Effect of protein and carbohydrate solutions on running performance and cognitive function in female recreational runners.

PloS one. 2017;12(10):e0185982

Plain language summary

Research has shown that consuming a carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES) during endurance exercise can improve performance, delay fatigue and ameliorate post-exercise cognitive dysfuction when compared with a noncaloric placebo (PLA). The addition of protein to the CES (CPES) has been suggested to increase these benefits however the current data is limited. The aim of this crossover study was to investigate whether the added protein to a CES would improve exercise performance and cognitive function in 11 female recreational marathon runners. Participants were randomised to consume one of the three solutions (CES, CPES or PLA) every 2.5km during a 21km run, with a 28-day interval, and their VO2max and cognitive function were recorded after the run. This study showed that CES improved endurance performance compared with PLA, however adding protein to the CES did not provide any additional performance benefit. The CPES solution did benefit visual motor speed compared to PLA, but no differences were found in the other cognitive function tests.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of a carbohydrate-electrolyte-protein solution (CEPS, 2% protein plus 4% carbohydrate), carbohydrate-electrolyte solution (CES, 6% carbohydrate), and noncaloric sweetened placebo (PLA) on both 21-km running performance and cognitive function. Eleven female recreational endurance runners performed a 21-km time-trial running on three occasions, separated by at least 28 days. In a randomized cross-over design, they ingested CEPS, CES, or PLA at a rate of 150 mL every 2.5 km with no time feedback. A cognitive function test was performed before and after the run. Participants ingested approximately 24 g/h carbohydrate plus 12 g/h protein in CEPS trial, and 36 g/h carbohydrate in CES trial during each 21-km trial. Time to complete the time-trial was slightly shorter (P < 0.05) during CES (129.6 ± 8.8 min) than PLA (134.6 ± 11.5 min), with no differences between CEPS and the other two trials. The CEPS trial showed higher composite of visual motor speed than the PLA trial (P < 0.05). In conclusion, CES feedings might improve 21-km time-trial performance in female recreational runners compared with a PLA. However, adding protein to the CES provided no additional time-trial performance benefit. CEPS feeding during prolonged exercise could benefit visual motor speed compared to PLA alone, but no differences in the performance of the other cognitive function tests were found.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal ; Neurological
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Protein
Environmental Inputs : Nutrients ; Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood ; Breath ; Urine
Bioactive Substances : Protein ; Electrolytes

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Cognitivefunction ; Electrolytesolution ; VO2max ; Endurance ; Female ; Athletes ; Runners ; Fatigue