Plain language summary
Snacking has been implicated in a possible reason for many individuals consuming excess calories in their diet and weight gain. However, it has been suggested that not all snacks are not equal or responsible for weight gain. Nuts are high in fat and energy dense, however regular nut consumers are leaner than non-consumers and regular consumption has been shown to result in either no weight gain or less weight gain than should be seen. This randomised control trial aimed to determine the effects of long-term consumption of almonds compared with biscuits. The results showed that neither biscuits nor almonds resulted in a greater amount of weight gain and neither affected blood lipid or sugar levels more than the other. Nut consumption did however improve nutrient intakes and diet quality with increased protein, fat, vitamin E, calcium, copper, magnesium, phosphorous, and zinc. Carbohydrate and sugar intake was also decreased when almonds were the snack. It was concluded that the incorporation of almonds into the diet by habitual snackers improved diet quality without affecting body weight or body composition compared to a biscuit snack. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to encourage snackers to switch from a high energy, low nutrient snack such as biscuits to nuts to improve diet quality and nutrient intakes.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almonds are nutrient rich, providing a healthier alternative to many snacks. Studies report health benefits with regular almond consumption without adverse weight gain. However, most interventions have been relatively short or have included additional dietary advice. OBJECTIVES Taking a pragmatic approach, we compared consumption of almonds compared with biscuits on body weight and other health outcomes in a population of regular snackers of discretionary foods, hypothesizing the almonds will displace some of the less-healthful snacks in their current diets. METHODS We randomly assigned 136 nonobese habitual discretionary snackers to receive almonds or biscuits daily for 1 y. These isocaloric snacks provided either 10% of participants' total energy (TE) requirements or 1030 kJ (equivalent to 42.5 g almonds), whichever was greater. Anthropometry, blood biomarkers, diet, appetite, sleep, and physical activity were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 mo, and body composition and RMR at baseline and 12 mo. RESULTS The difference in changes for body weight from baseline to 12 mo was not statistically significant (geometric means: 67.1 and 69.5 kg for almonds and 66.3 and 66.3 kg for biscuits, P = 0.275). There were no statistically significant differences in changes for body composition or other nondietary outcomes (all P ≥ 0.112). Absolute intakes of protein; total, polyunsaturated, and monosaturated fat; fiber; vitamin E; calcium; copper; magnesium; phosphorous; and zinc, and % TE from total monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fat statistically significantly increased from baseline (all P ≤ 0.033), whereas % TE from carbohydrate and sugar statistically significantly (both P ≤ 0.014) decreased from baseline, in the almond compared with the biscuit group. CONCLUSIONS Almonds can be incorporated into the diets of habitual snackers to improve diet quality, without evidence for changes in body weight, compared with a popular discretionary snack food. This trial was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375610&isReview=true), registration number ACTRN12618001758291.
Methodological quality
Jadad score
:
2
Allocation concealment
:
No
