0
selected
-
1.
Effect of a family and interdisciplinary intervention to prevent T2D: randomized clinical trial.
Vargas-Ortiz, K, Lira-Mendiola, G, Gómez-Navarro, CM, Padilla-Estrada, K, Angulo-Romero, F, Hernández-Márquez, JM, Villa-Martínez, AK, González-Mena, JN, Macías-Cervantes, MH, Reyes-Escogido, ML, et al
BMC public health. 2020;20(1):97
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
In individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions rather than medication have been more successful in preventing development of the disease, however the benefits of lifestyle strategies diminishes over time due to possible adherence issues. Prolonged lifestyle changes may be affected by lack of family support, but research on family support during lifestyle changes in individuals prior to diabetes is lacking. This parallel randomised control trial of 122 patients with prediabetes and 101 of their family members aimed to assess the impact of family supported diet and exercise changes compared to self-motivation on individuals with prediabetes. At 6 months, body measurements and markers of prediabetes improved in both groups. Lipids were significantly improved in the group with family support compared to having no support. At 12 months there were a high number of dropouts due to lack of patient interest. Benefits shown at 6 months in both groups were only maintained or improved upon with family support and the lipid profile of the individual intervention group actually worsened in comparison to when participants entered the trial. After 12 months the incidence rate of type 2 diabetes was similar in both groups. Individuals with prediabetes who had family support whilst undergoing a diet and exercise regime were more successful at maintaining improvements of factors contributing to diabetes, compared to individuals without support. However this did not affect the occurrence of type 2 diabetes. Clinicians could use this paper to communicate the importance of family support during lifestyle changes in patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, although close monitoring may be required to ensure compliance.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lifestyle changes can reduce the risk of T2D; however, no study has evaluated the effect of a lifestyle intervention involving patients´ family. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of an interdisciplinary family (FI) Vs individual intervention (II) on glucose metabolism, insulin resistance (IR), pancreatic β-cell function and cardiovascular risk markers in patients with prediabetes, as well as to measure the impact on their families' metabolic risk. METHODS Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) to compare the impact of FI and II on IR and pancreatic β-cell function in subjects with prediabetes. There were 122 subjects with prediabetes (and 101 family members) randomized to FI or II. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017-2018. FI group had the support of their family members, who also received personalized diet and exercise recommendations; patients and their family members attended monthly a lifestyle enhancement program. II group received personalized diet and exercise recommendations. The follow-up was for 12 months. Glucose, IR, pancreatic β-cell function and secondary outcomes (body composition and lipid profile) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS FI group improved area under the glucose curve (AUC) (from 18,597 ± 2611 to 17,237 ± 2792, p = 0.004) and the Matsuda index (from 3.5 ± 2.3 to 4.7 ± 3.5, p = 0.05) at 12 months. II group improved Disposition Index (from 1.5 ± 0.4 to 1.9 ± 0.73, p < .0001) at 12 months. The improvements achieved in weight and lipids at 6 months, were lost in II group at 12 moths, whereas in FI persisted. Adherence up to 12 months was not different between the study groups (FI 56% Vs II 60%). CONCLUSIONS FI intervention was more effective by improving glucose AUC, insulin sensitivity and lipid profile, besides that, metabolic risk in family members of the FI group was maintained, while the risk of II group was increased. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was retrospectively registered at clinicaltrials.gov on December 15, 2015 (NTC026365646).
-
2.
Long-term effects of a three-component lifestyle intervention on emotional well-being in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Jiskoot, G, Dietz de Loos, A, Beerthuizen, A, Timman, R, Busschbach, J, Laven, J
PloS one. 2020;15(6):e0233876
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder affecting women in their reproductive years. The condition is often associated with higher rates of depression and anxiety, particularly with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of >30. As weight-loss has shown to improve a host of symptoms experienced in PCOS, the authors sought to investigate whether weight-loss would also lead to a reduction in depressive symptoms. This secondary analysis of a longitudinal, randomised trial of 155 women, compared a combined lifestyle intervention of diet advice, eating behaviour, exercise and standardised Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) to standard advice for weight reduction. Over a 12-months the chosen lifestyle interventions demonstrated a sustained improvement in self-assessed depression scores, though independent of weight-loss. However, weight-loss itself was closely linked with improved body image and self-esteem. Additional monitoring of hormones (androgens, insulin, cortisol) and calculations for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR ) did not show any direct link with depressive scores. This study affirms the benefit of integrative lifestyle approaches on emotional well-being in women with PCOS. Practitioners might find it of interest that improvements in emotional well-being can occur independent of weight loss in individuals experiencing depressive symptoms with PCOS.
Abstract
Many women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) report high depression rates. The relationship between PCOS and these high depression rates is unclear. Two-component lifestyle interventions have revealed short-term effects on depression scores in this group of women. In general, 3-component interventions including diet, exercise, and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are more effective in the long-term to improve emotional well-being. This has not yet been studied in women with PCOS. This study examined the effect of 20 CBT lifestyle (LS) sessions combined with a healthy diet and physical therapy with or without 9 months additional feedback through Short Message Service (SMS) via mobile phone, compared to care as usual (CAU, involving advice to lose weight). In this secondary analysis, 155 women with PCOS and a BMI above 25 kg/m2 were eligible. Depression scores decreased significantly in the LS programme compared to CAU (P = 0.045). In both the LS programme without SMS (P = 0.036) and the LS programme with SMS (P = 0.011) depression scores decreased while no change was observed in CAU (P = 0.875). Self-esteem scores improved significantly in the LS programme compared to CAU (P = 0.027). No differences in body image scores were observed in LS participants compared to CAU (P = 0.087), although body image improved significantly in both the LS without SMS (P = 0.001) and with SMS (P = 0.008) study arms. We found no significant mediating role by androgens in the relationship between LS participants and emotional well-being. Only weight-loss mediated the relationship between LS and self-esteem. To conclude, a three-component lifestyle intervention programme with or without additional SMS resulted in significant improvements in depression and self-esteem compared to CAU, in women with PCOS, obesity, and a wish to achieve a pregnancy. Testosterone, androstenedione, DHEA, insulin, HOMA-IR, and cortisol did not mediate this effect. Weight loss mediated the effects on self-esteem but not on depression and body-image. This suggests that lifestyle treatment independent of weight loss can reduce depression and body-image, but both lifestyle treatment and weight loss can improve self-esteem. Thus, a three-component lifestyle intervention based on CBT could prove successful in improving mood in women with PCOS who are overweight or obese and attempting to become pregnant.
-
3.
Intermittent Fasting in Cardiovascular Disorders-An Overview.
Malinowski, B, Zalewska, K, Węsierska, A, Sokołowska, MM, Socha, M, Liczner, G, Pawlak-Osińska, K, Wiciński, M
Nutrients. 2019;11(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Intermittent fasting (IF) is an eating pattern that cycles between periods of fasting and eating. IF has gained popularity in recent years with people wanting to lose weight, and it may have many long-term health benefits. In this review, the authors looked at human and animal studies using variations of IF including time restricted eating (TRE), where eating is confined within a specific window during the day (for example 8 hours eating and 16 hours fasting), and alternate day fasting (ADF), where a day of eating normally is alternated with a day of either fasting entirely, or significant calorie restriction. The authors found that IF is related to many beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, involving atherosclerosis progression, benefits for diabetes mellitus type 2 such as improved glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, lowering of blood pressure, and other cardiovascular risk factors (such as lipid profile and inflammation). It is currently unclear whether the benefits of IF are solely due to weight loss or other mechanisms. The success of every type of diet depends on compliance, and IF seems to be as easy or easier to follow than more traditional diets for many people. Fasting is not recommended for people with hormonal imbalances, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and diabetics. People with eating disorders and underweight people are also not recommended to use the intermittent fasting diet. In recent years, the IF diet and its varieties have become increasingly popular. This diet not only serves to reduce body weight but seems to have other long-term health benefits. However, individuals’ current health and situation should be considered before commencing the IF diet.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting is a form of time restricted eating (typically 16 h fasting and 8 h eating), which has gained popularity in recent years and shows promise as a possible new paradigm in the approach to weight loss and the reduction of inflammation, and has many potential long term health benefits. In this review, the authors will incorporate many aspects of fasting, mainly focusing on its effects on the cardiovascular system, involving atherosclerosis progression, benefits for diabetes mellitus type 2, lowering of blood pressure, and exploring other cardiovascular risk factors (such as lipid profile and inflammation).
-
4.
Glycemic Index, Glycemic Load and Cancer Risk: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Turati, F, Galeone, C, Augustin, LSA, La Vecchia, C
Nutrients. 2019;11(10)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
This 2019 meta-analysis is an update of an earlier 2015 study on the relationship between high Glycemic Index (GI) and Glycemic load (GL) diets and cancer risk. Twenty new epidemiological reports were added to the original seventy-five studies covering a total of 169,00 cancer cases. The theory is that elevated insulin levels, triggered by a high GI diet, increase bioactive chemicals which promote cancer development by inhibiting cell apoptosis and stimulating cell proliferation. This study collated cancers into 3 subgroups of hormonal cancers (breast, endometrium, ovary and prostate), digestive tract cancers (cancers, stomach, colorectum and pancreas) and other (lung, bladder and kidney). The combined results showed that the risk ratio for hormonal-related cancers and GI/GL were modestly elevated but not significant except for a possible moderate positive association between GL and endometrial cancer (RR1.12). There was a positive significant association between high GI intake and colorectal cancer risk (RR 1.20) but not with the other digestive-tract cancers. A high GI was associated with small increased risks of bladder (RR 1.25) and kidney (RR 1.16) cancers. The researchers conclude that the high number of studies and cancer types included provide high statistical power. Although the results show only moderate association this may be relevant at population level given the high incidence of cancers.
Abstract
Diets high in glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) have been related to an increased risk of selected cancers, but additional quantification is required. We updated a systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2015 to May 2019 to provide quantitative information on GI/GL and cancer risk. Relative risks (RR) and the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the highest versus the lowest categories of GI and GL were extracted from selected studies and pooled using random-effects models. Twenty reports (>22,000 cancer cases) have become available after January 2015, and 15 were added to the meta-analyses by cancer sites, which considered a total of 88 investigations. The five additional reports were reviewed, but not included in the meta-analyses, since data were inadequate to be pooled. For hormone-related cancers, summary RRs for the highest versus lowest GI and GL intakes were moderately increased. They ranged from 1.04 (breast) to 1.12 (endometrium) for GI and from 1.03 (prostate) to 1.22 (ovary) for GL, of borderline significance. High GI was associated with small increased risks of colorectal (summary RR for GI: 1.20, 95% CI, 1.07-1.34-GL: 1.09, 95% CI, 0.97-1.22, 19 studies), bladder (GI: 1.25, 95% CI, 1.11-1.41-GL: 1.10, 95% CI, 0.85-1.42, four studies) and kidney cancers (GI: 1.16, 95% CI, 1.02-1.32-GL: 1.14, 95% CI, 0.81-1.60, five studies). GL was not significantly related to those cancer sites. Stomach, prostate and lung cancers were not associated with GI and GL. The present analysis, based on an updated comprehensive evaluation of the epidemiological literature, indicates moderate unfavorable effects of high versus low GI on colorectal, and possibly bladder and kidney cancers, and a possible moderate positive association between GL and endometrial cancer.
-
5.
Mechanisms Underlying Metabolic Syndrome-Related Sarcopenia and Possible Therapeutic Measures.
Rubio-Ruiz, ME, Guarner-Lans, V, Pérez-Torres, I, Soto, ME
International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(3)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Sarcopenia is a multifactorial process in which losses occur in both muscle mass and function. Although several studies indicate an association between sarcopenia and metabolic syndrome (MetS), the connection has not been extensively reviewed. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between sarcopenia and MetS to better understand the mechanisms underlying disease and assess current therapeutic options. According to the existing literature, this study found insulin resistance, inflammation and obesity to be major underlying factors of MetS-related sarcopenia. Based on this information, the authors suggest the best option for managing MetS-related sarcopenia is preventative lifestyle change around diet and exercise until a consensus on a therapeutic treatment can be established.
Abstract
Although there are several reviews that report the interrelationship between sarcopenia and obesity and insulin resistance, the relation between sarcopenia and the other signs that compose the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has not been extensively revised. Here, we review the mechanisms underlying MetS-related sarcopenia and discuss the possible therapeutic measures proposed. A vicious cycle between the loss of muscle and the accumulation of intramuscular fat might be associated with MetS via a complex interplay of factors including nutritional intake, physical activity, body fat, oxidative stress, proinflammatory cytokines, insulin resistance, hormonal changes, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The enormous differences in lipid storage capacities between the two genders and elevated amounts of endogenous fat having lipotoxic effects that lead to the loss of muscle mass are discussed. The important repercussions of MetS-related sarcopenia on other illnesses that lead to increased disability, morbidity, and mortality are also addressed. Additional research is needed to better understand the pathophysiology of MetS-related sarcopenia and its consequences. Although there is currently no consensus on the treatment, lifestyle changes including diet and power exercise seem to be the best options.