Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults.

The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2017;105(3):635-650

Plain language summary

Increased whole grain consumption has been associated with reduced levels of inflammation. This randomised, controlled trial aimed to assess the effects of a whole grain diet in comparison with a refined grain diet on the immune system, levels of inflammation and gut bacteria. 81 men and women aged between 40 and 60 were randomly assigned to either a whole grain or a refined grain diet for a period of 6 weeks. All other dietary components were kept the same and calorie levels were controlled to maintain weight levels. The study findings showed a positive effect on stool frequency and stool weight with the whole grain diet in comparison to the refined grain diet. The whole grain diet also showed modest positive effects on gut bacteria profiles and aspects of immunity. The whole grain diet showed no effects on markers of inflammation.

Abstract

Background: Observational studies suggest an inverse association between whole-grain (WG) consumption and inflammation. However, evidence from interventional studies is limited, and few studies have included measurements of cell-mediated immunity.Objective: We assessed the effects of diets rich in WGs compared with refined grains (RGs) on immune and inflammatory responses, gut microbiota, and microbial products in healthy adults while maintaining subject body weights.Design: After a 2-wk provided-food run-in period of consuming a Western-style diet, 49 men and 32 postmenopausal women [age range: 40-65 y, body mass index (in kg/m2) <35] were assigned to consume 1 of 2 provided-food weight-maintenance diets for 6 wk.Results: Compared with the RG group, the WG group had increased plasma total alkyresorcinols (a measure of WG intake) (P < 0.0001), stool weight (P < 0.0001), stool frequency (P = 0.02), and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) producer Lachnospira [false-discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P = 0.25] but decreased pro-inflammatory Enterobacteriaceae (FDR-corrected P = 0.25). Changes in stool acetate (P = 0.02) and total SCFAs (P = 0.05) were higher in the WG group than in the RG group. A positive association was shown between Lachnospira and acetate (FDR-corrected P = 0.002) or butyrate (FDR-corrected P = 0.005). We also showed that there was a higher percentage of terminal effector memory T cells (P = 0.03) and LPS-stimulated ex vivo production of tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.04) in the WG group than in the RG group, which were positively associated with plasma alkylresorcinol concentrations.Conclusion: The short-term consumption of WGs in a weight-maintenance diet increases stool weight and frequency and has modest positive effects on gut microbiota, SCFAs, effector memory T cells, and the acute innate immune response and no effect on other markers of cell-mediated immunity or systemic and gut inflammation. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01902394.

Lifestyle medicine

Patient Centred Factors : Antecedents/Dietary fibre intake
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients ; Microorganisms
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood ; Saliva ; Stool
Bioactive Substances : Fibre

Methodological quality

Allocation concealment : Not applicable

Metadata

Nutrition Evidence keywords : Refinedcarbohydrates ; Gutmicrobiome ; Dietaryfibre