-
1.
High phosphorus intake and gut-related parameters - results of a randomized placebo-controlled human intervention study.
Trautvetter, U, Camarinha-Silva, A, Jahreis, G, Lorkowski, S, Glei, M
Nutrition journal. 2018;17(1):23
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
It is known that calcium and phosphate form amorphous calcium phosphate in the small intestines, which can lead to various beneficial changes in the human gut. Currently it remains unclear whether dietary phosphorous influences serum phosphate concentrations. The aim of this study was to analyse the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of faecal water and faecal concentrations of short chain fatty acids in 62 healthy subjects. All participants received placebo for two weeks, and afterwards an intervention for eight weeks according to the assigned group of either 1000 mg/d phosphorus, 1000 mg/d phosphorus and 500 mg/d calcium and 1000 mg/d phosphorus and 1000 mg/d calcium. Faecal collection took place after the placebo period and after the eight-week intervention period. This study found that the high phosphorus supplementation did not affect the toxicity of faecal water, nor the faecal fat concentrations, independent of calcium. Based on these results, the authors conclude that this study provides first hints for a potential phosphorus-induced modulation of the gut community.
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, high phosphate intakes were discussed critically. In the small intestine, a part of the ingested phosphate and calcium precipitates to amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), which in turn can precipitate other intestinal substances, thus leading to a beneficial modulation of the intestinal environment. Therefore, we analysed faecal samples obtained from a human intervention study regarding gut-related parameters. METHODS Sixty-two healthy subjects (men, n = 30; women, n = 32) completed the double-blind, placebo-controlled and parallel designed study (mean age: 29 ± 7 years; mean BMI: 24 ± 3 kg/m2). Supplements were monosodium phosphate and calcium carbonate. During the first 2 weeks, all groups consumed a placebo sherbet powder, and afterwards a sherbet powder for 8 weeks according to the intervention group: P1000/Ca0 (1000 mg/d phosphorus), P1000/Ca500 (1000 mg/d phosphorus and 500 mg/d calcium) and P1000/Ca1000 (1000 mg/d phosphorus and 1000 mg/d calcium). After the placebo period and after 8 weeks of intervention faecal collections took place. We determined in faeces: short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) and fat as well as the composition of the microbiome (subgroup) and cyto- and genotoxicity of faecal water (FW). By questionnaire evaluation we examined tolerability of the used phosphorus supplement. RESULTS Faecal fat concentrations did not change significantly due to the interventions. Concentrations of faecal total SCFA and acetate were significantly higher after 8 weeks of P1000/Ca500 supplementation compared to the P1000/Ca0 supplementation. In men, faecal total SCFA and acetate concentrations were significantly higher after 8 weeks in the P1000/Ca1000 group compared to the P1000/Ca0 one. None of the interventions markedly affected cyto- and genotoxic activity of FW. Men of the P1000/Ca1000 intervention had a significantly different gut microbial community compared to the men of the P1000/Ca0 and P1000/Ca500 ones. The genus Clostridium XVIII was significantly more abundant in men of the P1000/Ca1000 intervention group compared to the other groups. Supplementations did not cause increased intestinal distress. CONCLUSIONS The used high phosphorus diet did not influence cyto- and genotoxicity of FW and the concentrations of faecal fat independent of calcium intake. Our study provides first hints for a potential phosphorus-induced modulation of the gut community and the faecal total SCFA content. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02095392 .
-
2.
Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 on carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: results of the impact of probiotics for reducing infections in veterans (IMPROVE) study.
Eggers, S, Barker, AK, Valentine, S, Hess, T, Duster, M, Safdar, N
BMC infectious diseases. 2018;18(1):129
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
The bacteria Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is found in the digestive tract, nostrils, mouth and armpits. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is responsible for several difficult-to-treat infections in humans. Probiotics are emerging as an alternative to antibiotics in preventing or treating bacterial infections. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 to reduce S. aureus at several different body sites. Participants in the study were mostly male, with an average age of 64 years, and all carriers of S. aureus in one or more body sites. Participants were organised into groups depending on whether S. aureus was found within the gastrointestinal tract (GI) or in other body sites (extra-GI), and given either L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or a placebo for four weeks. Subjects given the probiotic had 15% lower levels of S. aureus in their stool samples than those given the placebo at the end of the trial. They also had 73% reduced odds of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) presence, and 83% reduced odds of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample compared to the placebo group. No other sampling sites showed a significant difference in colonisation between the two groups. The authors concluded that use of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites. The results of the study support the use of this probiotic strain for reducing the population of S. aureus in the gut. Further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness of different probiotic strains and to compare probiotics with antibiotics in reducing S. aureus in other body sites.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Colonization by S. aureus increases the risk of infection. Little is known about decolonization strategies for S. aureus beyond antibiotics, however probiotics represent a promising alternative. A randomized controlled trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (L. rhamnosus) HN001 in reducing carriage of S. aureus at multiple body sites. METHODS One hundred thirteen subjects, positive for S. aureus carriage, were recruited from the William S. Middleton Memorial Medical Center, Madison, WI, USA, and randomized by initial site of colonization, either gastrointestinal (GI) or extra-GI, to 4-weeks of oral L. rhamnosus HN001 probiotic, or placebo. Nasal, oropharyngeal, and axillary/groin swabs were obtained, and serial blood and fecal samples were collected. Differences in prevalence of S. aureus carriage at the end of the 4-weeks of treatment were assessed. RESULTS The probiotic and placebo groups were similar in age, gender, and health history at baseline. S. aureus colonization within the stool samples of the extra-GI group was 15% lower in the probiotic than placebo group at the endpoint of the trial. Those in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group had 73% reduced odds (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07-0.98) of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus presence, and 83% reduced odds (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.73) of any S. aureus presence in the stool sample at endpoint. CONCLUSION Use of daily oral L. rhamnosus HN001 reduced odds of carriage of S. aureus in the GI tract, however it did not eradicate S. aureus from other body sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01321606 . Registered March 21, 2011.
-
3.
The effect of Clostridium butyricum on symptoms and fecal microbiota in diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Sun, YY, Li, M, Li, YY, Li, LX, Zhai, WZ, Wang, P, Yang, XX, Gu, X, Song, LJ, Li, Z, et al
Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):2964
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Clostridium butyricum (CB) is a probiotic with potential for treating Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS). This randomised controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CB in treating diarrhoea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) and analyse the faecal microbiota after treatment. The study was carried out in China. 200 patients with IBS-D were recruited and were given CB or a placebo for four weeks. Researchers looked at changes in IBS symptoms, quality of life, stool consistency and frequency. CB was effective in improving the overall IBS-D symptoms as well as quality of life and stool frequency, but not abdominal pain or bloating. The responder rates (percentage of participants that experienced a reduction of 50 or more points in the IBS symptom severity scale) were higher in CB compared with the placebo, especially for those with moderate to severe IBS symptoms. The faecal microbiota analysis showed changes in the microbial community after treating with CB, including a reduction in the genus Clostridium.
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder in gastrointestinal system and impairs the quality of life of the patients. Clostridium butyricum (CB) is a probiotics that has been used in several gastrointestinal diseases. The efficacy of CB in treating IBS is still unknown. This prospective, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CB in treating diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) and analyze the fecal microbiota after treatment. Two hundred patients with IBS-D were recruited and were given CB or placebo for 4 weeks. End points included change from baseline in IBS symptoms, quality of life, stool consistency and frequency. Compared with placebo, CB is effective in improving the overall IBS-D symptoms (-62.12 ± 74.00 vs. -40.74 ± 63.67, P = 0.038) as well as quality of life (7.232 ± 14.06 vs. 3.159 ± 11.73, P = 0.032) and stool frequency (-1.602 ± 1.416 vs. -1.086 ± 1.644, P = 0.035). The responder rates are found higher in CB compared with the placebo (44.76% vs. 30.53%, P = 0.042). The change in fecal microbiota was analyzed and function pathways of CB in treating IBS-D were predicted. In conclusion, CB improves overall symptoms, quality of life and stool frequency in IBS-D patients and is considered to be used as a probiotics in treating IBS-D clinically.
-
4.
Probiotic Bifidobacterium strains and galactooligosaccharides improve intestinal barrier function in obese adults but show no synergism when used together as synbiotics.
Krumbeck, JA, Rasmussen, HE, Hutkins, RW, Clarke, J, Shawron, K, Keshavarzian, A, Walter, J
Microbiome. 2018;6(1):121
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Numerous studies have established that the gut microbiota contributes to gastrointestinal health and this can also be achieved through dietary consumption of probiotics and prebiotics. Gut microbiota have also been associated in impacting the markers of metabolic diseases but not many studies are available. Henceforth on this basis this study, looked into the synergistic effects of administering prebiotic together with a select probiotic Bifidobacterium strain. The main objective of this study was to establish the synergistic effect of probiotics and prebiotics and compare their effects on microbiota composition. This study was a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical trial conducted on a total of 151 volunteers assigned to six treatments groups. The authors concluded that the synergistic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, and neither any significant effects on metabolic disease outcomes were observed within the six treatment groups. Although, the findings from this study clearly demonstrated that the pro and prebiotic components improved markers of colonic permeability, henceforth providing a rational for their use in gut microbiota health.
Abstract
BACKGROUND One way to improve both the ecological performance and functionality of probiotic bacteria is by combining them with a prebiotic in the form of a synbiotic. However, the degree to which such synbiotic formulations improve probiotic strain functionality in humans has not been tested systematically. Our goal was to use a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm clinical trial in obese humans to compare the ecological and physiological impact of the prebiotic galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and the probiotic strains Bifidobacterium adolescentis IVS-1 (autochthonous and selected via in vivo selection) and Bifidobacterium lactis BB-12 (commercial probiotic allochthonous to the human gut) when used on their own or as synbiotic combinations. After 3 weeks of consumption, strain-specific quantitative real-time PCR and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed on fecal samples to assess changes in the microbiota. Intestinal permeability was determined by measuring sugar recovery in urine by GC after consumption of a sugar mixture. Serum-based endotoxin exposure was also assessed. RESULTS IVS-1 reached significantly higher cell numbers in fecal samples than BB-12 (P < 0.01) and, remarkably, its administration induced an increase in total bifidobacteria that was comparable to that of GOS. Although GOS showed a clear bifidogenic effect on the resident gut microbiota, both probiotic strains showed only a non-significant trend of higher fecal cell numbers when administered with GOS. Post-aspirin sucralose:lactulose ratios were reduced in groups IVS-1 (P = 0.050), IVS-1 + GOS (P = 0.022), and GOS (P = 0.010), while sucralose excretion was reduced with BB-12 (P = 0.002) and GOS (P = 0.020), indicating improvements in colonic permeability but no synergistic effects. No changes in markers of endotoxemia were observed. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that "autochthony" of the probiotic strain has a larger effect on ecological performance than the provision of a prebiotic substrate, likely due to competitive interactions with members of the resident microbiota. Although the synbiotic combinations tested in this study did not demonstrate functional synergism, our findings clearly showed that the pro- and prebiotic components by themselves improved markers of colonic permeability, providing a rational for their use in pathologies with an underlying leakiness of the gut.
-
5.
Effect of a Protein Supplement on the Gut Microbiota of Endurance Athletes: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Pilot Study.
Moreno-Pérez, D, Bressa, C, Bailén, M, Hamed-Bousdar, S, Naclerio, F, Carmona, M, Pérez, M, González-Soltero, R, Montalvo-Lominchar, MG, Carabaña, C, et al
Nutrients. 2018;10(3)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Protein supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and increase muscle mass. However, their effect on other aspects of health is less well known. Dietary changes can affect gut microbiota balance, with beneficial or harmful consequences for the host. This small pilot study was performed on cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) or maltodextrin (control) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analysed in faecal samples, and oxidative stress markers were measured in blood plasma and urine. Faecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these metabolites of fermentation. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels. Protein supplementation did however increase the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decrease the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. The authors concluded that long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- Long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota.
- Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota and whether there is a differential impact between protein from animal and plant sources.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
This is a very interesting study that is relevant to athletic populations.
Clinical practice applications:
Potentially there is a role for probiotics / prebiotics when increasing protein intake (particularly of animal origin) to maintain microbiota diversity and prevent ensuing health complications.
Considerations for future research:
Further, larger scale, research is needed to understand whether the same effect of protein supplementation would be seen with plant-based proteins or whether this is unique to animal based protein supplementation. For example, is the hydrolysation of the proteins to account for the largest effect or could a whole food protein, i.e. not hydrolysed, elicit the same effects?
Also, is this effect seen in other sports, e.g. non-endurance. What about the effect under different conditions e.g. energy deficit vs. energy excess?
Abstract
Nutritional supplements are popular among athletes to improve performance and physical recovery. Protein supplements fulfill this function by improving performance and increasing muscle mass; however, their effect on other organs or systems is less well known. Diet alterations can induce gut microbiota imbalance, with beneficial or deleterious consequences for the host. To test this, we performed a randomized pilot study in cross-country runners whose diets were complemented with a protein supplement (whey isolate and beef hydrolysate) (n = 12) or maltodextrin (control) (n = 12) for 10 weeks. Microbiota, water content, pH, ammonia, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were analyzed in fecal samples, whereas malondialdehyde levels (oxidative stress marker) were determined in plasma and urine. Fecal pH, water content, ammonia, and SCFA concentrations did not change, indicating that protein supplementation did not increase the presence of these fermentation-derived metabolites. Similarly, it had no impact on plasma or urine malondialdehyde levels; however, it increased the abundance of the Bacteroidetes phylum and decreased the presence of health-related taxa including Roseburia, Blautia, and Bifidobacterium longum. Thus, long-term protein supplementation may have a negative impact on gut microbiota. Further research is needed to establish the impact of protein supplements on gut microbiota.
-
6.
A Walnut-Enriched Diet Affects Gut Microbiome in Healthy Caucasian Subjects: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.
Bamberger, C, Rossmeier, A, Lechner, K, Wu, L, Waldmann, E, Fischer, S, Stark, RG, Altenhofer, J, Henze, K, Parhofer, KG
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
There is a clear link between health, disease and the diversity of the human gut microbiome. Diet is one of the main factors that influences microbial composition in the gut. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of walnut consumption on the gut microbiome composition and microbial diversity. 194 healthy adults, of average age 63 years, were included in this study. Participants were allocated to two diet phases of eight weeks each. 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43g walnuts/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, participants were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Faecal samples were collected at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. Walnut consumption significantly affected microbiome composition and diversity. The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly while Clostridium species decreased significantly after walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. The authors concluded that daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals.
Abstract
Regular walnut consumption is associated with better health. We have previously shown that eight weeks of walnut consumption (43 g/day) significantly improves lipids in healthy subjects. In the same study, gut microbiome was evaluated. We included 194 healthy subjects (134 females, 63 ± 7 years, BMI 25.1 ± 4.0 kg/m²) in a randomized, controlled, prospective, cross-over study. Following a nut-free run-in period, subjects were randomized to two diet phases (eight weeks each); 96 subjects first followed a walnut-enriched diet (43 g/day) and then switched to a nut-free diet, while 98 subjects followed the diets in reverse order. While consuming the walnut-enriched diet, subjects were advised to either reduce fat or carbohydrates or both to account for the additional calories. Fecal samples were collected from 135 subjects at the end of the walnut-diet and the control-diet period for microbiome analyses. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing data was clustered with a 97% similarity into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). UniFrac distances were used to determine diversity between groups. Differential abundance was evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. All analyses were performed using Rhea. Generalized UniFrac distance shows that walnut consumption significantly affects microbiome composition and diversity. Multidimensional scaling (metric and non-metric) indicates dissimilarities of approximately 5% between walnut and control (p = 0.02). The abundance of Ruminococcaceae and Bifidobacteria increased significantly (p < 0.02) while Clostridium sp. cluster XIVa species (Blautia; Anaerostipes) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) during walnut consumption. The effect of walnut consumption on the microbiome only marginally depended on whether subjects replaced fat, carbohydrates or both while on walnuts. Daily intake of 43 g walnuts over eight weeks significantly affects the gut microbiome by enhancing probiotic- and butyric acid-producing species in healthy individuals. Further evaluation is required to establish whether these changes are preserved during longer walnut consumption and how these are linked to the observed changes in lipid metabolism.
-
7.
Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve Fermented Milk in Maintaining Remission of Ulcerative Colitis.
Matsuoka, K, Uemura, Y, Kanai, T, Kunisaki, R, Suzuki, Y, Yokoyama, K, Yoshimura, N, Hibi, T
Digestive diseases and sciences. 2018;63(7):1910-1919
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Fermented milk products may improve symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of this B-FLORA study was to assess the ability of a fermented milk product (‘Mil-Mil’) containing Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult (BFM) to maintain remission in Japanese patients with UC. The study enrolled 195 patients with UC in remission, who were randomised to receive one pack of fermented milk (containing 10 billion BFM and 1 billion Lactobacillus acidophilus) per day, or a placebo, for 48 weeks. Time to relapse was not significantly different between the BFM and placebo groups, neither was the incidence of relapse. Stool samples from a subgroup of patients revealed no changes in the intestinal microbiota in either group, but there was a significant decrease in Bifidobacterium species before relapse, regardless of treatment group. The authors concluded that BFM had no effect on time to relapse in UC patients compared with placebo. Future studies should compare the effects of different probiotics, doses and delivery modes, and consider specific patient populations and disease severity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fermented milk products containing Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult (BFM) may improve clinical status in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. AIMS To assess efficacy of BFM in maintaining remission in Japanese patients with quiescent UC. METHODS This double-blind study (B-FLORA) enrolled 195 patients with quiescent UC, randomized to receive one pack of BFM fermented milk per day [Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult (10 billion bacteria) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (1 billion bacteria)] (n = 98) or matching placebo (n = 97) for 48 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was relapse-free survival (relapse: rectal bleeding score ≥ 2 on Sutherland disease activity index scale for 3 consecutive days and/or initiation of remission induction therapy for worsening of UC). RESULTS An interim analysis was conducted after inclusion and follow-up of one-third of patients for the first phase of the study (n = 195). Relapse-free survival was not significantly different between the BFM and placebo groups (P = 0.643; hazard ratio 1.16; 95% CI 0.63-2.14, log-rank test), nor was the incidence of relapse. Therefore, the study was discontinued for lack of efficacy. An exploratory analysis of fecal samples from a subgroup of patients revealed no effects of either study beverage on intestinal microbiota, but there was a significant decrease in Bifidobacterium species before relapse, regardless of treatment group. Three mild adverse events occurred for which a causal relationship with the study beverage could not be ruled out (placebo: abdominal bloating and stress in one patient; BFM: body odor in one patient). CONCLUSIONS BFM had no effect on time to relapse in UC patients compared with placebo. STUDY REGISTRATION UMIN000007593.
-
8.
The Effect of Oligofructose-Enriched Inulin on Faecal Bacterial Counts and Microbiota-Associated Characteristics in Celiac Disease Children Following a Gluten-Free Diet: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Drabińska, N, Jarocka-Cyrta, E, Markiewicz, LH, Krupa-Kozak, U
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Coeliac disease (CD) is associated with changes in the gut microbiome. Prebiotics, that feed beneficial bacteria, are a promising method of restoring normal gut function in those with CD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prebiotics on the intestinal microbiota in children with CD. The researchers looked at a group of 34 children of average age 10 years. The children had all been diagnosed with CD and were following a gluten-free diet. The children were given either a supplement of oligofructose-enriched inulin or a placebo (maltodextrin) daily for 3 months. At the end of the study, Bifidobacterium count increased significantly in the group of children given the prebiotic. Faecal acetate and butyrate levels also increased in the prebiotic group, with total short-chain fatty acid levels increasing by 31% compared to the start of the study. Constipation or diarrhoea was reported by only 5% of the prebiotic group, compared to 31% of the placebo group. The authors concluded that the prebiotic supplement used in this trial had a beneficial effect on the characteristics of faecal microbiota in children with CD on a gluten-free diet.
Abstract
Celiac disease (CD) is associated with intestinal microbiota alterations. The administration of prebiotics could be a promising method of restoring gut homeostasis in CD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prolonged oligofructose-enriched inulin (Synergy 1) administration on the characteristics and metabolism of intestinal microbiota in CD children following a gluten-free diet (GFD). Thirty-four paediatric CD patients (mean age 10 years; 62% females) on a GFD were randomized into two experimental groups receiving Synergy 1 (10 g/day) or placebo (maltodextrin; 7 g/day) for 3 months. The quantitative gut microbiota characteristics and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentration were analysed. In addition, side effects were monitored. Generally, the administration of Synergy 1 in a GFD did not cause any side effects. After the intervention period, Bifidobacterium count increased significantly (p < 0.05) in the Synergy 1 group. Moreover, an increase in faecal acetate and butyrate levels was observed in the prebiotic group. Consequently, total SCFA levels were 31% higher than at the baseline. The presented trial shows that Synergy 1 applied as a supplement of a GFD had a moderate effect on the qualitative characteristics of faecal microbiota, whereas it stimulated the bacterial metabolite production in CD children.
-
9.
Almond Consumption and Processing Affects the Composition of the Gastrointestinal Microbiota of Healthy Adult Men and Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Holscher, HD, Taylor, AM, Swanson, KS, Novotny, JA, Baer, DJ
Nutrients. 2018;10(2)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Poor diet is recognised as a contributing factor to the development of common diseases, such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity. Increasingly, links are being made between the health and diversity of the human intestinal microbiome (the bacteria resident in our gut) and these chronic metabolic disorders. The microbiome is constantly changing, depending on a number of factors, including dietary intake. This small cross-over study of 18 participants, included five three-week diet periods of almonds in varying forms, with a one week break (wash out) between diets. The diets were 1. No almonds; 2. 42g whole almonds daily; 3. 42g whole roasted almonds daily; 4. 42g roasted, chopped almonds daily and 5. 42g of almond nut butter. Using stool samples at the end of each diet period, the results showed that chopped almond consumption increased the relative abundance of 3 bacteria strains (Lachnospira, Roseburia and Oscillospira) compared to the no almonds control group, while whole almonds increased the Dialister bacteria strain compared to control. There were no differences between the almond nut butter and control. The authors conclude that consumption of almonds affects the intestinal bacteria profile, which differs with the form of almonds eaten. Whilst this is a small study, Nutrition Practitioners should be aware of the ability to manipulate the gut microbiome with targeted dietary changes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almond processing has been shown to differentially impact metabolizable energy; however, the effect of food form on the gastrointestinal microbiota is under-investigated. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the interrelationship of almond consumption and processing on the gastrointestinal microbiota. DESIGN A controlled-feeding, randomized, five-period, crossover study with washouts between diet periods was conducted in healthy adults (n = 18). Treatments included: (1) zero servings/day of almonds (control); (2) 1.5 servings (42 g)/day of whole almonds; (3) 1.5 servings/day of whole, roasted almonds; (4) 1.5 servings/day of roasted, chopped almonds; and (5) 1.5 servings/day of almond butter. Fecal samples were collected at the end of each three-week diet period. RESULTS Almond consumption increased the relative abundances of Lachnospira, Roseburia, and Dialister (p ≤ 0.05). Comparisons between control and the four almond treatments revealed that chopped almonds increased Lachnospira, Roseburia, and Oscillospira compared to control (p < 0.05), while whole almonds increased Dialister compared to control (p = 0.007). There were no differences between almond butter and control. CONCLUSIONS These results reveal that almond consumption induced changes in the microbial community composition of the human gastrointestinal microbiota. Furthermore, the degree of almond processing (e.g., roasting, chopping, and grinding into butter) differentially impacted the relative abundances of bacterial genera.
-
10.
Intermittent Fasting Confers Protection in CNS Autoimmunity by Altering the Gut Microbiota.
Cignarella, F, Cantoni, C, Ghezzi, L, Salter, A, Dorsett, Y, Chen, L, Phillips, D, Weinstock, GM, Fontana, L, Cross, AH, et al
Cell metabolism. 2018;27(6):1222-1235.e6
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Calorie restriction (CR) has potent anti-inflammatory effects and has shown beneficial effects in an animal model for Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Intermittent Fasting (IF) has similar effects as CR and may be more acceptable long term than CR. This paper reports results from both an animal study and a pilot randomised controlled human clinical trial on IF and MS. The animal study showed that IF had beneficial effects on the MS animal model and that these effects were at least in part mediated by changes in the gut microbiome. 16 patients with relapsing remitting MS were enrolled during a relapse and randomised to either IF (6-7 fasting days during the two-week study) or normal eating. Changes in immune inflammatory parameters and gut flora were seen in the IF group which were similar to the beneficial changes in the animal model. The authors conclude that larger clinical studies to test IF and microbiome manipulation as a potential treatment in MS are warranted.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is more common in western countries with diet being a potential contributing factor. Here we show that intermittent fasting (IF) ameliorated clinical course and pathology of the MS model, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). IF led to increased gut bacteria richness, enrichment of the Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Prevotellaceae families and enhanced antioxidative microbial metabolic pathways. IF altered T cells in the gut with a reduction of IL-17 producing T cells and an increase in regulatory T cells. Fecal microbiome transplantation from mice on IF ameliorated EAE in immunized recipient mice on a normal diet, suggesting that IF effects are at least partially mediated by the gut flora. In a pilot clinical trial in MS patients, intermittent energy restriction altered blood adipokines and the gut flora resembling protective changes observed in mice. In conclusion, IF has potent immunomodulatory effects that are at least partially mediated by the gut microbiome.