Plain language summary
The timing of habitual meal consumption and composition is known to be an important factor in health status, particularly for blood glucose regulation. The aim of this randomised crossover study was to assess the effects of altering meal timing and diet composition on postprandial glucose and physical activity levels. Eight overweight or obese men with a sedentary lifestyle completed two 12-day measurement periods including a 7-day habitual period followed by a 5-day experimental period, with an 8-day washout period. The two conditions tested were a high-fat, low carbohydrate diet (HFD) and a high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet (HCD) and participants were instructed to consume meals at standardised times throughout both conditions. Body composition, oxygen consumption and blood glucose were measured at baseline and between each experimental condition. This trial found the provision of meals did not alter overall activity patterns or postprandial activity patterns. The authors observed increased sedentary activity across the day, and identify evening time as an important target for sedentary time to be minimised. Based on these results, the authors suggest that future dietary interventions consider habitual meal consumption and composition to best replicate real-world behaviours.
Abstract
We determined the effects of altering meal timing and diet composition on temporal glucose homeostasis and physical activity measures. Eight sedentary, overweight/obese men (mean ± SD, age: 36 ± 4 years; BMI: 29.8 ± 1.8 kg/m²) completed two × 12-day (12-d) measurement periods, including a 7-d habitual period, and then 5 d of each diet (high-fat diet [HFD]: 67:15:18% fat:carbohydrate:protein versus high-carbohydrate diet [HCD]: 67:15:18% carbohydrate:fat:protein) of three meals/d at ±30 min of 0800 h, 1230 h, and 1800 h, in a randomised order with an 8-d washout. Energy intake (EI), the timing of meal consumption, blood glucose regulation (continuous glucose monitor system (CGMS)), and activity patterns (accelerometer and inclinometer) were assessed across each 12-d period. Meal provision did not alter the patterns of reduced physical activity, and increased sedentary behaviour following dinner, compared with following breakfast and lunch. The HCD increased peak (+1.6 mmol/L, p < 0.001), mean (+0.5 mmol/L, p = 0.001), and total area under the curve (+670 mmol/L/min, p = 0.001), as well as 3-h postprandial meal glucose concentrations (all p < 0.001) compared with the HFD. In overweight/obese males, the provision of meals did not alter physical activity patterns, but did affect glycaemic control. Greater emphasis on meal timing and composition is required in diet and/or behaviour intervention studies to ensure relevance to real-world behaviours.
Methodological quality
Allocation concealment
:
Yes
