1.
The Efficacy of Self-Management Strategies for Females with Endometriosis: a Systematic Review.
Mardon, AK, Leake, HB, Hayles, C, Henry, ML, Neumann, PB, Moseley, GL, Chalmers, KJ
Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.). 2023;30(2):390-407
-
-
-
-
Free full text
-
Plain language summary
Endometriosis is a gynaecological condition with symptoms of pelvic pain, fatigue, and stress. Decreased quality of life, impaired fertility and hinderances to carry out day to day tasks are all associated with endometriosis. Treatment options involve medications and surgery; however, both are associated with poorer outcomes than the initial disease itself. Self-management strategies that the individual can perform themselves, such as lifestyle changes, meditation, and rest have all been used to improve the quality of life of individuals with endometriosis, however their effectiveness has not been determined. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of self-management strategies for the management of endometriosis. The study showed that many self-management strategies were no more effective than placebo or hormonal therapies for the management of endometriosis. It was concluded that many self-management strategies were no more effective than hormonal treatment at reducing endometriosis symptoms and the studies that did show a benefit were insufficient to base recommendations on due to poor design. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand that currently the research on self-management strategies of endometriosis is poor and whilst some may be of benefit to individuals who cannot or do not want to take hormone therapy, more research is warranted.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
It is not possible to generalise the findings of this systematic review for the self-management of endometriosis due to the poor quality of evidence. Further studies of higher quality are needed.
Evidence Category:
-
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
X
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
Endometriosis is an inflammatory condition where endometrial-like tissue is found outside of the uterus. Diagnosis of endometriosis is made in around 6-10% of females of reproductive age. Endometriosis can adversely affect fertility, psychological well being and quality of life (QoL). Conventional interventions can have side effects and limited effectiveness. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to evaluate the efficacy of self-management interventions for pain-related symptoms and QoL.
Methods
Fifteen experimental studies were included in this SR. Ten evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter (OTC) medication, and one evaluated exercise. Outcome measures were self-reported for dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, overall pain, non-menstrual pelvic pain, use of medications and QoL.
Results
- Most dietary supplements were no more effective than placebo or frequently recommended medical interventions, at reducing pain-related outcomes.
- Melatonin (one RCT n=30) performed better than placebo for managing dysmenorrhoea and overall pain but not for non-menstrual pelvic pain. PEA-transploydatin (one RCT n=20) performed better than placebo for dysmenorrhoea and non-menstrual pelvic pain but not better than medical intervention.
- Resveratrol (one RCT n=22 & one intervention study n=12) plus the oral contraceptive pill (OCP) was more effective than the OCP alone for managing dysmenorrhoea.
- In one observational study, 75% of participants (n=295) reported a reduction in ‘high’ intensity pain scores following a 12-month gluten-free diet (p- value =<0.005). Similarly, a full dietary modification (one non randomised controlled trial , n=30) found less participants reporting pain at ‘high intensity’ (18%) compared to linseed and calcium oil supplements (41%) and placebo (62%).
- A metal trace element supplement was more effective than placebo for managing overall pain (one RCT p- value<0.001).
- Naproxen (one cross over trial, n=11) performed better than placebo at managing dysmenorrhoea (83% vs 41%, p- value 0.008).
- Hatha yoga (one RCT n=12) was found to be effective at reducing overall pain and improving QoL compared to no yoga (p-value <0.05).
Conclusion
Due to limited, low-quality evidence, high risk of bias and high levels of heterogeneity between studies, it was not possible to generalise the findings of the studies included in this systematic review. Further research of high-quality is needed in order to make self-management recommendations for females with endometriosis.
Notes: The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
Clinical practice applications:
Evidence-based self-management interventions are considered critical for the management of endometriosis. However, the quality of evidence in this SR was considered of poor quality. Further high-quality research is needed in order to be able to make recommendations. Strategies that showed potential benefits included:
- Dietary modifications and a gluten-free diet may be effective for reducing the intensity of pain associated with endometriosis.
- Hatha yoga may be effective at reducing overall pain and supporting psychological wellbeing and QoL.
Considerations for future research:
High quality studies are needed as well as a ‘gold standard’ definition for self-management criteria. Understanding potential barriers to self-management interventions may also be beneficial.
Abstract
Self-management is critical for the care of endometriosis. Females with endometriosis frequently use self-management strategies to manage associated symptoms; however, the efficacy of such strategies is unknown. The aim of this review was to systematically appraise the evidence concerning efficacy of self-management strategies for endometriosis symptoms. Electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched from inception to March 2021. We included peer-reviewed experimental studies published in English evaluating the efficacy of self-management strategies in human females laparoscopically diagnosed with endometriosis. Studies underwent screening, data extraction, and risk of bias appraisal (randomised studies: Risk of Bias 2 tool; non-randomised studies: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions tool). Of the fifteen studies included, 10 evaluated dietary supplements, three evaluated dietary modifications, one evaluated over-the-counter medication, and one evaluated exercise. Most studies had a high-critical risk of bias. Many self-management strategies were not more effective at reducing endometriosis symptoms compared to placebo or hormonal therapies. Where studies suggest efficacy for self-management strategies, no recommendations can be made due to the poor quality and heterogeneity of evidence. High-quality empirical evidence is required to investigate the efficacy of self-management strategies for females with endometriosis.
2.
Effects of Probiotics in Adults with Gastroenteritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.
Mitra, AK, Asala, AF, Malone, S, Mridha, MK
Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;11(4)
-
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Gastroenteritis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality globally and symptoms can range from mild to life-threatening. Some studies have suggested benefits of probiotics in the treatment of gastroenteritis in children whilst in adults, results are inconsistent. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of probiotics on acute and chronic gastroenteritis in adults. 35 clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 22 in the meta-analysis. Of these, 23 dealt with inflammatory bowel disease, 5 with pouchitis, 3 with antibiotic-induced diarrhoea, 2 with Helicobacter pylori infection and one each with diverticulitis and acute watery diarrhoea. 27 (77%) of studies showed some benefits of probiotic administration. The meta-analysis of 22 studies did not show a statistically significant benefit of probiotics. Although statistical analysis showed the studies to be homogenous, the authors point out that studies differed widely in aetiologies and probiotics used. A subgroup analysis of 8 studies in patients with ulcerative colitis also showed no benefit. In all studies, probiotics were well tolerated and no adverse side effects were reported. The authors concluded that further research is needed to help identify the most appropriate use of probiotics for the different types of gastroenteritis.
Expert Review
Conflicts of interest:
None
Take Home Message:
- For chronic inflammatory gastroenteritis conditions in adults, probiotics were effective in treating and preventing relapse
- In ulcerative colitis, probiotics were not effective and adverse events outweighed the benefits
- No safety concerns were found for probiotic use in any studies
- Aetiologies, disease severity and duration as well as the type of probiotics used were widely diverse.
Evidence Category:
-
X
A: Meta-analyses, position-stands, randomized-controlled trials (RCTs)
-
B: Systematic reviews including RCTs of limited number
-
C: Non-randomized trials, observational studies, narrative reviews
-
D: Case-reports, evidence-based clinical findings
-
E: Opinion piece, other
Summary Review:
Introduction
To date, evidence has been mixed for probiotic effectiveness in gastrointestinal syndromes associated with gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to review current evidence on the effect of probiotics on gastroenteritis in adults.
Methods
This was a systematic review (n=35; total sample size 4577, median 44) and meta-analysis (n=22) of randomised controlled trials. Quality was assessed using CADIMA as per a rating scale (0 to 4) and standards of critical appraisal.
Results
All 35 studies on gastroenteritis included participants with chronic diarrhoea of diverse aetiologies such as IBD, antibiotic-associated, except one which had acute watery diarrhoea.
51% (n=18) of studies assessed the effects of probiotics in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). 60% (n=21) used multiple strains of probiotics while the rest used single strains. Lactobacilli, Bifidobacteria, Escherichia and Streptococcus were the most common and only a few studies administered probiotics with another conventional treatment.
19 studies (55%) rated highly in terms of quality while 15 (43%) scored moderately. The majority (63%) of the 27 studies where probiotics were shown to be effective were of high quality.
Systematic review results:
- 27/53 studies (77%) showed a favourable response after using probiotics (resolution, improvement, remission or no relapse), mostly in patients with IBDs
- 7 studies (20%) found probiotics to be ineffective
- 1 study was inconclusive
- Multiple strain probiotics (VSL #3) was found to be most effective in IBD
- All administered probiotics were well tolerated with no adverse side effects although caution in immunocompromised patients was mentioned in several studies.
The meta-analysis results:
- Overall effectiveness for 22 studies (p=0.37) highlighted there was not enough evidence that the intervention was more protective than controls.
- Probiotics were not effective in UC (p = 0.28), and adverse events caused by probiotics may outweigh the benefits in studies with UC patients.
Conclusion
While benefits of effectiveness were found for probiotic use in gastroenteritis in adults, results from the systematic review and meta-analysis showed a mixed effect.
Clinical practice applications:
- Based on the systematic review, probiotics may be an effective treatment or adjuvant treatment for gastroenteritis but ineffective for around 20% of patients
- It is worth noting that combined therapy with standard treatment showed effective results
- Beneficial effects of probiotics in other key clinical outcomes including disease prevention, relapse, quality of life, morbidity were found
- While the results are interesting it is difficult to apply them in practice as the type of probiotics used were widely different as were the causes, severity and duration of gastroenteritis.
Considerations for future research:
- Further and larger studies would be beneficial to understand the benefits of probiotics in terms of single therapy or in combination with standard treatment particularly for UC, CDs, gastroenteritis not due to viral infection
- Individual-level data instead of aggregated data could give a better idea of effectiveness of probiotics in the future
- In this study aetiologies and the type, dosage, duration of probiotics used were widely diverse therefore systematic reviews and meta-analysis on specific conditions, specific probiotic strains and combinations would be beneficial.
Abstract
Probiotics have been widely used in gastroenteritis due to acute and chronic illnesses. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness of probiotics in different health conditions is inconclusive and conflicting. The aim of this study was to review the existing literature on the effects of probiotics on gastroenteritis among adults. Only original articles on clinical trials that demonstrated the effects of probiotics in adults with gastroenteritis were used for this analysis. Multiple databases, such as PubMed, Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Scopus databases, were searched for the data. The study followed standard procedures for data extraction using a PRISMA flow chart. A quality appraisal of the selected studies was conducted using CADIMA. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed. Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria; of them, probiotics were found effective in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in 17 (49%), and the treatment of pouchitis in 4 (11.4%), antibiotic-induced diarrhea in 3 (8.6%), Helicobacter pylori infection in 2 (5.7%) and diverticulitis in 1 (2.9%), while the remaining 7 (20%) were ineffective, and 1 study's results were inconclusive. The meta-analysis did not demonstrate any significant protective effects of probiotics. Having a τ2 value of zero and I2 of 6%, the studies were homogeneous and had minimum variances. Further studies are suggested to evaluate the beneficial effects of probiotics in IBDs and other chronic bowel diseases.