The effects of probiotics on total cholesterol: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Medicine. 2018;97(5):e9679

Plain language summary

Total cholesterol levels are commonly used as a marker of cardiovascular disease risk. The impact of probiotics on total cholesterol has been controversial. This meta-analysis of 32 randomised controlled trials including 1971 patients aimed to explore the effects of different probiotic strains on serum total cholesterol. The results of the meta-analysis showed that total cholesterol levels were significantly reduced in the probiotic group when compared with controls. Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, VSL#3 and Lactobacillus plantarum were found to have the most significant effects. In addition, a higher total cholesterol at the start of probiotic supplementation, a supplementation duration of longer than 8 weeks and taking the probiotics in capsule form as opposed to yoghurt, were found to have a greater impact. Nutrition practitioners wishing to support clients in the reduction of total cholesterol levels may want to consider the use of targeted probiotic therapy in their nutrition protocols.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Probiotics supplements provide a new nonpharmacological alternative to reduce cardiovascular risk factors. The impact of probiotics on the reduction of total cholesterol (TC) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to showcase the most updated and comprehensive evaluation of the studies. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched from electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database dating from January 2007 to January 2017. The curative effects of probiotics on the reduction of TC were assessed using mean difference (MD), as well as their 95% confidence interval (CI). RevMan software (version 5.3) was used to carry out this meta-analysis. RESULTS Thirty-two RCTs including 1971 patients met the inclusion criteria. Results of this analysis showed that compared with the control group serum TC was significantly reduced in probiotics group [MD = -13.27, 95% CI (-16.74 to 9.80), P < .05]. In addition, specific strains also significantly reduced serum TC, L acidophilus and B lactis [MD = -8.30, 95% CI (-10.44, -6.15), P < .05]; VSL#3 [MD = -11.04, 95% CI (-19.61, -2.48), P < .05]; L plantarum t ≤ 6 weeks: [MD = -1.56, 95% CI (-6.97, -3.86), P < .05] or t > 6 weeks: [MD = -22.18, 95% CI (-28.73, -15.63), P < .05]. Subgroup analysis indicated that the difference of baseline TC, probiotics forms and intervention duration might have a significant impact on the results. However, strains and doses of probiotics had no significant influence on curative effects. CONCLUSION Available evidence indicates that probiotics supplements can significantly reduce serum TC. Furthermore, higher baseline TC, longer intervention time, and probiotics in capsules form might contribute to a better curative effect.

Lifestyle medicine

Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Total cholesterol/probiotics
Environmental Inputs : Microorganisms
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood
Bioactive Substances : Probiotics

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Not applicable
Publication Type : Journal Article ; Meta-Analysis

Metadata