2.
Gut microbiota modulate distal symmetric polyneuropathy in patients with diabetes.
Yang, J, Yang, X, Wu, G, Huang, F, Shi, X, Wei, W, Zhang, Y, Zhang, H, Cheng, L, Yu, L, et al
Cell metabolism. 2023;35(9):1548-1562.e7
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) is the most common complication associated with diabetes, which can lead to pain, numbness, and weakness or tingling in the limbs or parts of the body. There are no cures for DSPN only drugs to manage symptoms, highlighting a need for further research. Recently it has been shown that the gut microbiota of individuals with DSPN differs to that of healthy individuals, but it is unclear as to the significance of this. This randomised control trial aimed to determine the effect of transplanting faecal microbiota from healthy individuals into those with DSPN. The results showed that DSPN was associated with a decreased abundance of beneficial gut bacteria and an increased abundance of pathogenic bacteria. Furthermore, compared to placebo, DSPN was alleviated in all 22 patients who received a faecal microbiota transplant from healthy subjects. There was an increase in gut microbiota associated with the production of beneficial short chain fatty acids and a decrease in toxin production. It was concluded that dysbiosis in the gut microbiota contributes to DSPN, which can be alleviated by faecal microbial transplant from healthy individuals. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the gut microbiota has an important role in DSPN. Further larger studies would be warranted before recommending faecal microbial transplant to individuals with this disorder.
Abstract
The pathogenic mechanisms underlying distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN), a common neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), are not fully understood. Here, we discover that the gut microbiota from patients with DSPN can induce a phenotype exhibiting more severe peripheral neuropathy in db/db mice. In a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trial (ChiCTR1800017257), compared to 10 patients who received placebo, DSPN was significantly alleviated in the 22 patients who received fecal microbiota transplants from healthy donors, independent of glycemic control. The gut bacterial genomes that correlated with the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (TCSS) score were organized in two competing guilds. Increased guild 1, which had higher capacity in butyrate production, and decreased guild 2, which harbored more genes in synthetic pathway of endotoxin, were associated with improved gut barrier integrity and decreased proinflammatory cytokine levels. Moreover, matched enterotype between transplants and recipients showed better therapeutic efficacy with more enriched guild 1 and suppressed guild 2. Thus, changes in these two competing guilds may play a causative role in DSPN and have the potential for therapeutic targeting.
-
3.
Sustained Diet-Induced Remission in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Is Associated With Kynurenine and Serotonin Pathways.
Ghiboub, M, Boneh, RS, Sovran, B, Wine, E, Lefèvre, A, Emond, P, Verburgt, CM, Benninga, MA, de Jonge, WJ, Van Limbergen, JE
Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2023;29(5):684-694
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Crohn’s disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease associated with alterations in intestinal tryptophan metabolism, in particular with increases in metabolites of the kynurenine pathway and decreased metabolites of the serotonin pathway. The aim of this 12-week randomised clinical study was to evaluate the effect of CD exclusion diet with partial enteral nutrition (CDED+PEN) and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) on intestinal tryptophan metabolism (as measured in faeces) in 43 children with mild-to-moderate CD. 13 of 15 patients on CDED+PEN and 9/13 on EEN achieved remission at week 6, and 8/9 and 6/9 patients, respectively, maintained remission at 12 weeks. Some kynurenine pathway metabolites decreased and some serotonin metabolites increased, in patients who achieved induction and maintenance of remission. These changes were similar in both intervention groups. On the other hand, in patients on EEN who did not go into remission, these changes were not observed. The authors concluded that further studies are warranted to inform whether there is a causal link and to refine nutritional interventions.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both the Crohn's disease exclusion diet combined with partial enteral nutrition (CDED+PEN) and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) can induce remission in mild-to-moderate pediatric Crohn's disease and are associated with a marked decrease in fecal kynurenine levels. This suggests a link between clinical outcome of dietary therapy and changes in tryptophan metabolism pathways. Here, we characterize the changes in several fecal tryptophan metabolites induced by CDED+PEN or EEN and their association with remission. METHODS A total of 21 tryptophan metabolites were quantified in fecal samples from a 12-week prospective randomized trial with CDED+PEN or EEN for induction of remission in mild to moderate pediatric Crohn's disease. Tryptophan metabolites at week 0 (W0), W6, and W12 of 73 samples were quantitatively measured by liquid chromatography coupled with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry, and data were analyzed according to clinical groups of baselines (W0), induced remission at W6, no remission, sustained remission at W12, and nonsustained remission. RESULTS Reduction in components of the kynurenine pathway, such as kynurenine and quinolinic acid, were strongly associated with induced remission with both CDED+PEN and EEN, which were maintained in sustained remission. Specific serotonin pathway metabolites, such as melatonin, N-acetylserotonin, and 5-OH-tryptophan, were significantly increased in fecal samples from patients maintaining remission at W12 with both CDED+PEN and EEN. Importantly, in samples from patients failing to sustain remission, no changes were observed. Remission induction with EEN differs from CDED+PEN, particularly the moderate effects on indole pathway metabolites. The ratios of kynurenine and melatonin and quinolinic acid and melatonin perform well as markers for sustained remission. CONCLUSIONS The reduction in specific kynurenine pathway compounds and the increase in serotonin pathway compounds are associated with diet-induced and sustained remission. Further studies are warranted to assess causality and the association of these metabolites with specific diet and lifestyle factors, affecting sustained clinical remission. We show that fecal tryptophan metabolites are associated with remission following dietary therapy in a prospective clinical trial of pediatric Crohn’s disease patients. Our study shows that reduction in some kynurenine pathway metabolites and the increase in serotonin pathway compounds are associated with diet-induced and sustained remission. These compounds may play a role in mediating the mechanism of action of dietary therapy.
-
4.
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Jamshidi, P, Farsi, Y, Nariman, Z, Hatamnejad, MR, Mohammadzadeh, B, Akbarialiabad, H, Nasiri, MJ, Sechi, LA
International journal of molecular sciences. 2023;24(19)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder the cause of which is not yet fully elucidated. Probiotics, prebiotics and dietary changes have been shown to mitigate IBS symptoms whilst the results from studies of faecal microbiota transplants (FMT) have been inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomised controlled trials (RCT) was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FMT in IBS. 7 RCTs with a low risk of bias and no publication bias were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, no statistically significant effect was observed. A subgroup analysis by treatment modality showed that benefits were seen with lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT. Abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea and bloating were the most common adverse events, with no severe or critical adverse events reported. The authors call for larger and longer clinical trials to fill existing knowledge gaps.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) poses a significant challenge due to its poorly understood pathogenesis, substantial morbidity, and often inadequate treatment outcomes. The role of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in managing IBS symptoms remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of FMT in relieving symptoms in IBS patients. A thorough search was executed on PubMed/Medline and Embase databases until 14 June 2023, including all studies on FMT use in IBS patients. We examined the efficiency of FMT in reducing patients' symptoms overall and in particular subgroups, classified by placebo preparation, FMT preparation, frequency, and route of administration. Among 1015 identified studies, seven met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The overall symptomatology of FMT-treated IBS patients did not significantly differ from the control group (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.39-2.5). Multiple doses of FMT compared with non-FMT placebo, or single-donor FMT therapy compared with autologous FMT placebo also showed no significant benefit (OR = 0.32, 95%CI (0.07-1.32), p = 0.11, and OR = 1.67, 95%CI (0.59-4.67), p = 0.32, respectively). However, a single dose of multiple-donor FMT administered via colonoscopy (lower gastrointestinal (GI) administration) significantly improved patient symptoms compared with autologous FMT placebo (OR = 2.54, 95%CI (1.20-5.37), p = 0.01, and OR = 2.2, 95%CI (1.20-4.03), p = 0.01, respectively). The studies included in the analysis showed a low risk of bias and no publication bias. In conclusion, lower GI administration of a single dose of multiple-donor FMT significantly alleviates patient complaints compared with the autologous FMT used as a placebo. The underlying mechanisms need to be better understood, and further experimental studies are desired to fill the current gaps.
-
5.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Is Not Associated with an Increased Risk of Polyps and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Vichos, T, Rezaie, A, Vichos, P, Cash, B, Pimentel, M
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2023;68(6):2585-2596
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers and adenomatous colorectal polyps (CRP) are a risk factor for developing CRC. The potential role of functional disturbances seen in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) for the development of CRC are not yet clear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the occurrence of CRC and CRP in IBS patients. 14 cohort studies with a total of 654,764 IBS patients and 2,277,195 controls and six cross-sectional studies with 26,641 IBS patients and 87,803 controls were included in the review. Based on the pooled data from 5 cross-sectional studies, IBS patients had a significantly lower occurrence of CRP (by 71%). CRC risk was also reduced but this did not reach statistical significance. Only four of the 14 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis and, again, CRC risk was lower in IBS patients but this was not statistically significant.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in the US. Several factors are associated with increased/decreased CRC risk and often linked to adenomatous colorectal polyps (CRP). Recent studies suggest a lower risk of neoplastic lesions among irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. We aimed to systematically assess the occurrence of CRC and CRP in IBS patients. METHODS Searches of the Medline, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were performed, blindly and independently, by two investigators. Studies of CRC or CRP incidence in IBS patients (diagnosed by Rome or other symptom-based criteria) were eligible for inclusion. CRC and CRP effect estimates were pooled in meta-analyses using random models. RESULTS Of 4941 non-duplicate studies, 14 were included, comprising 654,764 IBS patients and 2,277,195 controls in 8 cohort studies, and 26,641 IBS patients and 87,803 controls in 6 cross-sectional studies. Pooled analysis revealed a significantly decreased prevalence of CRP in IBS subjects vs. controls, with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.29 (95% CI (0.15, 0.54)). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 96%, p < 0.01). This finding persisted when studies which did not report pre-cancerous polyps separately were excluded (OR 0.23, 95% CI (0.15, 0.35), I2 = 85%, p < 0.01). CRC prevalence was lower in IBS subjects, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.40, 95% CI (0.09, 1.77]). CONCLUSION Our analyses reveal a decreased incidence of colorectal polyps in IBS, although CRC did not reach significance. Mechanistic studies with detailed genotypic analysis and clinical phenotyping are needed to better elucidate the potentially protective effect of IBS on CRC development.
-
6.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.
-
7.
Effect of supplementation with probiotics or synbiotics on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Chen, T, Wang, J, Liu, Z, Gao, F
Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1282699
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Metabolic syndrome (metS) is characterised by insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, central obesity and/or high blood pressure and is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. MetS is associated with an imbalanced microbiome and some but not all studies have shown benefits of supplementation with probiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was to evaluate the effects of pro- or synbiotics on cardiovascular risk factors (body mass index, LDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose and systolic blood pressure) in patients with metS. 11 studies were included in the review of which 7 were judged to have a low risk of bias, whilst risk of bias was unclear in 4 articles. The meta-analysis found that pro- or synbiotics have a positive effect on body mass index, LDL cholesterol and fasting blood glucose but not on systolic blood pressure. Subgroup analysis of pro- and synbiotics separately also found no effects on systolic blood pressure.
Abstract
PURPOSE The effectiveness of probiotics or synbiotics in adults with metabolic syndromes (MetS) remains controversial, this meta-analysis will further analyze the effects of probiotics or synbiotics on cardiovascular factors in adults with MetS. METHODS We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and other databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of probiotics or synbiotics on MetS in adults up to July 2023, and used RevMan 5.4.0 software for statistical analysis. RESULTS This analysis included eleven RCTs (n = 608 participants), and the results showed that compared with the control group, supplementation with probiotics or synbiotics reduced body mass index (weighted mean difference, WMD = -0.83, 95% CI = [-1.21, -0.44], P <0.0001, n = 9), low-density lipoprotein (LDL-c) (standard mean difference, SMD = -0.24, 95% CI = [-0.41, -0.08], P = 0.004, n = 10), fasting blood glucose (FBG)(SMD = -0.17, 95% CI = [-0.33, -0.01], P = 0.03, n = 11), but had no beneficial effect on systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD = 1.24, 95% CI = [-2.06, 4.54], P = 0.46, n = 8) in MetS patients. CONCLUSION Supplementation with probiotics or synbiotics can reduce BMI, LDL-c, FBG in patients with MetS, but our findings did not demonstrate a favorable effect on reducing SBP. Future studies with larger samples and longer intervention periods are needed.
-
8.
Effects of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on serum creatinine in non-dialysis patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Liu, F, Liu, Y, Lv, X, Lun, H
Renal failure. 2023;45(1):2152693
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Creatinine is a biomarker of kidney function and is used to diagnose chronic kidney disease. The aim of this meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on serum creatinine levels in patients not receiving dialysis. 12 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis of which seven were judged to have a low risk of bias whilst 1 was judged to have a high risk of bias. Overall, there was no significant effect of supplementation on serum creatinine levels. The following three subgroup analyses also showed no significant effects on creatinine levels: 1) by probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics separately; 2) by duration: two months or less or longer than two months, 3) subgroup of 7 studies which included patients with non-dialysis kidney disease. The authors concluded that probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics do not decrease serum creatinine levels.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Serum creatinine level are influenced by many factors. Although accumulated data suggested that prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics supplements could affect serum creatinine level, the results remained controversial. The aim of the present paper was to evaluate the effects of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on serum creatinine in non-dialysis patients. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for eligible randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) which were limited to English language studies until 30 September 2022. A random-effects model was performed to analyze the impact of pooled trials. RESULT Twelve randomized, controlled trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. Prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics supplementation did not significantly decrease the serum creatinine levels in non-dialysis patients compared to placebo [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): (-0.21, 0.31); p = 0.72; I2 = 61%]. CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis indicated that supplementation with prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics could not act as promising adjuvant therapies to decrease the serum creatinine levels in non-dialysis patients.
-
9.
A meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics on acute pancreatitis.
Hou, X, Yang, J, Zhao, Z, Liu, L
Asian journal of surgery. 2023;46(9):3885-3889
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Acute pancreatitis is an inflammation and dysfunction of the pancreas due to abnormally activated pancreatic enzymes. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute pancreatitis. 16 randomised controlled trials including 1,305 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Probiotics led to reductions in the length of hospital stay, the duration of time in the intensive care unit, sepsis and overall infection rate. There were no significant effects on mortality, pancreatic complications, surgery, drainage rate and systemic complications.
-
10.
Multispecies probiotic administration reduces emotional salience and improves mood in subjects with moderate depression: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Baião, R, Capitão, LP, Higgins, C, Browning, M, Harmer, CJ, Burnet, PWJ
Psychological medicine. 2023;53(8):3437-3447
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Gut microbiota may be able to augment an individual’s mood, brain processing and cognition. Supplements containing live bacteria or a diet high in fibre which act as a substrate for beneficial gut bacteria may be of benefit to individuals with depression or mental illness. This 4-week randomised control trial aimed to determine the effect of a probiotic containing several different gut bacteria species on emotional processing and cognition in people with mild to moderate depression. The results showed that compared to placebo, probiotic intake increased empathy with others and improved some but not all aspects of cognition. Probiotic intake did not affect biological measures of stress but did improve feelings of depression. It was concluded that multispecies probiotics may change the emotional processing of people with depression. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that the use of probiotics may be a good option to reduce the risk of people with mild to moderate depression developing a major depressive disorder.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential antidepressant properties of probiotics have been suggested, but their influence on the emotional processes that may underlie this effect is unclear. METHODS Depressed volunteers (n = 71) were recruited into a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study to explore the effects of a daily, 4-week intake of a multispecies probiotic or placebo on emotional processing and cognition. Mood, anxiety, positive and negative affect, sleep, salivary cortisol and serum C-reactive peptide (CRP) were assessed before and after supplementation. RESULTS Compared with placebo, probiotic intake increased accuracy at identifying faces expressing all emotions (+12%, p < 0.05, total n = 51) and vigilance to neutral faces (mean difference between groups = 12.28 ms ± 6.1, p < 0.05, total n = 51). Probiotic supplementation also reduced reward learning (-9%, p < 0.05, total n = 51), and interference word recall on the auditory verbal learning task (-18%, p < 0.05, total n = 50), but did not affect other aspects of cognitive performance. Although actigraphy revealed a significant group × night-time activity interaction, follow up analysis was not significant (p = 0.094). Supplementation did not alter salivary cortisol or circulating CRP concentrations. Probiotic intake significantly reduced (-50% from baseline, p < 0.05, n = 35) depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, but these did not correlate with the changes in emotional processing. CONCLUSIONS The impartiality to positive and negative emotional stimuli or reward after probiotic supplementation have not been observed with conventional antidepressant therapies. Further studies are required to elucidate the significance of these changes with regard to the mood-improving action of the current probiotic.