1.
Absence of Effects of L-Arginine and L-Citrulline on Inflammatory Biomarkers and Oxidative Stress in Response to Physical Exercise: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Porto, AA, Gonzaga, LA, Benjamim, CJR, Valenti, VE
Nutrients. 2023;15(8)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
L-citrulline is a non-essential amino acid that acts as a precursor to L-arginine. L-arginine is a semi-essential amino acid used for nitric oxide production which is crucial for maintaining physiological function and immune regulation. Previous research has shown that L-citrulline and L-arginine supplementation may offer antioxidant and anti-inflammatory benefits in reducing exercise-related oxidative stress and inflammation. This systematic review and meta-analysis included seven randomised controlled trials to investigate the effect of L-citrulline and L-arginine on antioxidants, oxidative stress, and inflammatory and anti-inflammatory markers. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant improvements in oxidative stress and inflammation followed by the supplementation of L-citrulline and L-arginine before exercise. However, further robust studies that include different dosages and exercise intensities are required to assess the beneficial effects of L-citrulline and L-arginine supplements to support physical exercise-induced oxidative stress and inflammation due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. Healthcare professionals can use the results of this study to understand the potential benefits of L-citrulline and L-arginine supplementation in people prone to producing proinflammatory cytokines.
Abstract
The repercussions on oxidative and inflammatory stress markers under the effects of arginine and citrulline in response to exercise are not fully reached. We completed a systematic review to investigate the effects of L-Citrulline or L-Arginine on oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers following exercise. EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, CINAHL, LILACS, and Web of Science databases were used to record the trials. This study includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs with subjects over 18 years old. Those under the intervention protocol consumed L-Citrulline or L-Arginine, and the controls ingested placebo. We recognized 1080 studies, but only 7 were included (7 studies in meta-analysis). We observed no difference between pre- vs. post-exercise for oxidative stress (subtotal = -0.21 [CI: -0.56, 0.14], p = 0.24, and heterogeneity = 0%. In the sub-group "L-Arginine" we found a subtotal = -0.29 [-0.71, 0.12], p = 0.16, and heterogeneity = 0%. For the "L-Citrulline" subgroup we observed a subtotal = 0.00 [-0.67, 0.67], p = 1.00, and heterogeneity was not applicable. No differences were observed between groups (p = 0.47), and I² = 0%) or in antioxidant activity (subtotal = -0.28 [-1.65, 1.08], p = 0.68, and heterogeneity = 0%). In the "L-Arginine" sub-group, we found a subtotal = -3.90 [-14.18, 6.38], p = 0.46, and heterogeneity was not applicable. For the "L-Citrulline" subgroup, we reported a subtotal = -0.22 [-1.60, 1.16], p = 0.75, and heterogeneity was not applicable. No differences were observed between groups (p = 0.49), and I² = 0%), inflammatory markers (subtotal = 8.38 [-0.02, 16.78], p = 0.05, and heterogeneity = 93%. Tests for subgroup differences were not applicable, and anti-inflammatory markers (subtotal = -0.38 [-1.15, 0.39], p = 0.34 and heterogeneity = 15%; testing for subgroup differences was not applicable). In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis found that L-Citrulline and L-Arginine did not influence inflammatory biomarkers and oxidative stress after exercise.
2.
Resistance Training Prevents Muscle Loss Induced by Caloric Restriction in Obese Elderly Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sardeli, AV, Komatsu, TR, Mori, MA, Gáspari, AF, Chacon-Mikahil, MPT
Nutrients. 2018;10(4)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Caloric restriction (55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, 30% fat) is associated with increased lifespans and the attenuation of the harmful effects of aging. Furthermore, it has been shown that resistance training increases lean body mass, promotes strength, and attenuates muscle loss and function in elderly people. The aim of the study is to determine the level of lean body mass that can be preserved when resistance training is associated with caloric restriction interventions in elderly obese humans. The study is a meta-analysis, based on data from randomised-controlled trials. The participants were older adults or elderly people with a mean age > 57 year. Results indicate that caloric restriction associated with resistance training prevents 93% lean body mass loss induced by caloric restriction. Authors conclude that caloric restriction with resistance training almost stopped caloric restriction induced lean body mass loss completely.
Abstract
It remains unclear as to what extent resistance training (RT) can attenuate muscle loss during caloric restriction (CR) interventions in humans. The objective here is to address if RT could attenuate muscle loss induced by CR in obese elderly individuals, through summarized effects of previous studies. Databases MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were used to perform a systematic search between July and August 2017. Were included in the review randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing the effects of CR with (CRRT) or without RT on lean body mass (LBM), fat body mass (FBM), and total body mass (BM), measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, on obese elderly individuals. The six RCTs included in the review applied RT three times per week, for 12 to 24 weeks, and most CR interventions followed diets of 55% carbohydrate, 15% protein, and 30% fat. RT reduced 93.5% of CR-induced LBM loss (0.819 kg [0.364 to 1.273]), with similar reduction in FBM and BM, compared with CR. Furthermore, to address muscle quality, the change in strength/LBM ratio tended to be different (p = 0.07) following CRRT (20.9 ± 23.1%) and CR interventions (−7.5 ± 9.9%). Our conclusion is that CRRT is able to prevent almost 100% of CR-induced muscle loss, while resulting in FBM and BM reductions that do not significantly differ from CR.